|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Mikko wrote: either they are non democratic or they are democratic... Nope.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Mikko wrote: non democratic or they are democratic by bsfoot rules (coins only have two sides) Poor Meatball: never the quote he needs... he has to make them up.
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> ~stomp stomp stomp~ like i said before yes you are stomping like a 3 year old child
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Nope. no no you can't break your own rules Sweden is a democracy either they are non democratic or they are democratic by bsfoot rules (coins only have two sides)
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Poor Meatball: never the quote he needs... he has to make them up. you tell me that sweden is not a democracy that means sweden is non democratic (the other side of the coin is non democratic)
|
|
SupaAFC
Alloa, UK
|
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> United Kingdom is a monarchy. Thanks for the continual denial. That is all you could muster as a response? Face it, Britain is a typical democracy like any other western country and for reasons known only to you, you don't like that. Get over it, manchild. When the Queen starts making laws, like monarchies are supposed to do, we'll talk about Britain being a monarchy. Until then, dance some more for me.
|
|
SupaAFC
Alloa, UK
|
Darwins Stepchild wrote: <quoted text> Call your local university. Speak to the Political Science department. Ask one of the professors if the UK is a democracy. I know what his/her answer will be, and it isn't the one you've been giving. He has been unknowingly. Two degrees in politics right here, from an accredited British university, but what do I (and the literature read in the process) know when a manchild internet troll knows more about everything than anybody else? Note to manchild: that is a rhetorical question.
|
|
SupaAFC
Alloa, UK
|
barefoot2626 wrote: United Kingdom Queen Elizabeth II Constitutional But according to you Britain is not a Constitutional monarchy because we do not have a Constitution. Thus either your source is wrong, or you are wrong. Which is it?
|
|
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Mikko wrote: <quoted text> no no you can't break your own rules Poor Meatball: can't find the quote he needs, so he makes them up.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
SupaAFC wrote: <quoted text> But according to you Britain is not a Constitutional monarchy because we do not have a Constitution. Poor NotBot: as always, never the quote he needs, so he has to make them up.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
SupaAFC wrote: <quoted text> That is all you could muster as a response? All I need, SuperFAG: you have contributed anything new in two months.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
SupaAFC wrote: Face it, Britain is a typical democracy mon·ar·chy [mon-er-kee] noun, plural mon·ar·chies. 1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy. 2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person. Synonyms 1. See kingdom.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
SupaAFC wrote: Two degrees in politics right here, $49 each, with a frame, good deal for you, eh, SuperFAG? Politics, eh?
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
SupaAFC wrote: When the Queen starts making laws Poor SuperFAG: stuck making up his own quotes and his own definitions. mon·ar·chy [mon-er-kee] noun, plural mon·ar·chies. 1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy. 2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person. Synonyms 1. See kingdom.
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Poor Meatball: can't find the quote he needs, so he makes them up. poor douche can't come up with anything so he have to repeat the same stupid text
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> mon·ar·chy [mon-er-kee] noun, plural mon·ar·chies. 1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy. 2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person. Synonyms 1. See kingdom. so you are calling britain a non democratic country
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> All I need, SuperFAG: you have contributed anything new in two months. still calling him super cigarette
|
|
“Sweden is a Democracy”
Since: Jun 12
Södertälje, Sweden
|
Please wait...
in bsfoot land music players have either sound on the right channel or left never both
|
|
“Aut Pax Aut Bellum”
Since: Nov 10
Leyland (or close enough)
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Pick up a book, Skanque. It's right next to the book that proves the United Kingdom is a monarchy. Read a few and none have “conclusive” evidence, there are some that make claims usually written by US authors with lots to justify to there fellow christians and very little evidence Nope the evidence tells us that Stalin was born into a christian family, was raised Christian, for a time put his country before his faith and when he had sorted that out he returned to his faith. There is no actual EVIDENCE that Stalin was atheist However there is considerable reason for you to be know and a drippydick cuckold who leaves a yellow streak like a snail trail everywhere he walks barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Methinks you've displayed your racism for all to see. Well considering that several people including myself have highlighted your racism and that Topix admin has removed several of your posts for overt racist comments. And that no one except you and an Australian sheepshagger with a inverted Oedipus complex has complained that the term black is racist then I take you objections as mute barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> You have the real life oral experiences with drippydicks, Skanque. … PS: Guys don't care if they drip, so you know. Nice of you to do your part, though. Your delusional projection and wet dreams are just that, concocted to help you gain a semi when you masturbate. Honey, because you don’t care if you drip rancid yellow puss is your problem. barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> AS everyone in this forum knows, no matter how hard you stomp, Skanque, is you jumped in the middle of a conversation … So what is it now? You want to pretend you meant four rotor or five or three or first one that came in a wooden case? FYI, I know you have a total eco-“testical” view of yourself but you have never been classed as everyone. And your racist outburst (even if ignorant) is still a racist outburst. I commented on you post with fact – public thread, ever considered the possibility? You lie, I have never insisted the US did not capture the U505, you have mentioned this before and I asked you for evidence which you failed to produce, why, because you could not so stop fooking lying you drippydick cuckold Funnily enough I have proven my point several times that the first fully working military spec enigma machine was captured from the U110 and also that several lesser versions (with less rotors) were in the hands of the codbreakers at Bletchley park prior to this. You seem to ignore the evidence in favour of your dreams.
|
|
“Aut Pax Aut Bellum”
Since: Nov 10
Leyland (or close enough)
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Best of luck with your English lesson, Skanque. More than half of the UK Parliament are appointed. … Or if you like: I had as much to do with him being PM as you. Ahh, parliament, are you changing the goalposts and claiming that you said something different than can be read in your post, you did not mention parliament Let me quote Barfy butt breath the drippydick cuckold said – Quote More than half of the UK are appointed. That's a-p-p-o--i-n--t-e-d. EndQuote Methinks it’s the drippydick cuckold needing English lessons P.S. dickhead, I have already told you that I did not vote for him but around 150000 other people did, because you ignore what is written simply makes you ignorant Nope you have made a statement and stamped your feet, since when was that proof? Oh I doubt that, at least I voted in the 2010 UK general election – did you???– very doubtful barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> You didn't have a vote in it. …. What you said and what actually happened are two different things. I voted in the 2010 general election, live with it. The UK is a democracy, I get to vote. I know you don’t like the idea but when all is said and done it’s what the US governmental system is (very loosely) based on. What has the BNP got to do with it? Oh I see you are just trying to introduce obfuscation, fair enough barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> 120 million voters, Skanque, … Where do you make up your numbers drippydick? There are around 190 million voters in the US. It’s not my problem that some of them can’t be bothered shifting their lazy a$$es to vote is it? Again what you say about UK politics and what is real are two totally different things. I voted in the 2010 general election, I did not vote for Cameron or anyone who would vote for who would become MP. That’s the way it goes in public voting. If you want to look at the bottom line and say –‘that’s how it is so forget all the working out’ then that’s your problem, not mine barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> And these 44 million voters had no say in who was the PM, none. … (clip) Wrong, as explained to you before (several times) but you continue to stamp your feet - that’s your problem. Again for the hard on understanding I voted in the 2010 GENERAL ELECTION barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> I provided real numbers and you haven't. …
PS: If the UK did not (desperately) need our help in WWII,… Wrong, you provided irrelevant numbers dated 2 years before the start of WW2, I provided number for 1939, when WW2 started. WW2 DID NOT START IN 1937 P.S. Ahh you mean like the goods and fuel supplied to Germany as well, it’s called profiteering Begging? Where is this begging documented? barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Actually, Skanque: everyone here is fully aware that ***YOU*** are the one who suggested it. … Everyone, including you is aware that you verbally abused (and continue to verbally abuse) Straa. Given your repeated abusive racism I was fully aware how you would react and you have repeatedly proved me correct. BTW , Black is not an abusive term except by people who want to see black as an abusive term, had I dais blue eyed blonde with a huge dick would you have taken the huff so much?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|