In America, atheists are still in the closet

[barefoot2626]

KittenKoder wrote:

But atheist agnostics,

No such thing.

Like agnostic Christians.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
de·moc·ra·cy

United Kingdom is a monarchy.

Thanks for the continual denial.

[barefoot2626]

Hedonist wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually it would be more accurate to state that a high percentage of atheists are agnostic.

That is rather stupid but of course not surprising assertion considering the source.

Atheism is the *DISBELIEF*, not the lack of belief.

Agnostic atheist is no different - no less nonsensical- than agnostic Christian.

Almost pregnant?

[KittenKoder]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
No such thing.
Like agnostic Christians.

Deists are considered agnostic theists. I am an agnostic atheist, so you are saying that I am a figment of your imagination, interesting. If you think one label can describe anyone, then you are more deluded than I had suspected.

[barefoot2626]

KittenKoder wrote:

Deists are considered agnostic theists.

Only by idiots who don't speak English.

[barefoot2626]

KittenKoder wrote:

<I am an agnostic atheist

You can also tell us that you are a being from a galaxy far far away in a parallel universe.

So what?

You also told us you weren't fat...

[KittenKoder]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You can also tell us that you are a being from a galaxy far far away in a parallel universe.
So what?
You also told us you weren't fat...

No, I said I wish I was fat. Big difference.

[Lincoln]

RHill wrote:

<quoted text>
Agnostics are wimps with commitment issues.

All of them, or just some?:------)

[Lincoln]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Theist agnostics, perhaps. But atheist agnostics, we're just honest enough to say "we don't know." ;)

I would like to meet someone who does know for certain.

[Darwins Stepchild]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
STRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAW man.

Really? How?

It was you that claimed the Constitution is based on Biblical principles. I merely asked you to demonstrate that, and stated that I don't think you can.

But then, your grasp on logical fallacies is very weak, as demonstrated by your continual use of them.

[KittenKoder]

Lincoln wrote:

<quoted text>
I would like to meet someone who does know for certain.

So far, the dead do not return to tell of it though.

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

<
It was you that claimed the Constitution is based on Biblical principles.

Why don't you show everyone what I said EXACTLY?

MAKE SURE YOU PROVIDE THE LINK... because.. well, you know: you are a liar.

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

But then, your grasp on logical fallacies is very weak

You mean like when you insisted that there was a logicality fallacy in my argument where I provided two arguments to whether or not the United Kingdom was a monarchy, yes or no?

And I slapped the snot out of you and you ran away?

Happy to pick that up again, my dear, the options of the two sided coin...

[Lincoln]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
So far, the dead do not return to tell of it though.

Most of the mysteries of the universe remain so.
Bummer

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

It was you that claimed the Constitution is based on Biblical principles.

First thing first, though.

And I am not going to let you go by this... so ya know...

[Darwins Stepchild]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like when you insisted that there was a logicality fallacy in my argument where I provided two arguments to whether or not the United Kingdom was a monarchy, yes or no?
And I slapped the snot out of you and you ran away?
Happy to pick that up again, my dear, the options of the two sided coin...

Yes, precisely that...where you exercise the fallacy of the excluded middle.

See, that was easy.

You really should try harder.

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

It was you that claimed the Constitution is based on Biblical principles.

Where oh where is that quote?

[Thinking]

I can't prove bsfoot doesn't f** kids.

None of us can.

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, precisely that...where you exercise the fallacy of the excluded middle.
See, that was easy.
You really should try harder.

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, precisely that...where you exercise the fallacy of the excluded middle.

I already slapped the snot out of you on this.

There is no middle.

There is no 'a little bit pregnant'.

Where's that quote, Shug?

[barefoot2626]

Thinking wrote:

I can't prove bsfoot doesn't f** kids.
None of us can.
<quoted text>

Your ankle bracelet, your arrest record, and the red circle on the map around your house seem to indicate you try.

Certainly: you can't prove you haven't.