In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 51425 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46312 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
we all now know that you cannot stand the heat when it backfires on you
Backfires?

You mean: like when you say my 'wife' ran off with a BLACK man?

And you saying it doesn't make you racist, it makes me racist for thinking that you are a racist?

NotBot thinking... eh?

Like guys have drippydicks and they left a bad taste in your mouth but you are thinking you are insulting people with penises by telling them they taste bad.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46313 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And you? and all liars, you see, just as you have limited tolerance for atheists I have zero tolerance for liars
Must cause you concerns when you wake up in the morning and look in the mirror... brushing your teeth, trying to get the taste of drippydick out of your mouth, eh, Skanque?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46314 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
With some of these liars I end up with a little mental exercise
To be sure, Skanque, it looks like you have grown FAT mentally ... as well... from lack of exercise.

It starts by admitting you are wrong when you have been some publicly humiliated.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46315 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Only after a vote by the electorate can the prospective PMs political party select a leader from those candidates who have been elected as MPs
Already refuted, Drippydickbreath.

Maurice Harold Macmillan

PS: The Parliament makes a SUGGESTION, the monarch isn't required to take it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46316 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you have such difficulty with the concept of democracy?
Is the United King_dom a monarchy, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46317 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
That’s vote, V – O – T – E, vote
More than half of the UK are appointed.

That's a-p-p-o--i-n--t-e-d.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46318 Jan 16, 2013
[QUOTE who="ChristineM"
That’s vote, V – O – T – E, vote
[/QUOTE]

When did you last vote for the Prime Minister, Skanque?

Never.

That's N-E-V-E-R.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46319 Jan 16, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Oh hang on, that’s not allowed is it, the electoral college makes that choice for you – right?
No, DrippyDickBreath.

We vote for the members of the college.

When did you vote for your PM again?

“Turning coffee into theorems”

Since: Dec 06

Trapped inside a Klein Bottle

#46320 Jan 16, 2013
So...

Has this thread become barefoot vs. the world?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#46321 Jan 16, 2013
Darwins Stepchild wrote:
So...
Has this thread become barefoot vs. the world?
Hey DS! LTNS. I hope all is well.

Yes, this thread has become a bit bare. Some of the other threads still have some fiber.
SupaAFC

Dunblane, UK

#46322 Jan 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Do stop making me responsible for your ignorance and stupidity.
Yup, that is what actual monarchies do - make laws. Why else do you think the French revolted against their monarchy? Or Cromwell and the Roundheads against Charles? Or even your own ancestors against the Crown?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
PS: The monarch must endorse any legislation passed by the Parliament before it can become the law.
305 years and counting. Conclusion? It is a ceremonial act.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
PPS: Most of the members of the UK Parliament via appointment.
Who, other than you, cares? The Lords has essentially become a gentlemans' club for old retired celebrities, politicians and bureaucrats.

All the action is in the Commons. Not the Lords, not at Buckingham, but in the Commons.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for posting this.

Putting aside of course, it's the 'UK' not 'Britain'.
"Putting aside of course, it's the "United States", not "USA".

Whether you call it "Britain" or "UK" makes no real difference; people still get the point without being pedantic enough to make a scene of it. Although, as you continually show you will jump on anything if it means avoiding the substance of my post.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor SuperFAG: moving the goalposts again.
Not remotely. I stated that the Queen rubber stamps bills (which, she does) and you responded with a blanket "Already refuted" statement.

To refute that point would require showing a time when the Queen has not rubber-stamped a bill. It is not moving the goalposts in the slightest; you simply prayed that I would not remember what these "goalposts" were referring to.

So, prove me wrong, manchild, instead of demonstrating your ignorance of what argumentative fallacies actually are.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Let me know when you find something you can refute.
Easy: anything that my pet manchild posts. Your determination to persist with refuted arguments that you pretend are legitimate epitomises everything that the Monty Python team thought of when they created the Black Knight character in the Holy Grail.

Keep the posts coming, little boy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46323 Jan 16, 2013
Darwins Stepchild wrote:
So...
Has this thread become barefoot vs. the world?
The world is losing.

Maybe if you can find someone on your side that can find the truth?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46324 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup, that is what actual monarchies do - make laws.
mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.

++

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46325 Jan 16, 2013
[QUOTE who="SupaAFC"
Keep the posts coming, little boy.
[/QUOTE]
YOU KEEP SWALLOWINMG MY WAD, SuperFAG!

HAHAHAHAHAH!
mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46326 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
305 years and counting. Conclusion?
Swallow, SuperFAG.

mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
2. supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46327 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Who, other than you, cares? The Lords has essentially
You mean the larger half of the UK Parliament?

Gosh, you mean when I say more members of the UK Parliament are appointed, I am right again!

OH MY!

Wipe your chin, SuperFAG!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46328 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
To refute that point would require showing a time when the Queen has not rubber-stamped a bill.
Moving the goalposts, again, SuperFAG?

Like when you insisted ALL PMs were elected and I proved you wrong - that Macmillian was not elected... and you wanted another example?

Of course: I only have actual facts and actual laws on my side...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46329 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
So, prove me wrong, manchild, cter in the Holy Grail.
Keep the posts coming, little boy.
Wipe your chin, SuperFAG.

United KING_dom, monarchy, YES OR NO, BOY!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46330 Jan 16, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
"Putting aside of course, it's the "United States", not "USA".
Whether you call it "Britain" or "UK" makes no real difference...
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

Funny how it makes a difference if dare I call the UK Britian, FUNNY HOW THAT IS.

I guess the NotBots have being pedantic trademarked.

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Nykvarn, Sweden

#46331 Jan 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Stalin = atheist.
Stalin reinstated the Russian Orthodox Church in order to boost morale no atheist would do that!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 32 min lightbeamrider 1,751
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 3 hr nanoanomaly 27,240
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 128
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 57,830
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 5,954
god belief down to 28% in UK 7 hr Eagle 12 123
carbon 14 dating very inaccurate (Jun '12) 7 hr Eagle 12 72
More from around the web