In America, atheists are still in the closet

[Mikko]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Atheist.
Do try to follow the tread, Meatball.

Theravada Buddhist

do that your self, douche!

[Mikko]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
a) Buddhist "ideology" doesn't prescribe killing people you disagree with
b) Atheist

a) Atheism isn't an ideology.
b) Buddhist.

[-Skeptic-]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
To be fair, not knowing what you were talking about never kept you from posting... as we see here.

The statement was do "you" know what what "you" are talking about? I'm sorry you have so many problems with the english language.

[RHill]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
How many sides are there to a coin, Booby?
It takes not a wise man to count to two.

Three. Heads, tails, edge. They're really sections of a cylinder having some non-zero length (height). Wise up.

[barefoot2626]

macumazahn wrote:

Now he's flailing around trying to claim that I'm misquoting him - when I'm using his own, exact, in-context words.

What I said:

(quote)
"There is no middle ground, there is no range of choices."
(/quote)

What you claimed I said (and do notice the quote marks):
(quoted:)
A perfect example of the Excluded Middle fallacy - particularly amusing since you just admitted that there IS a "range of choices".

(/quote)

Now what is the difference between "there is no range of choices"
and what claimed I said:'there IS a "range of choices"'.

Class?

Is there NO difference?

[barefoot2626]

Mikko wrote:

<quoted text>
a) Atheism isn't an ideology.

For you NotBot bigots, it is... obviously.

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

I'm sorry you have so many problems with the english language.

'english', eh?

[barefoot2626]

macumazahn wrote:

<quoted text>Nope.

Yep.

NotBots: if he doesn't say what you want him to say, change it and call it a quote.

[macumazahn]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
What I said:
(quote)
"There is no middle ground, there is no range of choices."
(/quote)
What you claimed I said (and do notice the quote marks):
(quoted:)
A perfect example of the Excluded Middle fallacy - particularly amusing since you just admitted that there IS a "range of choices".
(/quote)
Now what is the difference between "there is no range of choices"
and what claimed I said:'there IS a "range of choices"'.
Class?
Is there NO difference?

Now you're being deliberately deceptive. You're not very good at it.

What you said, and what I quoted: "the monarch of the UK has far more power than the monarch of Sweden."

That's a clear statement that there is, in fact, a range.

Try harder.

[barefoot2626]

macumazahn wrote:

<

What I said:

(quote)
"There is no middle ground, there is no range of choices."
(/quote)

What you claimed I said (and do notice the quote marks):
(quoted:)
A perfect example of the Excluded Middle fallacy - particularly amusing since you just admitted that there IS a "range of choices".

(/quote)

Now what is the difference between "there is no range of choices"
and what claimed I said:'there IS a "range of choices"'.

++

Thanks for reestablishing yourself as the forum liar.

And making it so easy for me to prove.

[barefoot2626]

macumazahn wrote:

Now you're being deliberately deceptive.

Now what is the difference between "there is no range of choices"
and what claimed I said:'there IS a "range of choices"'?

Class?

Class?

[barefoot2626]

macumazahn wrote:

<
That's a clear statement that there is, in fact, a range.

I said: "there is no range of choices"
You claimed I said: "there IS a "range of choices".

You put it in quotes, even.

You are a liar.

We knew that.

[Lincoln]

macumazahn wrote:

<quoted text>Now you're being deliberately deceptive. You're not very good at it.
What you said, and what I quoted: "the monarch of the UK has far more power than the monarch of Sweden."
That's a clear statement that there is, in fact, a range.
Try harder.

Argument for the 16th century, Monarchy

"In America Monarchists are still in the closet!" :-)

[Mikko]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
For you NotBot bigots, it is... obviously.

atheism isn't an ideology and you are the bigot

[ChristineM]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Stalin embarrassed all that atheism offered and then he started killing millions of people.

Wrong, Stalin embarrassed everyone, particularly his Christian upbringing

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Pol Pot... atheist.
…
, eh, Skanque?

Pol Pot spent 15 years in a catholic boarding school learning catholic doctrine and good old christian hatred. Yes my ideas exactly he selectively forgot the good bits of the babble and took the bad bits of christian teaching to heart. Which has often happened throughout the history of the babble

Do you have a moustache eh drippydick cuckold?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You speak for none of them, Waddles.
…
In real life.

Nope, they speak for themselves.

Did I say more horrified? I think not I think you are making up sh|t again. Honey you are the one who doth protest too much when your sh|t hits the fan, you can’t stand the heat then get out of the frying pan

Who said it was an insult to be black, OK that was you, right, you closet racist moron

And drippydicks, you seem so sure of my actions, It’s so funny that just because you are a puss oozing dick sucker you assume everyone else is

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
It isn't and never was ever a real question, Skanque.
…
You don't see that kind of hypocrisy from me; I don't have problems calling out people who on other topics might otherwise agree.

Are you saying that all the numerous times you have asked me if the UK is a monarch or not, with a question mark that it was not a real question. Jeezuz fooking christ on a crutch, your sloping shoulder copouts are hilarious, must be the syphilitic rotting of your brain
I don’t ever remember seeing anyone claiming that the UK was not a monarchy. What I remember is you trying to start argument after argument.

We see all kinds of hypocrisy from you every day, we see repeated and discredited lies from you often too. All this means is you are do chicken sh|t yellow to admit you faults

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I cannot recall being disproved on a single thing.
...

You also seem to suffer memory loss as well as bigoted hypocritical racism.
Cause of the global financial crisis of 2007? Did you forget that one?
Can you vote for who becomes president? Did you forget that one?
Do my children worship at school? Did you forget that one?
Did the voters of Whitney vote for David Cameron? Did you forget that one?
My discussion was not on the U505 as you very well know because I deliberately included the U110 in my first post on the subject, but conveniently forget that.
And I showed you that the law you quoted and actions appertaining to that are two different things. Your hatred and misunderstanding of British life showed you to be a pedantic moron on that argument
Ok this is your non question – right, you hypocritical drippydick cuckold moron
Again you ignore democracy, the PM is approved by the queen ONLY after being elected as an MP by the public and elected as a party leader by the publicly elected members of his party. Again you fail to understand that the UK has been a democracy for longer than the US has existed
Don’t remember you arguing this one with me.
Don’t remember you arguing this one with me
U505, Again, not my argument
My argument here was that the first “fully working” enigma was captured from the U110
Your opinion not born out by Hitler’s foray into Russia.
Wrong, I have shown you the numbers. 1937, the year you showed your figures for WAS NOT the start of WW2. FYI, WW2 started in 1939, the year which my figures dated from. Or perhaps you mean when the US decided to get off the fence in December 1941.
It’s skin flaking off the top of your head, the cause scratching your syphilitic scalp itch

barefoot2626 wrote:

PS: we know you have had them in your mouth... in real life......check!

You guess drippydick, nothing more.

[ChristineM]

Thinking wrote:

I'd like to see more of them together.
Or put the Infinite Monkey Cage on TV, that would be good too.
<quoted text>

The infinite monkey cage on TV, that would be great

How do you think such a production would go down over the pond?

[ChristineM]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't dish it out if you and your aliases are going to cry about it being flung back in your face.
I see you don't have a problem with ChristineM using the terms "t\/\/at" and frequently "cocksucker" and dozens of daily references to oozing penises.
So you opinion... doesn't really have much weight.

Honey, you started the name calling, you don’t like the heat…

[Thinking]

I think many in the US would love it.

Get Neil deGrasse Tyson and Seth Shostak on as guests and it will go down very well in the usual coastal parts of America that get this sort of thing.

The problem is that once something starts doing well, the US TV industry will feel obliged to remake it and f**k the quality over as per usual.

If it wasn't Ince/Cox, I wouldn't watch it.

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
The infinite monkey cage on TV, that would be great
How do you think such a production would go down over the pond?

[Lincoln]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong, Stalin embarrassed everyone, particularly his Christian upbringing......

"Stalin embarrassed everyone...."
killed 20 million people and
embarrassment
was the result.:-)

An odd view...

is this typical of atheist thinking?

[ChristineM]

Lincoln wrote:

<quoted text>
"Stalin embarrassed everyone...."
killed 20 million people and
embarrassment
was the result.:-)
An odd view...
is this typical of atheist thinking?

Please tell me why you did not point out barfy butt face’s original claim in post

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...

Quote
Stalin embarrassed all that atheism offered and then he started killing millions of people.
Endquote

Oh I get it now, that was from the christian point of view and therefore too good to comment on – right?

So it’s fine by you that a guy who was raised as a christian and tipped for the priesthood caused embarrassment to atheists but not when that same gut who was raised in christian tradition causes embarrassment to christians

I guess it’s just the same as modern day christian sloping there shoulders and denying the facts that Hitler was christian

I.E. christians are willing to lie and even deny historical fact for their god and that is typical christian thinking