In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 47709 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45993 Jan 7, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
You words not mine you cocksucking cuckold
Everyone here knows what you have had in your mouth, Skanque, what exactly it is that you have had banging against the back of your throat.

In the real world, Skanque.

And they know exactly why you have had such a great view of drippyingdicks.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#45994 Jan 7, 2013
yawn.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#45995 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
'Monarchy definition, a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.'
What's the official name of Sweden?
Do stop spamming the thread, Meatball.
king of sweden no supreme power
swedish constitution says that All public power in Sweden proceeds from the people.
Democracy
"government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system." that means sweden is a democracy
stop spamming the thread with your lies,
SupaAFC

Kinross, UK

#45996 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean refused to link to the website that you listed after I have you an entire paragraph (verbatim) that any six grade could google?
And you wanted to give you the link after you posted the link, SuperFAG?
You are ridiculous SuperFAG, you know that?
Pretty desperate stuff to distort what I asked for, Barefoot.

You, based on nothing but the fact that your claim was supported by only one online resource, subsequently demand that I must tell you the author of the Wikipedia articles that I have used previously. Yet, not once have you ever named the author of yours.

Double standards anyone? I think so. If my argument was outdated, like yours, and dishonest, like yours, then I would rather stay quiet instead of make a fool of myself like you do on a daily basis.

Fess up, Barefoot. You got owned with that source and have been trying to run away from it ever since.

Tell us again about why we should care about a monarch who pets corgis all day.
SupaAFC

Kinross, UK

#45997 Jan 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
king of sweden no supreme power
swedish constitution says that All public power in Sweden proceeds from the people.
Democracy
"government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system." that means sweden is a democracy
stop spamming the thread with your lies,
But, but Mikko... the DICTIONARY says that monarchies rule Sweden, so why should we care about how the county actually functions?

Can you imagine how simpler academic life would be if we just relied on the dictionary? No need to write dissertations and theses - just quote one or two definitions from the dictionary, job done.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45998 Jan 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
king of sweden no supreme power
Kingdom of Sweden

mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]

noun, plural mon·ar·chies.

1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45999 Jan 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
stop spamming the thread with your lies,
mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]

noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.

Stop spamming the thread, Meatball.

Flagged

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46000 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You, based on nothing but the fact that your claim was supported by only one online resource
I'm nopt interested in your FAIRY tales, SuperFag.

Anything else?

Is the KING_dom of the United KING_dom a KINDOM, yes or no?

Is the official name of Sweden the KINGDOM of Sweden? Yes or no, fairy?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46001 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You, based on nothing but the fact that your claim was supported by only one online resource
Not true, SuperFAG.

There is that LONG quote- which was marked as a quote- it doesn't mean (by a long shot) that it was the only source.

And it negates not at all global criticism of using Wiki as a primary source, especially the sources are anonymous.

Anything else, Shug?

Is the United King_dom a monarchy, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46002 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
But, but Mikko... the DICTIONARY says that monarchies rule Sweden
And Barefoot2626 insists that Sweden...and the United KING_dom are monarchies.

Official name of that country is: KINGDOM of Sweden.

king·dom
/&#712;kiNGd&#601;m/
Noun

A country, state, or territory ruled by a king or queen.

A realm associated with or regarded as being under the control of a particular person or thing.
SupaAFC

Kinross, UK

#46003 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm nopt interested in your FAIRY tales, SuperFag.
Anything else?
You are saying that the website you pasted from is a fairytale?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the KING_dom of the United KING_dom a KINDOM, yes or no?
Is the official name of Sweden the KINGDOM of Sweden? Yes or no, fairy?
Does Barefoot think that dictionaries define reality? Yes or no?

If I write a definition for "Barefoot" as "a manchild who lives his life on Topix", does that make it reality? It would be a near-accurate definition, but does it encapsulate everything about Barefoot?

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#46004 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.
Stop spamming the thread, Meatball.
Flagged
king = no power
All public power in Sweden proceeds from the people (the Swedish Constitution)= democracy

stop spamming!
Flagged!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46005 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
You are saying that the website you pasted from is a fairytale?
NotBot's favorite: straw man

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46006 Jan 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
king = no power
King_dom of Sweden

Stop scamming, meatball.

Flagged!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46007 Jan 8, 2013
[QUOTE who="SupaAFC"
Does Barefoot think that dictionaries define reality?
[/QUOTE]

It's nice that all English dictionaries back me up, SuperFAG.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46008 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
If I write a definition for "Barefoot" as "a manchild who lives his life on Topix"
I think is is funny that someone who posts hundreds of comments directly at me can accuse anyone else of living his life on Topix.

You can't have me, SuperFAG, I don't row that way, but I hear Skanque is looking for someone and you two share that tonsil massage thing, maybe that will work out for you.
Lincoln

United States

#46009 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Kingdom of Sweden
mon·ar·chy
[mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.
You might try youtube next
or
wiki or
take a GED class?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46010 Jan 8, 2013
[QUOTE who="Lincoln"
take a GED class?[/QUOTE]

Leaving space for you, darling. You need it.
SupaAFC

Kinross, UK

#46011 Jan 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
NotBot's favorite: straw man
I am simply responding to what you type. All you could say in response to my point that you are only crying about Wikipedia because I exposed your source as unsupported and unauthoritative was that I was telling fairytales.

Thus, you were saying that the website you pasted from is a fairytale.

Here's a tip, manchild: read before you post instead of typing the first childish rant that comes to mind.

Royal Assent has not been refused in over 300 years. Three hundred. Three, zero, zero.

What does that say about our monarchy?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46012 Jan 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
I am simply responding to what you type
Straw man.

I know: you can't get around the long list of facts I have presented.

Poor baby...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 4 min thetruth 9,560
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Anon 243,572
News Founders created secular nation (Jul '10) 12 hr The_Box 522
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) 21 hr USaWarringIDIOTSo... 6,224
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) Mon TC_Tia 14,656
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) Mon MikeF 19,806
News Atheism must be about more than just not believ... Jul 4 Amused 2
More from around the web