In America, atheists are still in the closet

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, it was war, you point is?
Actually the number of deaths is disputed between 22,000 and 135,000 (German official figures) for the Dresden bombings.

Actually, you should learn how to read.

Sun rises in the east... etc.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

BTW Germany bombed the hell out of London

BTW: England started the bombing of cities, Germany retaliated.

[Thinking]

scientology is refused tax free status in the UK, France and many other countries.

Any country that issues tax exemption to that bunch of cruisetards has issues!

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Well the first one is not a fact, more a supposition made by Americans with nothing good to show for themselves
The second one is of course a fact, no one has argues otherwise
The Third is a matter of semantics, he is actually appointed at party leader and the queen approves his appointment
The fourth is total garbage, it does NOT require any such thing. What the law states and what is actually requires are two different things
No, typically you misunderstand the British tax system, Churches are not financed from tax, they do however have gift aide status as do charities. This means they pay less tax on specific (signed for) gifts and donations.
Deny? I only deny the lies you tell and try and enlighten you when you err. Unfortunately you take no notice of facts but rely instead on the bafy butt face know it all attitude.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<The ignorant T\/\/AT

Obviously we know who the T\/\/AT is.

Wipe your double chin, Skanque, looks like you've been at the drippydicks again.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

No wonder his wife ran of with a black man

Thanks **AGAIN** for exhibiting your OVERT racism.

As we know so many Brits are...

As if the thought of a wife I don't have running off with a BLACK man would be even somehow worse than running off with a white guy.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Well the first one is not a fact, more a supposition made by Americans

The war was tied (or the Allies were losing ground) until the US began sending in troops.

The Allies would not have won WWI without the US.

Sun rises in the east.

And only a ignorant jingoist racist bigot like yourself would say otherwise.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

The second one is of course a fact, no one has argues otherwise

Great! everyone agrees the United Kingdom is in a downhill spiral and soon the only United part of the United KING_dumb will be England. Maybe Wales...

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

The fourth is total garbage, it does NOT require any such thing. What the law states and what is actually requires are two different things

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAHHA!

The law requires that you obey what the law states.

Do let me know when English law started meaning what the law suggests.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

Wipe your double chin, T\/\/AT!

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Brilliantly and concisely put
In the 1973 referendum the public were asked

Tick tock.

It's 2013.

The unification of Ireland is within sight.

Certainly as the United KING_dom collapses.

Scotland is next.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
The same reason as the word skanque fascinates you, to p|ss you off

You haven't come close to pissing me off, Skanque, no matter how hard you froth, no matter how you demonstrate just how big a racist you are.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

Flat? More barfy butt breath dreams,

Of course, Skanque, we know this must be true because you never lie.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

Tell us more of your encounters with the drippydicks of the third kind...

[barefoot2626]

Thinking wrote:

scientology is refused tax free status in the UK, France and many other countries.
Any country that issues tax exemption to that bunch of cruisetards has issues!

Oh, it is so much better in countries with state religions- like the United Kingdom- to official declare which religions are real and which aren't.

And to reward real religions with tax exempt statuses.

Because we all know the Church of England is based on facts...

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

No, typically you misunderstand the British tax system, Churches are not financed from tax

Churches- particularly, the Church of England- do in fact receive tax monies and tax privileges.

[macumazahn]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Brilliantly and concisely put
In the 1973 referendum the public were asked
1. Do you want Northern Ireland to remain part of the United Kingdom?
or
2. Do you want Northern Ireland to be joined with the Republic of Ireland outside the United Kingdom?
the result was 98.9% in favour of option 1

Considerably to the relief of many of us in the Republic.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

No wonder his wife ran of with a black man

Racist bigots such as yourself are usually preoccupied by racial fantasies.

Tell us, bigot: do you dream of black drippydicks?

[Richardfs]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW: England started the bombing of cities, Germany retaliated.

Wrong.

[Thinking]

If Scotland wants to opt out of the economic relationship they willingly joined in 1707, they need to take Northern Ireland with them. It seems the more intransigent someone is, the more Scottish their surname.

macumazahn wrote:

<quoted text>Considerably to the relief of many of us in the Republic.

[barefoot2626]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong.

Among many sources...
"This was the time when Churchill began to think about the need for an 'absolutely devastating exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland.' When on the night of 24 August 1940 the German air force - the Luftwaffe - accidentally and against Hitler's orders - dropped some bombs over London, the British prime minister requested a retaliatory raid on Berlin. Hitler responded by going ahead with the Blitz, and the following months and years saw tit-for-tat raids on each country's cities.

At the same time, Britain's air force began to realise that its bombers were not able to find and hit specific war targets such as airfields or armament factories. An investigation revealed that just one in five aircraft was succeeding in dropping its bombs within five miles of its target. Under such circumstances, the bombing offensive could only be effective if it was directed at targets as big as cities.

Consequently, in February 1942, Bomber Command was instructed to shift the focus onto the 'morale of the enemy civil population'. This new policy came to be called 'area bombing'.

The aiming points thereafter, for bombing raids, were no longer military or industrial installations, but a church or other significant spot in the centre of industrial towns. And since fire was found to be the most effective means of destroying a town, the bombers now carried mainly incendiary bombs.

Thus, the exigencies of war had rendered the traditional distinction between combatants and non-combatants meaningless. Nearly everybody living in an 'industrial town' was considered to contribute directly or indirectly to the German war effort, and had therefore become a supposedly legitimate target"

and

" While Germany refrained from aerial bombing of British cities after the British declaration of war on Germany in September 1939, Britain started aerial bombing of Germany, officially focusing on military and industrial targets, on the night of 15/16 May with 78 bombers against oil targets, 9 against steelworks and 9 against marshaling yards.[11] Oil remained the main British objective until the summer of 1941."

[straa]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
US = 4,300,000-4,700,000 troops
Canada = 600,0000
Poor Packy.

What's your point, all you've done is embarrass yourself even more, the fact that 600,000 Canadians did more and had more of an impact on world war one that 4 million Americans speaks volumes, don't you think

[barefoot2626]

straa wrote:

<quoted text>
What's your point,

~stomp stomp stomp~

stomp Packy stomp