In America, atheists are still in the closet

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<
Why do you lie? Pledge of allegiance ring any bells?

The sun rises in the east. School children in the US recite the ledge of allegiance.

I can tell you from personal experience, when 30 children bleat "under God" in the morning, the sky does open up and a light fall down from the heavens.

[RHill]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
The sun rises in the east. School children in the US recite the ledge of allegiance.
I can tell you from personal experience, when 30 children bleat "under God" in the morning, the sky does open up and a light fall down from the heavens.

The same sky opens, the same light falls whether it's children or sheep. Only the ego of Godbot's makes it into a special show, put on by the Creator of the Universe for your personal enjoyment. What an ego!

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Is the United KING.......dom a monarchy, yes or no?

Have you stopped raping children? Yes or no?

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
WTF is wrong with you, I have always acknowledged it exists

I'm not the one who is insisting the sun doesn't rise in the east.

I'm the one who said the United KING_dom is a monarchy, and you (et al.) are the ones insisting otherwise.

You want to pretend that uttering the words "under God" is some kind of Christian patronage in the USA but you live in a country that has a LAW requiring Christian worship in 'public' schools -actual PRAYER- and a country that has a STATE religion and a country whose head of state is the head of that state religion.

It's hard to take you seriously, Skanque.

[barefoot2626]

RHill wrote:

What an ego!

GotBot or NotBot: same kind of animal.

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Prime Minister Macmillan...

Taking a break from responding only to your first of many convoluted posts to address another failure:

"The Queen appointed Macmillan Prime Minister after taking advice from Winston Churchill and Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 5th Marquess of Salisbury, who had asked the Cabinet individually for their opinions, all but two or three of them opting for Macmillan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Macmillan...

In other words, the Tory elite majority decided on Macmillan. The Queen, as per usual, rubber stamped it.

[SupaAFC]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Aww but it’s fun to make him rant his BS about things he is clueless about. However I am getting a little tired of showing him facts only for him to repeatedly effectively reply that’s not the answer he wanted because it does not agree with his wet dreams and hatred

The easiest way to deal with him is to respond only to his first post. Barefoot's tactic is to substitute quality with quantity so tries his upmost to overwhelm people with waves of posts that do not really differ much at all.

Barefoot: everybody's favourite manchild whack-a-mole.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
Taking a break from responding only to your first of many convoluted posts to address another failure:
"The Queen appointed Macmillan Prime Minister after taking advice from Winston Churchill and Robert Gascoyne-Cecil...

GOSH!

Let's try to remember which one of us who was saying that the monarch APPOINTED the prime minister!!!!

Let me check...

Oh, that was me!

Wait, wait, that is that tricky definition of appointed that you (et al.) insisted was the "technically correct" meaning of the word...

And then you (et al.) INSISTED that the prime minister was ELECTED by the Parliament.

(putting aside, the PM is "elected" by part of the (sometimes) majority party of the hOUSE OF cOMMONS.

GOSH! there I go again... being..."factually" correct...

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

In other words, the Tory elite majority decided

"decided"?

Please explain this "majority"!

!!!!!!!!!!

You mean... not elected?

Do tell!

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
The easiest way to deal with him is to respond only to his first post.

Right.

Your hundreds of responses speaking louder than your lying words.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Have you stopped raping children? Yes or no?

Have you, SuperFAG?

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

Prove it cocksucker.

I point to the stains on your pillowcases, and to your sticky gums.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

Tell me how many British children have been arrested for not attending “compulsory” worship?

How many times to I have to explain to you, Sticky, that the law in the UK requires "public" schools *provide* religious worship, not that it forces children to attend?

I understand it is beyond you- that having a school by law provide religious worship is government establishment of (in the UK ) state religion.

[barefoot2626]

ChristineM wrote:

Prove it cocksucker.

Temper, temper!

Between the two of us, BTW, you are the one that notices the drips.

[enquirer mind]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I point to the stains on your pillowcases, and to your sticky gums.

I point to the skid mark in your shorts in the front and back!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!!

[barefoot2626]

enquirer mind wrote:

<quoted text> I point to the skid mark in your shorts in the front and back!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!!

I point to the skid marks running across your lips, top and bottom, and do not wonder why you aren't clever enough to stick to one alias.

[water_nymph]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Really?
Why is it that I can respond to the yes or no question: Is the United KING_dom a monarchy? without hesitation or difficulty?

You are a freakin' idiot.

[barefoot2626]

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>You are a freakin' idiot.

And you are a real freaking HO.

[Aura Mytha]

Aerobatty wrote:

<quoted text>
Over here, bullshit is free.
And plentiful.

You do get more than you can swallow , for less than nothing even.

[macumazahn]

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>You are a freakin' idiot.

The funny bit is, he's the only one making the claims he's so noisily refuting.

That's not just a strawman, it's a straw village.