In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 47746 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#44664 Dec 12, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
How much bull shit do you get to an English pound vs the American dollar?
Over here, bullshit is free.

And plentiful.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44665 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Your experience and your drippydick does not concern me
They shouldn't: you are the one with the complete oral experience here.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44666 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
It work out that christianity is down 18% in 10 years, won’t be long now
Maybe you can start by revoking the law that requires religious worship in tax-funded schools?

Something which would be banned over here in the USA.

But of course: the majority of SUBJECTS in the United KING_dom are Christian, still, I guess you read into the numbers what you want to read.

PS: I see followers of Jedi outnumber Atheists 6 to 1, with the atheists coming in at a fraction of one percent.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#44667 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
They shouldn't: you are the one with the complete oral experience here.
He barfy butt breath I am not the one sporting a drippydick, tell me how do you reconcile your guesswork and lies with your JW god Jehovah watching every thing you do?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44668 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
Second more than 50% of US schoolchildren are required by state law to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, rabbiting on that they are part
The pledge has the words "under God" in it.

So?

Tell me: out of the tens of millions of children who recite the pledge, how many have been arrested in the history of time for not reciting it?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44669 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
First there is a law but it is not upheld
Ah... now I guess after posting the law fifty times you acknowledge that the law exists.

As I pointed out 49 times, it matters not that SOME schools do not obey the law, just as it does not matter that most people exceed the speed law when I say the law exists.

In comparing the religious influence of the church, the FACT that your STATE church has enough influence on legislators and of course the head of state being the head of the state religion approving the law goes to the comparison to the US constitution which BANS such influence.

US... having a constitution...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44670 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
He barfy butt breath I am not the one sporting a drippydick,
Between the two: you are the only one that has had one in her mouth.

Okay, Honey?

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#44671 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you can start by revoking the law that requires religious worship in tax-funded schools?
Something which would be banned over here in the USA.
But of course: the majority of SUBJECTS in the United KING_dom are Christian, still, I guess you read into the numbers what you want to read.
PS: I see followers of Jedi outnumber Atheists 6 to 1, with the atheists coming in at a fraction of one percent.
No need, the law is more or less defunct anyway

Why do you lie? Pledge of allegiance ring any bells?

Yes and down 18%, isn’t life great.

And 25% of the population are now non religious.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The pledge has the words "under God" in it.
So?
Tell me: out of the tens of millions of children who recite the pledge, how many have been arrested in the history of time for not reciting it?
Yes so, what happens if you don’t happen to believe in any god does that mean you have to lie to be American?

Tell me how many British children have been arrested for not attending “compulsory” worship?

You want comparison then compare apples and apples

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44672 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
He barfy butt breath I am not the one sporting a drippydick, tell me how do you reconcile your guesswork and lies with your JW god Jehovah watching every thing you do?
I imagine the same way you managed to get through your day praying to your lord Satan help guide you with what decisions you make.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#44673 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah... now I guess after posting the law fifty times you acknowledge that the law exists.
As I pointed out 49 times, it matters not that SOME schools do not obey the law, just as it does not matter that most people exceed the speed law when I say the law exists.
In comparing the religious influence of the church, the FACT that your STATE church has enough influence on legislators and of course the head of state being the head of the state religion approving the law goes to the comparison to the US constitution which BANS such influence.
US... having a constitution...
WTF is wrong with you, I have always acknowledged it exists, I have also acknowledged that it is not implemented but hey if you want to argue about what I said and what I didn’t say that’s just fine. Go got it

Influence? Yehhh, right… With 760 lords and almost 650 in the commons (that’s just over 1400 members) I don’t think 25 lords spiritual will have too much influence, now be honest, do you?

And again you show your ignorance of the British constitution, the monarch is above politics and has no influence on political decisions
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Between the two: you are the only one that has had one in her mouth.
Okay, Honey?
Prove it cocksucker. That’s what I like to see, more barfy butt face lies to destroy what little credibility you have left yourself

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44674 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
No need, the law is more or less defunct anyway
Amended in 2010.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44675 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<
Why do you lie? Pledge of allegiance ring any bells?
The sun rises in the east. School children in the US recite the ledge of allegiance.

I can tell you from personal experience, when 30 children bleat "under God" in the morning, the sky does open up and a light fall down from the heavens.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#44676 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The sun rises in the east. School children in the US recite the ledge of allegiance.
I can tell you from personal experience, when 30 children bleat "under God" in the morning, the sky does open up and a light fall down from the heavens.
The same sky opens, the same light falls whether it's children or sheep. Only the ego of Godbot's makes it into a special show, put on by the Creator of the Universe for your personal enjoyment. What an ego!
SupaAFC

Sheffield, UK

#44677 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the United KING.......dom a monarchy, yes or no?
Have you stopped raping children? Yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44678 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF is wrong with you, I have always acknowledged it exists
I'm not the one who is insisting the sun doesn't rise in the east.

I'm the one who said the United KING_dom is a monarchy, and you (et al.) are the ones insisting otherwise.

You want to pretend that uttering the words "under God" is some kind of Christian patronage in the USA but you live in a country that has a LAW requiring Christian worship in 'public' schools -actual PRAYER- and a country that has a STATE religion and a country whose head of state is the head of that state religion.

It's hard to take you seriously, Skanque.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44679 Dec 12, 2012
RHill wrote:
What an ego!
GotBot or NotBot: same kind of animal.
SupaAFC

Sheffield, UK

#44680 Dec 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prime Minister Macmillan...
Taking a break from responding only to your first of many convoluted posts to address another failure:

"The Queen appointed Macmillan Prime Minister after taking advice from Winston Churchill and Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 5th Marquess of Salisbury, who had asked the Cabinet individually for their opinions, all but two or three of them opting for Macmillan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Macmillan...

In other words, the Tory elite majority decided on Macmillan. The Queen, as per usual, rubber stamped it.
SupaAFC

Sheffield, UK

#44681 Dec 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Aww but it’s fun to make him rant his BS about things he is clueless about. However I am getting a little tired of showing him facts only for him to repeatedly effectively reply that’s not the answer he wanted because it does not agree with his wet dreams and hatred
The easiest way to deal with him is to respond only to his first post. Barefoot's tactic is to substitute quality with quantity so tries his upmost to overwhelm people with waves of posts that do not really differ much at all.

Barefoot: everybody's favourite manchild whack-a-mole.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44682 Dec 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Taking a break from responding only to your first of many convoluted posts to address another failure:
"The Queen appointed Macmillan Prime Minister after taking advice from Winston Churchill and Robert Gascoyne-Cecil...
GOSH!

Let's try to remember which one of us who was saying that the monarch APPOINTED the prime minister!!!!

Let me check...

Oh, that was me!

Wait, wait, that is that tricky definition of appointed that you (et al.) insisted was the "technically correct" meaning of the word...

And then you (et al.) INSISTED that the prime minister was ELECTED by the Parliament.

(putting aside, the PM is "elected" by part of the (sometimes) majority party of the hOUSE OF cOMMONS.

GOSH! there I go again... being..."factually" correct...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44683 Dec 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
In other words, the Tory elite majority decided
"decided"?

Please explain this "majority"!

!!!!!!!!!!

You mean... not elected?

Do tell!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 min thetruth 12,410
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 20 min dollarsbill 247,210
Proof of God for the Atheist 6 hr Uncle Sam 91
Atheism and Evidence of the Exodus 13 hr Amused 25
News As an atheist, how do I maintain my relationshi... 13 hr Amused 15
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 15 hr thetruth 2,352
News Muslim World and Secularism Tue P_Smith 1
More from around the web