In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 51423 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43507 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
You really don’t know much about the UK economy do you
Clearly I know more than you, dear, you want to insist the Concorde was "profitable" but you want to pretend the BILLIONS of dollars that were used to develop and build the Concorde fell from the sky.

Profit, you stupid skanque, means the Concorde would return more dollars than it cost.

Happy to see your PROOF that these tax dollars were return to French and UK tax payers.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#43508 Nov 22, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Official Name: Kingdom of Sweden
Government Type: Constitutional monarchy.
Head of State--King Carl XVI Gustaf
Sweden is a parliamentary democracy, which means that all public power proceeds from the people. At the national level, the people are represented by the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) which has legislative power. The Government implements the Riksdag's decisions and draws up proposals for new laws or law amendments.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43509 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
Let’s face it, the same model was used for the development of the US 2707. In the UK 700 companies and 25000 people and were employed on Concorde development project in the UK alone.
BILLIONS OF TAX DOLLARS, Skanque.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

"The development costs of Concorde were around £1.134 billion, which was funded by the UK and French governments. The cost to build the 16 production Concordes was £654 million of which £278 million was recovered through sales returns (this included spares, technical support, etc.). This debt was also funded by the 2 governments. "

Skanque:
Costs:£1.134 billion plus £654 million.
Minus:£278 million...

Hmmmmm.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#43510 Nov 22, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Official Name: Kingdom of Sweden
Government Type: Constitutional monarchy.
Head of State--King Carl XVI Gustaf
yup
nope
yup

http://www.government.se/sb/d/2853

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43511 Nov 22, 2012
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Just want you to know ... it's really tough watching someone's mind go like this. You are the one suggested "constitutional monarchy" as the more descriptive term for UK's government.
You will see I put QUOTES around the term as it is used by others, not by me.

But quotes or not: it is a monarchy- and a "constitutional" monarchy (that is to say, those monarchies that have a written constitution but that are monarchies) are still-- pay attention- MONARCHIES.

I understand: you NotBots are in the position of acknowledging (yet again) the facts support me, and not you.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#43512 Nov 22, 2012
Some people define democracy as securing less votes than your opposition but winning in a dubious court of law.(USA 2000)
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
Sweden is a parliamentary democracy, which means that all public power proceeds from the people. At the national level, the people are represented by the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) which has legislative power. The Government implements the Riksdag's decisions and draws up proposals for new laws or law amendments.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43513 Nov 22, 2012
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>

nope
Yep.

Explain what "Kingdom of Sweden" means.

Over here in the English-speaking world, it means that you are officially a kingdom meaning your head of state is a monarch.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#43514 Nov 22, 2012
So Sweden is a democracy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_d...
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Official Name: Kingdom of Sweden
Government Type: Constitutional monarchy.
Head of State--King Carl XVI Gustaf

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#43516 Nov 22, 2012
"Sweden's Head of State is the nations supreme representative but has no political powers."

http://www.government.se/sb/d/2853/a/21785

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#43517 Nov 22, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep.
Explain what "Kingdom of Sweden" means.
Over here in the English-speaking world, it means that you are officially a kingdom meaning your head of state is a monarch.
you love to be wrong all the time about sweden!

"Sweden is a parliamentary democracy, which means that all public power proceeds from the people. At the national level, the people are represented by the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) which has legislative power. The Government implements the Riksdag's decisions and draws up proposals for new laws or law amendments."

official state website http://www.government.se/sb/d/2853

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43518 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Concord was not subsidised when it was in commercial operation.
Of course it was.

BA bought the jets from the government for less than what they cost.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

The plan was for (up to, depending on which dreamer you care to quote) 1,500 airliners of which 20 were built of which 16 were actually used of which NINE were eventually sold at a loss.

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43519 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
The Boeing 2707 was a total loss for US tax payers, go suck a lemon
Total loss?

Compared to the loss of billions lost by UK & French taxpayers?

Feasibility studies are just that: investments to see if larger projects are viable. Some are; some are not.

The US Congress wisely withdrew from the project and we can look to the concorde as proof that they made the right decision.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43520 Nov 22, 2012
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
you love to be wrong all the time about sweden!
"Sweden is a parliamentary democracy,
Constitutional monarchy.

How many sites do I need to post?

Tell us again: what is the OFFICIAL NAME of Sweden.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#43521 Nov 22, 2012
Wrong.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it was.
BA bought the jets from the government for less than what they cost.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
The plan was for (up to, depending on which dreamer you care to quote) 1,500 airliners of which 20 were built of which 16 were actually used of which NINE were eventually sold at a loss.
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43522 Nov 22, 2012
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
you love to be wrong all the time about sweden!
"Sweden is a parliamentary democracy,
The government of North Korea insists it is a democracy as well.

What is the name of Sweden, again?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43523 Nov 22, 2012
Mikko wrote:
"Sweden's Head of State is the nations supreme representative but has no political powers."
Head of state...

Has certain meaning in the English language... maybe you lost it in translation.

What is the official name of Sweden again?

To be sure: the MONARCH in Sweden has less power than the MONARCH in the UK but the thing about the word MONARCH when used in the context of government is: if you have a MONARCH as your Head of State then you are in a MONARCHY.

Would you like for me to post the definition of the word "MONARCHY" yet again? to find a definition with fewer words?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43524 Nov 22, 2012
RHill wrote:
You are the first (perhaps in Human History) to bring "democratic monarchy" into a discussion.
How said you are unable to be able to maintain your concentration through entire sentences, it seems you are forever befuddled by conjunctions and unable to understand the context...

Ooops. Sorry... it seems I used a conjunction...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43525 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
British Airways said in the mid 80s that they would have bought
I'd buy a Dodge pick up truck if the US government paid for 90 percent of it...

Well... maybe 95 percent of it...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43526 Nov 22, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<
Say what? Maybe airfares are tax deductible in the US but they have NEVER been tax deductible in the UK
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

More of you defining what "is-is".

http://john-adams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/20...

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#43528 Nov 22, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Total loss?
Compared to the loss of billions lost by UK & French taxpayers?
Feasibility studies are just that: investments to see if larger projects are viable. Some are; some are not.
The US Congress wisely withdrew from the project and we can look to the concorde as proof that they made the right decision.
Interestingly enough there were orders for 122 of them when the project was cancelled.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 min Subduction Zone 70,372
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 6 min Eagle 12 3,821
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 18 min Eagle 12 30,414
News Atheists on the march in America (Aug '09) 14 hr greymouser 70,631
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 14 hr Eagle 12 258,476
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) Sat John 14,736
How To Get To Heaven When You Die Fri Eagle 12 87
More from around the web