In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,724

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Full Story

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43387 Nov 20, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
The Concorde was a flop the same way the shuttle was for us.
The shuttle wasn't a flop, moron.

Have you heard of the Hubble?

The Concorde was to governments interfering in a commercial enterprise that ended up FAILING.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43388 Nov 20, 2012
I miss the Shuttle flights. Very poignant seeing it move at a snails pace to its resting place as opposed to 17000mph.
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
The Concorde was a flop the same way the shuttle was for us.
It was not economically viable as planned.
It never turned a profit , and was a prestige symbol more than anything. It was however the most awesome public transportation
ever assembled.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43389 Nov 20, 2012
Of course the Shuttle was a flop.

It didn't make half the flights it was meant to.
It was vastly more expensive than projected.
There is a gap in its succession planning.

It was originally meant to be slimmer, which should've made it a safer reentry vehicle. The SRBs were meant to be one piece. Then the committees got to it. I also saw a design where the manned, reusable Shuttle was much smaller and the payload was to be sent up on cheap automated rockets to meet the astronauts. I believe that was vetoed by the military satellite requirements. Government intervention, eh?

I still miss the Shuttle and Concorde but at least they existed.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The shuttle wasn't a flop, moron.
Have you heard of the Hubble?
The Concorde was to governments interfering in a commercial enterprise that ended up FAILING.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43390 Nov 20, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
It was not economically viable as planned.
The shuttle was NEVER planned to be "economically viable" commercial product- it was designed to be a multiple use space vehicle. There were 135 flights and if you look up in the sky a a dark night, you can see the space station that was built using shuttle.

The Concorde was funded by the governments of UK and France for the express purpose of making money.

It failed.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43391 Nov 20, 2012
No, not the legal definition. Just the definition, angry one.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engl...
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
How parochial of you to insist on the British legal definition, spooge breath.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43392 Nov 20, 2012
Wrong.
If you miss your targets, you're a flop.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The shuttle was NEVER planned to be "economically viable" commercial product- it was designed to be a multiple use space vehicle. There were 135 flights and if you look up in the sky a a dark night, you can see the space station that was built using shuttle.
The Concorde was funded by the governments of UK and France for the express purpose of making money.
It failed.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#43393 Nov 20, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
Been married to a woman or ten , for more my life
than not. Always had one , or two.
But I do know exactly what you mean.
Marriage is like playing cards:

You start off with two hearts and a diamond.

You end up wanting a club and a spade.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43394 Nov 20, 2012
That makes my flight on Concorde even more special to me.

PS Boeing has been supported by the US taxpayer.
barefoot2626 wrote:
737's built without tax funding = 7,000+
Concordes built without tax funding = ZERO.
Including those built with British & French taxes (total)= 20.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#43395 Nov 20, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The shuttle wasn't a flop, moron.
Have you heard of the Hubble?
The Concorde was to governments interfering in a commercial enterprise that ended up FAILING.
The shuttle was a great tool with redeeming qualities , but was a flop in the economically viable department . Same as concord.
The shuttle was built on the premise it would be cheaper to refurbish reusable parts to make a continual space launch system to launch systems into low orbit. It proved to be false.
That's why it has been canned.

It's cheaper to build expendable hardware, and toss it .
But also in a way , like the Concorde it was the most awesome space launch system ever sassembled.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#43396 Nov 20, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Of course the Shuttle was a flop.
It didn't make half the flights it was meant to.
It was vastly more expensive than projected.
There is a gap in its succession planning.
It was originally meant to be slimmer, which should've made it a safer reentry vehicle. The SRBs were meant to be one piece. Then the committees got to it. I also saw a design where the manned, reusable Shuttle was much smaller and the payload was to be sent up on cheap automated rockets to meet the astronauts. I believe that was vetoed by the military satellite requirements. Government intervention, eh?
I still miss the Shuttle and Concorde but at least they existed.
<quoted text>
Yeah man ^^
But the next generation by NASA will demand attention also.
Your country is involved also.

http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/

It will be the most powerful rocket system yet devised, and designed to take men to Mars and beyond.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43397 Nov 20, 2012
I'm also really excited by the Skylon engines being tested near me- now that could bring reusable spaceplanes back to our skies.

Too many useless wars eating up space research money!
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Yeah man ^^
But the next generation by NASA will demand attention also.
Your country is involved also.
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/
It will be the most powerful rocket system yet devised, and designed to take men to Mars and beyond.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43398 Nov 20, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> The shuttle was a great tool with redeeming qualities , but was a flop in the economically viable department .
Repeating the same nonsense ad nauseum doesn't make true.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43399 Nov 20, 2012
Thinking wrote:
That makes my flight on Concorde even more special to me.
PS Boeing has been supported by the US taxpayer.
Nope.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#43400 Nov 20, 2012
Thinking wrote:
I'm also really excited by the Skylon engines being tested near me- now that could bring reusable spaceplanes back to our skies.
Too many useless wars eating up space research money!
<quoted text>
War is sadly the death of us all , dreams included.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#43401 Nov 20, 2012
And it seems they are determined we must wage this war with Iran.

They will decide our fate without a vote , but I can only hope humanity can resolve it's differences without the much anticipated hostilities .
In general we as a species have bigger worries than our inherit inability to co-exist peacefully. Hopefully we can overcome this shortfall before too late.

Some think it will take the discovery we are not alone in the universe to form any unity.

If that's the case ...then praise be to the ufo conspirators.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#43402 Nov 20, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Repeating the same nonsense ad nauseum doesn't make true.
What that the failure of the shuttle program was due to it being economically unviable? That is a reality we had to face , and one for the history books.

That's why the SLS system of expendable rockets was reborn.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43403 Nov 20, 2012
If only the US and the UK hadn't pushed over the Iranian democracy in 1951 on behalf of our oil interests, Iran would probably be very like Turkey today.

We don't half make things difficult for ourselves, sometimes.
Aura Mytha wrote:
And it seems they are determined we must wage this war with Iran.
They will decide our fate without a vote , but I can only hope humanity can resolve it's differences without the much anticipated hostilities .
In general we as a species have bigger worries than our inherit inability to co-exist peacefully. Hopefully we can overcome this shortfall before too late.
Some think it will take the discovery we are not alone in the universe to form any unity.
If that's the case ...then praise be to the ufo conspirators.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#43404 Nov 20, 2012
Well stop doing it, then.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Repeating the same nonsense ad nauseum doesn't make true.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#43405 Nov 20, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
Your country is involved also.
Right, because we know that someone showing posts for UK must be from the UK.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#43406 Nov 20, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't need to.
Do let me know when you learn the difference between direct voting, indirect voting, and not ever- never- getting to vote or any say at all.
I voted for the POTUS/VPOTUS two weeks ago.
Let us know when you get new meds for your severe OCD.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 6 min Gordon 227,554
Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns 1 hr woodtick57 100
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 1 hr emperorjohn 22,217
Atheists forgetting the meaning of freedom 2 hr Thinking 77
Introducing The Universal Religion (Feb '14) 5 hr Patrick 758
Stump a theist with 2 questions 6 hr TheHeadlines 58
An atheist returns to Christ (Jan '09) 6 hr TheHeadlines 4,093
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••