In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,724

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Full Story

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40289 Oct 12, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<
Honey I personally lost over £80K (not dollars but pounds so itís around $128/129K at todayís prices) in the banking meltdown.
You know how much US citizen's lost from savings accounts in failed banks?

Not a nickle.

Who's fault is it your government(s) don't do a better job of regulating your own banks?

PS: How many years was Barclay's inflating interest rates?

Since: Mar 11

Florence, KY

#40290 Oct 12, 2012
Zing!
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Too much wacky baccy will do that to you, especially if you get the cheap crap they sell at the entrance to your trailer park
SupaAFC

Crieff, UK

#40291 Oct 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
There are no citizens in Britain: You are subjects.
Now that is a FACT.
And as "subjects" we vote like you guys do, we shop like you guys do, we work like you guys do, we play sports like you guys do, we argue on internet forums like you guys do, we watch the same movies that you guys do, we hear about the same celebrities that you guys do, we have news stations like you guys do, we can protest like you guys do, etc, etc, etc.

So, for living lives as "subjects", we sure don't seem to have it anywhere near as bad compared to you "citizens".

Could it just be, Barefoot, that you are running with a big red herring?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And I don't care how you interpret anything: I am not responsible for you jumping to conclusions.
Of course you are responsible. You are the one who wrote the post in vague language!
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
There are two houses in the UK parliament. It isn't my fault that you were not aware of this.
Members of the Commons are called MPs and members of the Lords are called Lords. It isn't my fault that you were not specific with which house you meant.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
No is it my fault that you had to LIE when you changed what I said to try to explain away how you got confused.
Not once did I "change" what you said. I read it the same way any British person would.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Lords who make up the House of Lords are members.
English.
And Lords are selected through numerous nominations or peerage systems, none of which include the CoE as the decision maker.

That includes the Lords Spiritual.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not my fault you are so ignorant of your own government that you were unaware that the phrase "members of Parliament" include (and in fact, more likely since there are more members in the House of Lords than House of Commons) Lords, especially, Lords Spiritual.
Yes, how dare I stupidly believe that when you said "members of parliament" you were not talking about, you know, MPs, but about the Lords instead.

Nobody, Barefoot, buys that you "meant" the Lords. It is beyond obvious that you have changed your argument.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And it is rather transparent when YOU CHANGED what I said ("members of Parliament") to (capitalized) "Members of Parliament" and then quickly added "MPs" and then insisted that I meant House of Commons.
If I have changed the capitalisation then show me my post where I have quoted you with the letters changed.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a liar.
You are the one still pretending that the Lords, including the Lords Spiritual, are appointed by the CoE.

You know, the central point of your red herring argument.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can get all your NotBots waving banners but I want you know I am calling you out for the lying pusssy you are.
You can pretend that your ranting and raving about British politics and the CoE is true, let alone even relevant in 21st century society, but I want you to know I am calling you out for the lying pusssy you are.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40292 Oct 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
And as "subjects" we vote like you guys do,
ya don't, and I don't have to keep reminding that you don't.

We here vote for the members of both of our houses, and we vote for the head of state.

You don't. You vote only for the members of the lower house, and you do not vote on who will be your PM.

And the members of the House of Lords are appointed or inherit their positions (and appointed by the monarch who is also the head of the state religion).

And the monarch can dismiss the government if she/he is so inclined.

Let me know when you come up with something new...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40293 Oct 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
Not once did I "change" what you said.
Of course, you are a liar.

E.G.: changing "members of Parliament" to Members of Parliament (MPs).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40294 Oct 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
You are the one still pretending that the Lords, including the Lords Spiritual, are appointed by the CoE.
No pretense needed.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40295 Oct 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
Nobody, Barefoot, buys that you "meant" the Lords.
I said it many times.

You can deny it a million times, Sweetgums. Whjat you can't find- no matter how hard you look- is me saying MPs were appointed.

I have things to do, if you could prove it, you would have a month ago.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40296 Oct 12, 2012
SupaAFC wrote:
Yes, how dare I stupidly believe that when you said "members of parliament" you were not talking about, you know, MPs, but about the Lords instead.
(quote)

"Members of the House of Lords"

Your guide to who's who in the House of Lords.

You often hear about Members of Parliament - or MPs - on TV or in the newspapers. Each MP belongs to the House of Commons. But MPs aren't the only people who work in the Houses of Parliament.

There are over 700 men and women who make up Parliament's second chamber: the House of Lords.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40297 Oct 12, 2012
All-Party Groups

All-Party Groups (APGs) are informal cross-party groups that have no official status within Parliament. They are essentially run by and for Members of the Commons and Lords.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40298 Oct 12, 2012
Members of the House of Lords

Often with long careers in public service, business, arts and culture, or another area of activity, Members of the House of Lords contribute their expertise and knowledge to Parliament and its work.

Find out more about Members of the Lords, including their biographical and contact details. The options in the drop down menu allow you to search the list alphabetically, by political party or group and by gender.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40299 Oct 12, 2012
http://www.parliament.uk/

Members of the House of Lords

Find out about their experience, knowledge and subjects of interest.

List of Members of the House of Lords

Members of the House of Lords

Often with long careers in public service, business, arts and culture, or another area of activity, Members of the House of Lords contribute their expertise and knowledge to Parliament and its work.

Find out more about Members of the Lords, including their biographical and contact details. The options in the drop down menu allow you to search the list alphabetically, by political party or group and by gender.

(clip)

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#40300 Oct 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I said it many times.
You can deny it a million times, Sweetgums. Whjat you can't find- no matter how hard you look- is me saying MPs were appointed.
I have things to do, if you could prove it, you would have a month ago.
Barefoot , you are a pretty intelligent guy , and seem to be well informed. My only question is why the trivial pursuit to the love of argument? You seem to love to state these trivial topic peeves and assume a position to defend like Hector.
Just seems an odd demeanor and way to respond to everyone.
I guess you just love a good argument huh?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40301 Oct 12, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
I guess you just love a good argument huh?
I guess you are here learning to speak English as a second language, huh?

Since: Mar 11

Hurst, TX

#40302 Oct 12, 2012
He has no friends in the real world without this he would have committed suicide years ago.
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Barefoot , you are a pretty intelligent guy , and seem to be well informed. My only question is why the trivial pursuit to the love of argument? You seem to love to state these trivial topic peeves and assume a position to defend like Hector.
Just seems an odd demeanor and way to respond to everyone.
I guess you just love a good argument huh?

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#40303 Oct 12, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
He has no friends in the real world without this he would have committed suicide years ago.
<quoted text>
He needs to get a job in here....

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#40304 Oct 12, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> He needs to get a job in here...
You are at your wittiest when you have to steal other people's work from YouTube.

Or funny pictures from your porn sites.

Since: Mar 11

Hurst, TX

#40305 Oct 13, 2012
Yes he would fit right in there! Double funny because he said his computer can't run YouTube videos! Lmfao!

Sad pathetic loser I bet each day that revolver looks better and better when he puts it up to his temple.
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> He needs to get a job in here....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =kQFKtI6gn9YXX
wolverine

Greeley, CO

#40307 Oct 13, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Even Palin laughs at birthers.
But then...'your' an idiot.
When The Truth Finally Comes Out....I Personally Am Going To Bitch Slap Every Idiot Who Voted For The Muslim.
wolverine

Greeley, CO

#40308 Oct 13, 2012
According to CNN, the Vice Presidential debate goes to Republican, Paul Ryan by a margin of 48% to 44%. This brings Republicans to two consecutive wins based off the CNN polling data. Even though Vice President Joe Biden had been pulled off the campaign trail to prepare for this debate, it seems that did little to secure a victory for Democrats.
wolverine

Greeley, CO

#40309 Oct 13, 2012
According to the CNN poll of independents, Paul Ryan won the debate, 48% to 44%. The same poll showed that people who watched the debate believed that Paul Ryan expressed himself better than Joe Biden, 50%-41%. An NBC poll of 435 uncommitted voters after the debate showed Paul Ryan winning with 63% to 31%. CNBC had it 56% to 36%, again with Paul Ryan coming out on top. Even the Danville Advocate Messenger had Paul Ryan on top at the end of the day, attracting 56% to Biden's 41%.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns 40 min woodtick57 36
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 1 hr fadu singh 21,904
An atheist returns to Christ (Jan '09) 1 hr Patrick 4,083
How much faith it takes to believe in Evolution. 2 hr Patrick 176
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr Eagle 12 227,297
What Bums Me Out Most About Being an Atheist 2 hr californio 88
The Ultimate Evidence of God 4 hr susanblange 119
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••