The burden is upon anyone who makes a positive claim, be they atheist or theist.Repeats the idiot who doesn't understand that the burden of proof lies upon theists to prove their god and not upon atheists to disprove it.
Man, you hate irony meters.This is a stupid lie.
Spoken like a fundamentalist.
The evidence shows otherwise. If you now wish to recant your previous positions and accept the moon-landings occurred and that lizards do in fact exist then that's your perogative. Do you wish to change your previous position?This is an entirely unsubstantiated accusation based on no evidence. I don't deny the moon landings and I don't deny that lizards exist, and I never have, and anyone can read your links and work this out.
You are stupid for repeating this claim, based on evidence you've presented to the contrary.
True, however since I did in fact present evidence, and further, you never bothered to respond, this is a moo point. In fact it's your inability to address what I actually say which has gotten you into all this trouble in the first place. Until you actually address the concept of falsifiability and its importance in science and the scientific method I don't see it likely that anything will change.Once again, this behaviour explains your desperate lack of understanding of the burden of proof:
1. Just because you accuse me of denying the moon landings, does NOT make it true. Because I choose not to reply to your claims does NOT make your claim true.
2. The burden of proof requires YOU to present evidence that I deny the moon landings - and has nothing to do with me NOT REPLYING to your stupid accusations.
Of the two of us, I have not lied. You have since you have made a positive claim. And I've specifically pointed out what it was and why. Multiple times. Over two years.Atheists DO NOT make positive claims. Atheism is the conclusion after idiot theists and agnostics like yourself have been EXPOSED for lying about the possibility of god.
You deliberately try not to face up to this fact, because you are dishonest at arguing.
And atheists are not people? Since you said atheists make no positive claims. And as it turns out, you, who happen to be atheist, made a positive claim that a non-falsifiable concept had been falsified. After two years I am still waiting for you to back up this claim.Nobody is debating whether or not people* make positive claims. We are debating SPECIFICALLY about the claim of *god*.
No, claims are okay as long as they can be backed up by evidence. Doesn't matter who they are.This is a classic tactic used by creationist propaganda merchants, to look at a claim RELATIVE to a wider CLAIM -*everyone makes claims - therefore claims are ok* BULLSH*T.
See? This is what I'm talking about. Not addressing what I say and merely repeating your original claim along with an insult. THAT is a classic tactic used by creationist propaganda merchants.Its already falsified you blithering idiot.
Its been falsified you blithering idiot.
Good. Then you do not deny that you're a fundie.Again, nobody is arguing this.