Insane! DOJ Declares Atheism A "Relig...

Insane! DOJ Declares Atheism A "Religious Movement",...

There are 1726 comments on the Gateway Pundit story from Aug 28, 2013, titled Insane! DOJ Declares Atheism A "Religious Movement",.... In it, Gateway Pundit reports that:

Is the DOJ collectively inhaling something toxic? The U.S. Justice Department has just identified atheism as a "religious movement" .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Gateway Pundit.

Thinking

Merthyr Tydfil, UK

#1726 Nov 22, 2013
The fact that Lincunt has to reach out to unhappy scum like siro speaks volumes.
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>That's a mirror that you are looking at.
Siro

Ryde, Australia

#1727 Nov 22, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>That's a mirror that you are looking at.
A mirror?
Thats something you should get and use everyday.
Youll be able to measure the loss of dignity through your face because you come here and hangout with cucks like Thinking and tards like skeptic.
So I strongly recommend you buy one (its never too late for a first time) and use it (again, never too late)

btw....have a shave while youre at it
LCNLin

United States

#1731 Nov 22, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
OCD? No Im leaning towards aspergers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrom...
.
No doubt the topix marxists..er....atheists play on his syndrome and wind him up to do what he does.
Topix atheists/marxists like bob QF have always catered to crackpots in order to make themselves look like saviours
posting from England and funny at that.

God Save The Queen
Amused

Lowell, MA

#1732 Nov 22, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
posting from England and funny at that.
God Save The Queen
Siro isn't posting from England. He's posting from Australia. You know, the place England used to send its convicts.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#1733 Nov 22, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>Show me sport, show me the proof that I said Jesus rode dinosaurs, as you claimed- still waiting for that one. Show me how easy it is to prove something you made claim to. Show me how I claimed evolution is wrong. Waiting for that one as well. C'mon, sheldon wannabe, put that mighty brain to work and prove either iddy bitty thing you've claimed- should be e-a-s-y peezy for you...
Well evolution is not consistent with your bible's ridiculous story of Adam and Eve.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#1734 Nov 22, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
A mirror?
Thats something you should get and use everyday.
Youll be able to measure the loss of dignity through your face because you come here and hangout with cucks like Thinking and tards like skeptic.
So I strongly recommend you buy one (its never too late for a first time) and use it (again, never too late)
btw....have a shave while youre at it
LCNLin seems on a mission to trash any opinion with which she/he does not agree - OCD? He is very much not unlike yourself.
Can you see yourself in heaven harvesting hemmorhoids and foreskins to make your god happy? Oh happy day, right?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#1735 Nov 22, 2013
Thinking wrote:
The fact that Lincunt has to reach out to unhappy scum like siro speaks volumes.
<quoted text>
Grasping at straws, always.
Siro

Ryde, Australia

#1737 Nov 23, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>LCNLin seems on a mission to trash any opinion with which she/he does not agree - OCD? He is very much not unlike yourself.
Can you see yourself in heaven harvesting hemmorhoids and foreskins to make your god happy? Oh happy day, right?
I dont need to go to heaven to harvest hemmorhoids and foreskins.
I just come here and can harvest them from the dumper crop of topix atheists.
HA! HA!......youre a douche!

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#1738 Nov 23, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
More pointless essays from religious liars with no proof of god and no morals to speak of .
Another pointless comment from a poster who cannot prove his claims. Just a prejudiced hypocrite who demands others provide proof, yet cannot prove his own words.
Siro

Sydney, Australia

#1739 Nov 23, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
I will post you a haystack so you can grasp some more straws Lincoln.
He brings up the queen because he has no proof of god. The desperation wall has been pushed to the max...
I bring up the only queen I know......you!
Sucks to be you Bad Boy Bubby.....
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#1740 Nov 23, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>Another pointless comment from a poster who cannot prove his claims. Just a prejudiced hypocrite who demands others provide proof, yet cannot prove his own words.
You can't define a god and prove that it exists, so it would seem foolish to believe such tripe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell 's_teapot

Religion = superstition
Siro

Ryde, Australia

#1741 Nov 23, 2013
EdSed wrote:
<quoted text>You can't define a god and prove that it exists, so it would seem foolish to believe such tripe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell 's_teapot
Religion = superstition
From .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teap...

Philosopher Paul Chamberlain says it is logically erroneous to assert that positive truth claims bear a burden of proof while negative truth claims do not.[11] He says that all truth claims bear a burden of proof, and that like Mother Goose and the tooth fairy, the teapot bears the greater burden not because of its negativity, but because of its triviality, arguing that "When we substitute normal, serious characters such as Plato, Nero, Winston Churchill, or George Washington in place of these fictional characters, it becomes clear that anyone denying the existence of these figures has a burden of proof equal to, or in some cases greater than, the person claiming they do exist." [11]

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#1742 Nov 23, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
From .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teap...
Philosopher Paul Chamberlain says it is logically erroneous to assert that positive truth claims bear a burden of proof while negative truth claims do not.[11] He says that all truth claims bear a burden of proof, and that like Mother Goose and the tooth fairy, the teapot bears the greater burden not because of its negativity, but because of its triviality, arguing that "When we substitute normal, serious characters such as Plato, Nero, Winston Churchill, or George Washington in place of these fictional characters, it becomes clear that anyone denying the existence of these figures has a burden of proof equal to, or in some cases greater than, the person claiming they do exist." [11]
Argument from authority fallacy
Thinking

Merthyr Tydfil, UK

#1743 Nov 23, 2013
Agreed. Philosophy is rarely scientific.
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
Argument from authority fallacy

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#1744 Nov 23, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont need to go to heaven to harvest hemmorhoids and foreskins.
I just come here and can harvest them from the dumper crop of topix atheists.
HA! HA!......youre a douche!
Hey, nothing like pleasing your god. Personally, I think that you'd be in your element accomplishing either task. 200 foreskins is the number your god likes, and the hemorrhoids need to dipped in molten gold. Nobody will be able to beat your offerings.

Ha, ha! You are a religitard.
LCNLin

United States

#1745 Nov 23, 2013
^ don't be modest regarding your retarded posts.
Siro

Ryde, Australia

#1746 Nov 23, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Agreed. Philosophy is rarely scientific.
<quoted text>
Atheists peddle both philosophy and science as being simultaneously true at the same time.

Judged:

22

19

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
LCNLin

United States

#1747 Nov 24, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheists peddle both philosophy and science as being simultaneously true at the same time.
Agnostics make more sense but atheist add humor to the discussion?
LCNLin

United States

#1748 Nov 24, 2013
Agnostics make more sense but *atheists* add humor to the discussion?
Siro

Sydney, Australia

#1749 Nov 24, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
Agnostics make more sense but *atheists* add humor to the discussion?
*atheists*= topix atheists
Yeah.....theyre always good for a laugh..
Theyre not good for anything else...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 32 min lightbeamrider 1,751
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 3 hr nanoanomaly 27,240
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 128
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 57,830
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 4 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 5,954
god belief down to 28% in UK 7 hr Eagle 12 123
carbon 14 dating very inaccurate (Jun '12) 7 hr Eagle 12 72
More from around the web