Will atheists win the fight?

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#431 May 5, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
And it's so cool that QM fails so by scientific definition it is no longer a viable scientific Theory.
If that is the case why is your PC working?

So tell us all again, what training in any science do you have?

I always find it funny when godbots with NO scientific education tell us how science does not work.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#432 May 5, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
And it's so cool that QM fails so by scientific definition it is no longer a viable scientific Theory.
You have literally left your brains out in the sun too long.

Quantum Mechanics is a well-tested theory and has withstood ALL the tests thrown at it and more.

It also proves beyond a doubt that your "omniscient" god cannot exist-- at all, ever.

If your god is real? It is not omniscient-- which makes it a pretty lame-duck godling.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#433 May 5, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
If that is the case why is your PC working?
So tell us all again, what training in any science do you have?
I always find it funny when godbots with NO scientific education tell us how science does not work.
I think he left his brains out in the sun too long-- they've become cooked...

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#434 May 5, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he left his brains out in the sun too long-- they've become cooked...
What f...ing brain?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#435 May 5, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
And it's so cool that QM fails so by scientific definition it is no longer a viable scientific Theory.
When did you get the impression that QM fails?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#436 May 5, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
What f...ing brain?
LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#437 May 5, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
When did you get the impression that QM fails?
Alas, it wasn't the theory of Quantum Mechanics that has failed...

... it was his understanding that failed.

:)

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#438 May 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Alas, it wasn't the theory of Quantum Mechanics that has failed...
... it was his understanding that failed.
:)
Doesn't something have to exist to fail?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#439 May 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't something have to exist to fail?
:)

Well... not necessarily. If something never happens at all? You could correctly call that a failure.

That is, if your average godbot has never bothered to study even a LITTLE quantum mechanics?

Then that is a failure of understanding--for lack of even trying.

So theoretically, their understanding is both a failure, and did not exist, at the same time.

:D
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#440 May 8, 2013
Bill just can't get it right:

" http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013... ;

I wonder if Bill will issue an apology for hurting the feelings of billions of muslims?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#441 May 8, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
Bill just can't get it right:
" http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013... ;
I wonder if Bill will issue an apology for hurting the feelings of billions of muslims?
How is that Pedophile Priest Ring working out for you?

I understand there is a HUGE fund of cash-money to hush up the victims now.

And you keep paying INTO that fund, too....!
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#442 May 8, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
Bill just can't get it right:
" http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013... ;
I wonder if Bill will issue an apology for hurting the feelings of billions of muslims?
Bill should take islam sensitivity training.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#443 May 8, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill should take islam sensitivity training.
How is that Pedophile Priest Ring working out for you?

I understand there is a HUGE fund of cash-money to hush up the victims now.

And you keep paying INTO that fund, too....!
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#444 May 9, 2013
From the link below: "As liberals will find out—if they succeed in de-Christianization, as they largely have in Europe—the enemy of my enemy will not prove to be a friend. Liberal culture and Islamic Sharia law are on opposite ends on nearly everything. If they both succeed in extinguishing Christianity, they will only have to face each other."

" http://www.humanevents.com/2013/05/09/why-are... ;

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#445 May 9, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
From the link below: "As liberals will find out—if they succeed in de-Christianization, as they largely have in Europe—the enemy of my enemy will not prove to be a friend. Liberal culture and Islamic Sharia law are on opposite ends on nearly everything. If they both succeed in extinguishing Christianity, they will only have to face each other."
" http://www.humanevents.com/2013/05/09/why-are... ;
Brain damage. There is no getting around this: you have religious brain damage.

So severe, you cannot learn anything.

Pathetic.
KJV

United States

#446 May 9, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>If that is the case why is your PC working?

So tell us all again, what training in any science do you have?

I always find it funny when godbots with NO scientific education tell us how science does not work.
Oh are you trying to say that because a theory fails in one area then it fails in all area? Pretty dumb.

However a scientific theory MUST NEVER be prove false, or it will not remain a scientific theory.

Do you understand the the rules of a scientific theory? Guess not looking at your stupid post.
KJV

United States

#447 May 9, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>You have literally left your brains out in the sun too long.

Quantum Mechanics is a well-tested theory and has withstood ALL the tests thrown at it and more.

It also proves beyond a doubt that your "omniscient" god cannot exist-- at all, ever.

If your god is real? It is not omniscient-- which makes it a pretty lame-duck godling.
"Quantum Mechanics is a well-tested theory and has withstood ALL the tests"

Now pay close attention here bobby,

"Wikipedia:
If anyone finds a case where all or part of a scientific theory is false, then that theory is either changed or thrown out.

A scientific theory in one branch of science must hold true in all of the other branches of science.

BRIAN GREENE: It's a little known secret but for more than half a century a dark cloud has been looming over modern science. Here's the problem: our understanding of the universe is based on two separate theories. One is Einstein's general theory of relativity—that's a way of understanding the biggest things in the universe, things like stars and galaxies. But the littlest things in the universe, atoms and subatomic particles, play by an entirely different set of rules called, "quantum Mechanics"

These two sets of rules are each incredibly accurate in their own domain but whenever we try to combine them, to solve some of the deepest mysteries in the universe, disaster strikes.

Take the beginning of the universe, the "big bang." At that instant a tiny nugget erupted violently. Over the next 14 billion years the universe expanded and cooled into the stars, galaxies and planets we see today. But if we run the cosmic film in reverse, everything that's now rushing apart comes back together, so the universe gets smaller, hotter and denser as we head back to the beginning of time.

As we reach the big bang, when the universe was both enormously heavy and incredibly tiny, our projector jams. Our two laws of physics, when combined, break down."

From Nova:

"For decades, every attempt to describe the force of gravity in the same language as the other forces—the language of quantum mechanics—has met with disaster

S. JAMES GATES, JR.: You try to put those two pieces of mathematics together, they do not coexist peacefully.

S. JAMES GATES, JR.: The laws of nature are supposed to apply everywhere. So if Einstein's laws are supposed to apply everywhere, and the laws of quantum mechanics are supposed to apply everywhere, well you can't have two separate everywheres.

RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: In the years since, physics split into two separate camps: one that uses general relativity to study big and heavy objects, things like stars, galaxies and the universe as a whole...

LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE:...and another that uses quantum mechanics to study the tiniest of objects, like atoms and particles. This has been kind of like having two families that just cannot get along and never talk to each other...

LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: There just seemed to be no way to combine quantum mechanics...

RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE:...and general relativity in a single theory that could describe the universe on all scales.

So here's the question: if you're trying to figure out what happens in the depths of a black hole, where an entire star is crushed to a tiny speck, do you use general relativity because the star is incredibly heavy or quantum mechanics because it's incredibly tiny?

Well, that's the problem. Since the center of a black hole is both tiny and heavy, you can't avoid using both theories at the same time. And when we try to put the two theories together in the realm of black holes, they conflict. It breaks down. They give nonsensical predictions. And the universe is not nonsensical; it's got to make sense.
KJV

United States

#448 May 9, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>When did you get the impression that QM fails?
Wikipedia:
If anyone finds a case where all or part of a scientific theory is false, then that theory is either changed or thrown out.

A scientific theory in one branch of science must hold true in all of the other branches of science.
KJV

United States

#449 May 9, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>Doesn't something have to exist to fail?
Wow you are now all proven fools

That was too easy.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#450 May 9, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
Oh are you trying to say that because a theory fails in one area then it fails in all area? Pretty dumb.
However a scientific theory MUST NEVER be prove false, or it will not remain a scientific theory.
Do you understand the the rules of a scientific theory? Guess not looking at your stupid post.[/QUOTE]

Brain damage. There is no getting around this: you have religious brain damage.

So severe, you cannot learn anything.

Pathetic.`

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 11 min Chimney1 43,201
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 35 min It aint necessari... 18,550
News Why I quit atheism 8 hr Eagle 12 708
Good arguments against Christianity 11 hr superwilly 209
A Universe from Nothing? 12 hr Mikko 533
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 17 hr Thinking 5,696
Atheism is a mental illness 17 hr Eagle 12 11
More from around the web