Atheism and homosexuality

Atheism and homosexuality

There are 3861 comments on the Conservapedia story from Dec 5, 2011, titled Atheism and homosexuality. In it, Conservapedia reports that:

Creationist scientists and creationist assert that the theory of evolution cannot account for the origin of gender and sexual reproduction.http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/136http://www.answersingenesis.org/pbs_nova/0928ep5.asp [[Creation Ministries International]] states: "Homosexual acts go against [[God]]'s original [[Intelligent design ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Conservapedia.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3190 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
When atheists say "There is no god" they as well are making the claim based on ZERO evidence.
How can one test for God to have evidence for or against?
Wrong its based on your LACK OF EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIM stupid!

The burden of proof lies upon the idiot who makes the positive claim - you are claiming there is a god, something material where there was not before, you are making this claim.

Why are you creationist so f*cking dumb? why???

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3191 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
Yes Skeptic turn to the judgits because you have nothing else you pathetic little ranting troll. LOL
Fact is God can neither be proven or disproven and in your world, any one that says God is false is just as stupid as anyone saying God is real.
Wrong your god is disproven:

1. It is antiscientific in its concept
2. There is no evidence for the existence of god
3. There are mountains of strong evidence against your specific god.
4. There are mountains of strong evidence for evolution.

You fail when you try to lie about atheism. Atheism makes no claims, it is simple disbelief in YOUR CLAIMS ie. religious lies that YOU decided to tell but COULDN'T back up!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3192 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Your mistake is I never said God is real. I said I believe in God. My believes are real based on what I feel. YOU said God is NOT real so it is up to you to back your claim.
You believe god is real, based on feeling, which is basically the definition of the mental illness you suffer from.

You have suffered a break from reality and are deluded. This is not the problem of atheists.

Why do you project your religious problem upon atheists who do not suffer from your personal mental illness ?

Why do you do this?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3193 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Again your mistake is I never said God is real. I said I believe in God. My believes are real based on what I feel. YOU said God is NOT real so it is up to you to back your claim.
Repeating your false claim does nothing to support it. God isn't real regardless of what you feel is true.

At some time you need to grow / wake the f*ck up.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3194 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know if God is real or not. I believe he is. I don't know if you are real. So what is your point.
You meander and avoid the obvious point - you have no evidence and are lying.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3195 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Where have I justified my stand on one man and one woman marriage with religion or creationism? Why don't you respond to the actual arguments instead of making up this creationism strawman?
Is it mental illness to see creationism in every critic?
Creationism is no excuse for preventing gay from marrying Brian.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#3196 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
Yes Skeptic turn to the judgits because you have nothing else you pathetic little ranting troll. LOL
Fact is God can neither be proven or disproven and in your world, any one that says God is false is just as stupid as anyone saying God is real.
If I tell you that all cakes in the world are blue, and you disagree with me, is it fair for me to to say you have made a "positive claim"? and you must now run around collecting every non-blue cake in the world as evidence for your positive claim?

Of course not, it is my job to prove all cakes are blue. And I will fail.

Its astonishing that you base your entire worldview on this exact faulty logic!!

Look up the burden of proof before typing please.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#3197 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Many scientists are theist. You claim and I quote "there is no God". Where is your evidence that God does not exist? That is your claim and with all claim you have to back it up with evidence.
Simple. Let's describe god. Without an agreed upon description, there can't be a real debate. God is all powerful, all knowing, and has a set of rules he wants us to know (even if those rules are just "Repent and accept Jesus"). Here is a clear fact, people have conflicting views on these rules. And since the views conflict, they can't all be right. So, if we assume god has a set of rules he wants us to know, we can clearly see he hasn't let us all know them. Why not? Maybe he doesn't have the ability. If that's the case, he's not god. Or maybe he doesn't have rules he wants us to know. If that's the case, he's not god.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#3198 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
When atheists say "There is no god" they as well are making the claim based on ZERO evidence.
How can one test for God to have evidence for or against?
Define/describe god.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#3199 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Not even going to bother, stupid, I can tell by looking the links they don't provide any examples of what I'm asking about. I'm talking about ATTENDING a gay wedding. About a Christian being invited to a gay wedding, and then not going, and then being sued. I'm not talking about providing commercial services.
If a Christian photographer or florist, or baker, or whatever, said they wouldn't provide commercial services for my wedding because it would be interracial, I just take those thousands of dollars someplace else. And I'd remind the of that from time to time. Maybe put interracial porn on their web site, but I wouldn't bother to sue.(Remember the only argument made against interracial marriage in Loving v VA was that (the Christian) god was against it.)

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#3200 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
How can one test for God to have evidence for or against?
I will even go first again.
There is no test ot tests that can or can not prove God. So anyone saying God is false, by your logic is just as stupid as anyone saying God is real. You are just too effin stupid to realize that being you are a ranting troll.
It's clear you don't understand logic. You admit there is no evidence for a god. So, why even consider the idea?
Claude

Montréal, Canada

#3201 Oct 29, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear you don't understand logic. You admit there is no evidence for a god. So, why even consider the idea?
He old big d!ck! How's that monster hanging today?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#3202 Oct 29, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Creationism is no excuse for preventing gay from marrying Brian.
And it's not on my list either.

Here's a reason from religion, used by Senator Obama in 2008:

http://www.clipsandcomment.com/2008/08/17/ful...
WARREN: There’s a lot more I’d like to ask on that. We have 15 other questions here. Define marriage.
OBAMA: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian — for me — for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.

Here's then Senator Biden's argument for keeping marriage one man and one woman:

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/de...
IFILL: Let's try to avoid nuance, Senator. Do you support gay marriage?

BIDEN: No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be able to be able to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#3203 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Where have I justified my stand on one man and one woman marriage with religion or creationism? Why don't you respond to the actual arguments instead of making up this creationism strawman?
Is it mental illness to see creationism in every critic?
It *is* his, but hey, at least now you can see why you're both just like each other!

(big grin)

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#3204 Oct 29, 2013
Claude wrote:
<quoted text>
He old big d!ck! How's that monster hanging today?
You started doing this when you were 12, now you are 15. Your whole "life" revolves around ME. You've seen less sunshine that Dracula, because you spend all of your time in the basement following following ME from forum to forum, using different proxy servers and names. You actually think that if I were a man, I'd consider being told I'm well hung are cutting insult. Must suck to be you. Call the teen suicide hotline, but ask them the best way to do it.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#3205 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>And it's not on my list either.
Here's a reason from religion, used by Senator Obama in 2008:
http://www.clipsandcomment.com/2008/08/17/ful...
WARREN: There’s a lot more I’d like to ask on that. We have 15 other questions here. Define marriage.
OBAMA: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian — for me — for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.
Here's then Senator Biden's argument for keeping marriage one man and one woman:
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/de...
IFILL: Let's try to avoid nuance, Senator. Do you support gay marriage?
BIDEN: No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be able to be able to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it.
You cupid stunt, Biden is now VP. And both Biden and Obama have matured and changed their minds.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#3206 Oct 29, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
You cupid stunt, Biden is now VP. And both Biden and Obama have matured and changed their minds.
How do you know, they won't change them back? What if the political winds change, like they did before they 'matured'?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#3207 Oct 29, 2013
I know Biden is Vice President, he was a Senator when he said:

"No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be able to be able to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it."

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#3208 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
I know Biden is Vice President, he was a Senator when he said:
"No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be able to be able to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it."
but biden is an idiot. are you now a biden fan and support everything he says?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#3209 Oct 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
I know Biden is Vice President, he was a Senator when he said:

"No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be able to be able to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it."
"In what government sources says was a quickly-arranged political strategy, Obama told ABC News, "At a certain point, I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married."

Perhaps bowing to political caution in an election year, the president added, "I had hesitated on gay marriage in part because I thought that civil unions would be sufficient. I was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people, the word marriage was something that invokes very powerful traditions and religious beliefs."

The message was reaffirmed in broad strokes at the January inaugural address: "Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law -- for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well."

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/25/politics/suprem...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 1 hr Frindly 3,205
hell is a real place. so.. ahtiesm is a faux li... 1 hr Eagle 12 - 15
High School Atheism 3 hr blacklagoon 3 39
what science will NEVER be able to prove 4 hr blacklagoon 3 61
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... (May '17) 8 hr Frindly 1,191
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 9 hr tongangodz 4,953
How Do You Debate? 12 hr blacklagoon 3 2
More from around the web