Evidenc of Jesus

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#21 Apr 27, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Mr. BakingSoda.
Atheism is the belief that no god exists.
Absence of belief would be agnosticism, verificationism, or not being mentally competent to form a conclusion.
None of those is atheism.
Atheism comes from the greek "atheos", meaning "no god".
Atheists hold the belief that there is no god.
You should learn what the position is before you join it.
Sad Straw Man!

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#22 Apr 27, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Mr. BakingSoda.
Atheism is the belief that no god exists.
Absence of belief would be agnosticism, verificationism, or not being mentally competent to form a conclusion.
None of those is atheism.
Atheism comes from the greek "atheos", meaning "no god".
Atheists hold the belief that there is no god.
You should learn what the position is before you join it.
Wrong, Mr. Upa Crick.

Atheism is a Conclusion, not a Belief.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#23 Apr 27, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Mr. BakingSoda.
Atheism is the belief that no god exists.
Absence of belief would be agnosticism, verificationism, or not being mentally competent to form a conclusion.
None of those is atheism.
Atheism comes from the greek "atheos", meaning "no god".
Atheists hold the belief that there is no god.
You should learn what the position is before you join it.
You should learn what you are talking about before you try to redefine it.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#24 Apr 27, 2013
MrDesoto1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Mr. Upa Crick.
Atheism is a Conclusion, not a Belief.
A conclusion IS a belief if it is not a verifiable fact.

Concerning the existence of a god, it is not verifiable.

That is, unless you are omniscient.

But if you are omniscient, you are a god, so gods exist.

You are wrong either way.

But thanks for the entertainment, Mr. BakingSoda.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#25 Apr 27, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
A conclusion IS a belief if it is not a verifiable fact.
Concerning the existence of a god, it is not verifiable.
That is, unless you are omniscient.
But if you are omniscient, you are a god, so gods exist.
You are wrong either way.
But thanks for the entertainment, Mr. BakingSoda.
Atheism is a lack of belief. That's all there is to it. I know it's difficult for lying theists to accept.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#26 Apr 27, 2013
MrDesoto1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism is a lack of belief. That's all there is to it. I know it's difficult for lying theists to accept.
No, atheism is a belief, no less than theism, Mr. BakingSoda.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

"Atheism means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#27 Apr 27, 2013
MrDesoto1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You should learn what you are talking about before you try to redefine it.
You have it backwards, Mr. BakingSoda.

The attempt to redefine atheism is to call it a lack of belief.

It can be traced, most recently, to Anthony Flew.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#28 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheism is a belief, no less than theism, Mr. BakingSoda.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
"Atheism means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."
You can't accept the fact that you don't have any proof of god and you are trying to redefine atheism according to your hallucination's terms.

Classic cognitive dissonance from the known creationist troll.

For everyone's information Buck Crick believes jesus rode on the backs of dinosaurs and that fossils are somehow "not real".

He's a full of sh*t remnant of 2005 creationism.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#29 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheism is a belief, no less than theism, Mr. BakingSoda.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
"Atheism means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."
Why do you godbots always think you can tell other people what they think?

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#30 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You have it backwards, Mr. BakingSoda.
The attempt to redefine atheism is to call it a lack of belief.
It can be traced, most recently, to Anthony Flew.
It's sad you godbots continue your lies. But it's what your religion teaches you .

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#31 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheism is a belief, no less than theism, Mr. BakingSoda.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
"Atheism means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."
Sad and sorry attempt at another Straw Man!

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#32 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheism is a belief, no less than theism, Mr. BakingSoda.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
"Atheism means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."
RationalWiki:

Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods. Indeed, the word stems from the Greek a- meaning "without", and theos meaning "god". Theos includes the Abrahamic YHWH(s), Zeus, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and every other deity from A to Z[2](and 0-9,!, ",#,$ or any other character, obviously). For the definition of atheism, the terms "God" and "a god" are used interchangeably as there is no difference between a monotheistic deity and a pantheon of polytheistic deities when it comes to complete disbelief in them. This also has the deliberate intent of ignoring the privileged position Yahweh has held in English grammar. Most atheists also do not believe in anything supernatural or paranormal.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#33 Apr 28, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>

You should learn what the position is before you join it.
You should not make ASSumptions, because that's making as ASS out out of yourself. But keep talking. Your true colors are emerging.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#34 Apr 28, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you godbots always think you can tell other people what they think?
He must think he is omniscient. That malady runs in his religion.

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

#35 Apr 28, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
He is just pointing out you are an idiot.
It's good to have a opinion.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#36 Apr 28, 2013
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
It's good to have a opinion.
You have yet to learn the difference between opinion and fact.

1. Opinions are what you have.
2. Facts are what you are, ie. You are an idiot.

See if you hang around here long enough you might learn something.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#37 Apr 28, 2013
Carchar king wrote:
IF the earth lived for billions of years, why is it only 2013. That proves Jesus is real. Because we use the timeline, since his birth and if he wasn't real, we would've never had a timeline.
It's only 2013, because collectively, the human race decided a uniform calendar would be an excellent idea.

And over time, country after country adopted the most common calendar then in use.

Of course? The Chinese did keep track of >>their<< calendar in parallel.

As did the Jews.

So the year 2013 is not universal across the world.

None of that has a thing to do with any god or other fairy tale.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#38 Apr 28, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
IF th arth livd for billions of yars, why is it only 2013. That provs Jsus is ral. Bcaus w us th timlin, sinc his birth and if he wasn't ral, w would'v nvr had a timlin.
LMAO! That is so funny, I snorted Iced Tea out my nose...

:D

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#39 Apr 28, 2013
Carchar king wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =z0DT6uljSbgXX&feature=pla yer_detailpage
I watched your silly film.

My head did not explode, and I'm still an atheist.

How about that?

Your god?

Is not convincing.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#40 Apr 28, 2013
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder why atheists say there is no God when there is possibility of one, can see you atheists are struggling to disprove my evidence.
There is no struggle-- for one? You haven't presented any evidence of any kind.

And for another?

Well.... I'll leave you guessing...

LMAO!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... (Jan '17) 43 min yehoshooah adam 4,328
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 58 min 15th Dalai Lama 77,084
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 3 hr brenda6 899
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 3 hr John 32,291
Atheists are subhuman filth that need to be exe... 16 hr Roec 1
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 18 hr superwilly 258,482
Religion sux ? Tue Eagle 12 - 4
More from around the web