You don't need to get involved. I thought that you were asking about what happened. Dim misrepresented Dawkins, was told several times,and repeated the lie several more times, and now seems to be denying that it happened.<quoted text>
Well I'm backing out of this because I do not wish to invest the time to find out if Dawkins said those words or not. I do see the article and that Mathias was the one that appeared to make those statements.
Then he fetches a criticism of somebody doing that with an apocryphal Jefferson quote. We had little choice but to review Dim's calumny and emphasize his subsequent hypocrisy and indifference. The point is that he couldn't care less how inaccurate his allegations are. He's agenda driven, and his agenda has no use for academic integrity.