Dude. Your link criticizes and debunks your bible. You didn't understand it, did you? You didn't even look at the name of the link. What do you think that "pseudosc" is short for?"Now the Hebrews were not an especially technological society; when Solomon built his Temple he had to hire Phoenecian artisans for the really technical work. So the author of this passage may not have known the exact value of pi, or thought his readers might not be aware that specifying the diameter of a circle automatically specifies its circumference. In any case, the essential point was the impressive size of the cauldron, and its dimensions were only approximate, because the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is stated to be EXACTLY 3! rather than the real value of pi which is 3.14159...."
What how could this be? The bible said to build it ratio of the circumference to the diameter to 3 and son of a gun it is 3 and not Pi.
Hmmm maybe God didn't want to use Pi?
If you understood your bible, you would reject it, just as had you understood your link, you wouldn't have cited it here. They were mocking you. You noted that the author wrote, "maybe God didn't want to use Pi" as if it were an arbitrary choice? Did you see the paragraph about the Iowa legislature trying to declare pi equal to three? Do you think that the author was admiring the Iowan legislature or mocking them? Similarly, do you think he was admiring your bible or mocking it?
Why does this keep happening to you and Dim Derek? Is it a coincidence that the two of you, who have difficulty comprehending the written word are Christians, and that the guy who realizes what a blunder you made even before he opens your link just by reading the URL has rejected what you have chosen to believe?
No, it's not.