Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity?

Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity?

There are 10043 comments on the Free Republic story from May 5, 2011, titled Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity?. In it, Free Republic reports that:

'RELIGION SHOULD BE TREATED WITH RIDICULE, HATRED AND CONTEMPT' Atheism, or 'antitheism,' which was once considered taboo in America, has gone somewhat mainstream in today's society.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Free Republic.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6011 Nov 7, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Which is why a ban on male masturbation must be enacted.
WTF?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6012 Nov 7, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"These well documented adverse side effects include...
http://www.pop.org/content/dangers-of-morning...
...death. There are several other links but I'm sure you "agendists"
will continue ignoring the facts in your ever increasing blood lust of the innocent. Facts have never played a part in your death cult.
A **Lying** for **Jesus** website cannot be trusted.

They are anti-everything (except forcing women to give birth).

Such an anti-life website cannot tell the truth if they were **paid** to.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6013 Nov 7, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Conception is when a "new" life begins, one with its own unique DNA signature that defines it as an entity who has no equal genetically.
Was it dead before? No? Then it's not "new" anything.

A **living** sperm unites with a **living** ova and you get a **still-living** zygote.

Which--if it's lucky-- 9 months later it might become a person.

Most are not-- 9 of 10 do not make it,**naturally** for various reasons--

-- the majority simply don't get to the "ova/sperm unite" part-- they pass like ships in the night, unfulfilled.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6014 Nov 7, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
It is not that the other sperm "must" die to allow the one to merge with the ova, but that they can only live for a limited amount of time in the female's body.
Bullshyt. bullshit-bullshit-bullshit.... your near-total ***ignorance** in this matter is ... disturbing.

Each sperm has a very minute bit of a very specific hormone.

Each sperm releases it's cargo of hormone into the ova's cell wall--gradually changing it.

Once the hormone is released, if that sperm cannot merge with the ova? It dies.

But the ova's membrane/cell wall need a **specific** quantity of this hormone before it opens to admit a sperm.

Not unlike putting individual straws onto a camel's back...

... but, the process is **very** specific. Once the correct quantity of hormone is given to the ova? The next sperm that gets there and releases it's cargo-- gets inside-- and triggers a different reaction in the cell wall-- which then blocks all subsequent sperm and the **hormone** too.

So you could not be more **wrong**-- millions of sperms **must** die--before the millionth and one gets a shot at getting in.

It's a very chaotic system-- as we would expect from the **evolution** process.

However-- it is the exact **opposite** of what you'd expect from a **god** designed system.

Proof-positive there is **no** god involved, here.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6015 Nov 7, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Why am I not surprised that one of you lunatics gave info from the World Health Organization bad judgicons?
I feel sorry for the mentally challenged who fall under your influence.
Your link was a Liar For Jewsus website.

What did you expect?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6016 Nov 7, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>It DOES begin at conception; geneticists know this whether you do, or not, and your denial has no bearing on the reality of what the facts reveal.
Nope.

You are a low-grade moron.

A **living** sperm unites with a **living** egg.

There is no "life begins" at **any** step in the process.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6017 Nov 7, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
After watching that video it's seems more likely they (the cultists) lit the fire themselves.
Of course they did-- classic GodBottery it was, too.

They are an excellent example of what happens when Faith is abused.

Which is why religious faith is so dangerous.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6018 Nov 7, 2013
virtuanna wrote:
<quoted text>When have I ever quoted bible text to defend the life of the unborn? I've been using scientific evidence that proves an individual's life begins at conception.
There is no such thing, doofus.

You are just another religious bigot-- you are **anti** everything.

Except you are pro-birth-- and **nothing** else.

Your sort is **against** prenatal care programs-- because that's a hand-out, right?

... meh.

“Don't get me started”

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#6019 Nov 8, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Bullshyt!
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/515...
Intimidation by poking holes in the building wasn't working so they took a break and came back and started a fire. The fire started just above the last intrusion that broke into the second story floor. Those people didn't hold out for 51 days just to set fire to themselves immediately upon that last intrusion.
That reporter should be ashamed of himself for lying during that coverage. He was kissing Clinton butt, period.
Alas nano, it’s worse than you think. The socialist plot is just the tip of the iceberg. On the surface it looks like Clinton and his ilk were just targeting peace loving, praying folks, who would never want to do any harm to our American Christian nation.

But as you look deeper into that plot you realize there is much more. The media will not tell you, so you have to see this with your gut instinct—as how most socialist plots are finally seen through.

The dirty truth is that the ultimate target of the socialist Clinton plot was and still remains against all raving mad paranoid schizophrenics. Regular folks are not mentally equipped to see through the plot, but when you think about it I’m sure you will agree.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#6020 Nov 8, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"
Just sayin'.
Its easy to make your cult look stupid, we just let you idiots type and it does the job.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#6021 Nov 8, 2013
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Alas nano, it’s worse than you think. The socialist plot is just the tip of the iceberg. On the surface it looks like Clinton and his ilk were just targeting peace loving, praying folks, who would never want to do any harm to our American Christian nation.
But as you look deeper into that plot you realize there is much more. The media will not tell you, so you have to see this with your gut instinct—as how most socialist plots are finally seen through.
The dirty truth is that the ultimate target of the socialist Clinton plot was and still remains against all raving mad paranoid schizophrenics. Regular folks are not mentally equipped to see through the plot, but when you think about it I’m sure you will agree.
Why don't you **PRAY** away all the "evil liberals"?

Hmmm?

I am quite certain it will be very effective.

**Exactly** as effective as all your prayers to put Mitt-the-Twitt in the White House.

And that turned out so well for you... right?

.... right?

<laughing my azz off at you idiots>

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#6022 Nov 8, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF?
I think "Lil Ticked" has snapped.

“Don't get me started”

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#6023 Nov 8, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you **PRAY** away all the "evil liberals"?
Hmmm?
I am quite certain it will be very effective.
**Exactly** as effective as all your prayers to put Mitt-the-Twitt in the White House.
And that turned out so well for you... right?
.... right?
<laughing my azz off at you idiots>
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Alas nano, it’s worse than you think. The socialist plot is just the tip of the iceberg. On the surface it looks like Clinton and his ilk were just targeting peace loving, praying folks, who would never want to do any harm to our American Christian nation.
But as you look deeper into that plot you realize there is much more. The media will not tell you, so you have to see this with your gut instinct—as how most socialist plots are finally seen through.
The dirty truth is that the ultimate target of the socialist Clinton plot was and still remains against all raving mad paranoid schizophrenics. Regular folks are not mentally equipped to see through the plot, but when you think about it I’m sure you will agree.

----------
Hi Bob,
Read it again.

Regards,
applePOE

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#6024 Nov 8, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Those people became criminals the instant they were told to "come out with their hands up" and refused to do so ... same as you or me. Don't matter if they were just praying, establishing a religion, abusing children or playing Tiddly Winks.
"Come out with your hands up".
Obey or die, huh?

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#6025 Nov 8, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF?
Sarcasm.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#6026 Nov 8, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Its easy to make your cult look stupid, we just let you idiots type and it does the job.
What ever trips your trigger. You are more "religious" than I ever was.
Dogmatic psychopath that claims everyone who doesn't agree with him belongs to a cult.
LCNLin

United States

#6027 Nov 8, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>What ever trips your trigger. You are more "religious" than I ever was.
Dogmatic psychopath that claims everyone who doesn't agree with him belongs to a cult.
She is fun.
Post anything she does not like
and you will get a reply .... OCD?
virtuanna

Texarkana, TX

#6028 Nov 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I think "Lil Ticked" has snapped.
I can count on one hand the number of sane, reasonable posters on Topix; Lil Ticked is among that number. You are not.
virtuanna

Texarkana, TX

#6029 Nov 8, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
You are as vaporous as I am dense. Of course a Human life is much more 'valuable' than an ape's ... or any other animal for that matter. Why? Not because of what we are ... but because of what we could be. Same as a fetus. NEVER presume that I do not value or recognize the gravity of what we are talking about here. BUT ... the right of a woman to be able to choose her own destiny is MORE important to me. The fact remains that in the first trimester, the fetus, for all of it's great 'potential' is basically a lump of tissue ... unformed, unthinking, unfeeling and unaware. Whereas the mother is all of those things. We (me, you or Uncle Sam) simply do not have the right to force our preferences upon her. Anti-abortionist 'pro-lifers' need to be on the free birth-control, sex education and planned parenthood bandwagon and leave individuals to their own decisions.
The morning after pill dosage is the equivalent of 50 of the commonly taken birth control pills. Try reading the Merck Manual that they insert into their birth control compact. The Pill users have a 40% chance of having a stroke, heart attack and increased risk of breast cancer. Would YOU take that crap just because you didn't want a baby? Would you feel comfortable taking 50x the dosage of any of your usual medications?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13100...

Love, hate and resentment are all choices too. It's just as easy to "decide" to love an unborn baby as it is to decide to hate it. What's it say about a woman who chooses to hate the innocent?

The education we should give kids should include not judging a woman for being single and pregnant. Fear of parental anger and judgement from peers plays too large a part in the resentment that many women feel for the baby in their belly.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#6030 Nov 8, 2013
virtuanna wrote:
<quoted text>The morning after pill dosage is the equivalent of 50 of the commonly taken birth control pills. Try reading the Merck Manual that they insert into their birth control compact. The Pill users have a 40% chance of having a stroke, heart attack and increased risk of breast cancer. Would YOU take that crap just because you didn't want a baby?
I took it, just because I didn't want a baby.

BTW, it's not true that pill users have a 40% chance of having a stroke. That's just pure bull.
virtuanna wrote:
Would you feel comfortable taking 50x the dosage of any of your usual medications?
Depends upon which one, for how long, and for what reason.
The morning after pill is not intended for every day use, and it's NOT 50x the dose of the regular pill. How far up your backside do you reach to get your info?
virtuanna wrote:
<
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13100...
Love, hate and resentment are all choices too. It's just as easy to "decide" to love an unborn baby as it is to decide to hate it. What's it say about a woman who chooses to hate the innocent?
The education we should give kids should include not judging a woman for being single and pregnant. Fear of parental anger and judgement from peers plays too large a part in the resentment that many women feel for the baby in their belly.
There is no "unborn baby", the morning after pill PREVENTS pregnancy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why I quit atheism 22 min Chazofsaints 680
News Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns (Sep '14) 2 hr Reason Personified 340
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 3 hr thetruth 3,821
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 3 hr thetruth 18,451
News Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris are old news - a t... 3 hr thetruth 55
News Athiest tells high schoolers God is evil (May '11) 3 hr thetruth 793
News Who is an atheist? (May '10) 4 hr thetruth 9,358
A Universe from Nothing? 4 hr thetruth 419
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 5 hr Chimney1 43,083
More from around the web