Atheism and cowardice

Atheism and cowardice

There are 12674 comments on the Conservapedia story from Nov 18, 2011, titled Atheism and cowardice. In it, Conservapedia reports that:

Have any of the New Atheists toured [[Islam]]ic countries giving lectures in which they condemn [[Allah]], [[Muhammad]], Islam, or Muslims? Have any of them debated Muslims in Islamic countries? Have any of them been interviewed on Al Jazeera? Have any of them written entire books in which they condemn Allah, Muhammad, Islam, or Muslims? Have they ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Conservapedia.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12550 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
no, we love to dissect whining bullies
So you are into self-mutilation, now?

Wow... I knew you are deranged, but I had no idea...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12551 Nov 13, 2013
Proof of evolution: http://www.talkorigins.org/

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12552 Nov 13, 2013

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12553 Nov 13, 2013

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12554 Nov 13, 2013

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12556 Nov 13, 2013

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12557 Nov 13, 2013

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12559 Nov 13, 2013
Bob, would you Evolution be that of Darwin's or Jay Gould's? Or the way that Francis Collins believe?

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#12560 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
Bob, would you Evolution be that of Darwin's or Jay Gould's? Or the way that Francis Collins believe?
Your question scares me, but not in the way you might expect.

The current theory of biological evolution takes something from a number of earlier biological researchers. As always in science, we keep the things that can be independently verified (only for as long as these things continue to hold up to such verifications). And we attempt to build on these testable hypotheses to improve our understanding.

Your question denotes a general lack of even a basic understanding of science, scientific methods, scientific theories, etc.

Were you by chance home schooled???

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12561 Nov 13, 2013
Hedonist wrote:
Your question scares me, but not in the way you might expect.
The current theory of biological evolution takes something from a number of earlier biological researchers. As always in science, we keep the things that can be independently verified (only for as long as these things continue to hold up to such verifications). And we attempt to build on these testable hypotheses to improve our understanding.
Your question denotes a general lack of even a basic understanding of science, scientific methods, scientific theories, etc.
Were you by chance home schooled???
All 3 thoughts are currently held, Bob's sock. But don't duck the question, Bob, and since you realize that science builds on earlier developments, you must know at how to answer the question comparing Darwin's gradualism and Gould's punctuated equilibrium - they are in their nature "irreconcilable" (unless you don't even know the difference). I'll leave Francis Collin's view out, because you couldn't bare to hear what he said...(but he actually asserted that Darwin was "right" in his lectures - only he believes God is behind all this)
LCNLin

United States

#12562 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
Bob, would you Evolution be that of Darwin's or Jay Gould's? Or the way that Francis Collins believe?
Social Darwinism is a favorite of the rich.
"s^eptic" does mention scatology a great deal, if you read the OCD posts. Maybe septic is closer?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12563 Nov 13, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
Social Darwinism is a favorite of the rich.
"s^eptic" does mention scatology a great deal, if you read the OCD posts. Maybe septic is closer?
I don't know, but notice that they all hide their ISP for some reason, and they pop up at the right moment to answer for the ones hiding behind. They all spew the same hatred that I don't see atheists in Islam Forum (where I enter from) do. You just don't naturally see so many of those marvelous popcorns popping up in the same thread.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12564 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
All 3 thoughts are currently held, Bob's sock.
I have always and ever only posted under this one.

But.

It is quite obvious, by your "reply"-- that you hold and post many-many different ID's.

This post of yours? A dead giveaway.

Such a hypocrite you are.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12565 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
Bob, would you Evolution be that of Darwin's or Jay Gould's? Or the way that Francis Collins believe?
None of the above.

I'm so very sorry to witness your near-total loss of sanity, as your "question" demonstrates, above.

Sad, really.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12566 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
I don't know, but notice that they all hide their ISP for some reason, and they pop up at the right moment to answer for the ones hiding behind. They all spew the same hatred that I don't see atheists in Islam Forum (where I enter from) do. You just don't naturally see so many of those marvelous popcorns popping up in the same thread.
And then they decorate each other with christmas lightings and never forget to shower us with nuts. I'm afraid you're right, LCN, about their OCD behavior.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12567 Nov 13, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
I have always and ever only posted under this one.
But.
It is quite obvious, by your "reply"-- that you hold and post many-many different ID's.
Lol! logical deduction, huh?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12568 Nov 13, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
None of the above.
I'm so very sorry to witness your near-total loss of sanity, as your "question" demonstrates, above.
Sad, really.
Ok, I'm not as bright as you are, wasn't that why I tried to pick your brain on that? So, what would your evolution tree/trees look like that is "none of the above"?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#12569 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know, but notice that they all hide their ISP for some reason, and they pop up at the right moment to answer for the ones hiding behind. They all spew the same hatred that I don't see atheists in Islam Forum (where I enter from) do. You just don't naturally see so many of those marvelous popcorns popping up in the same thread.
i detect fathwa envy

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#12570 Nov 13, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
All 3 thoughts are currently held, Bob's sock. But don't duck the question, Bob, and since you realize that science builds on earlier developments, you must know at how to answer the question comparing Darwin's gradualism and Gould's punctuated equilibrium - they are in their nature "irreconcilable" (unless you don't even know the difference). I'll leave Francis Collin's view out, because you couldn't bare to hear what he said...(but he actually asserted that Darwin was "right" in his lectures - only he believes God is behind all this)
So this is how you respond to someone the first time they try to converse with you ... cheap shots.

I've been off of Topix for a while (about a year or a little more) exactly because of people like you who add nothing to any conversation and apparently are only interested in eliciting emotional responses from people.

This is a thread on atheism. Why don't you try actually discussing the subject of the thread, maybe you could even try to learn a little something about the people who consider themselves atheists, agnostics, humanists, etc.

If you really want to discuss biological evolution, the Evolution forum is at " http://www.topix.com/news/evolution" ;. Atheistic thought does NOT depend on our modern understanding of biological evolution. Atheism has existed since long before evolutionary science existed.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12571 Nov 13, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
i detect fathwa envy
time to check your circuit.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 8 min Samuel Patre 94,331
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 51 min Eagle 12 - 5,987
News Geoff Robson is wrong about Richard Dawkins, th... 1 hr Prince of Darkness 3
News Christ, Atheism, Quantum Physics, and the Natur... 1 hr nanoanomaly 1
a prayer of salvation for those who are willing (Oct '17) Wed Eagle 12 - 142
News Egyptian Parliament considers outlawing atheism May 21 Guest 6
Stephen Hawking, now a believer May 8 superwilly 20