Atheism and cowardice

Atheism and cowardice

There are 12665 comments on the Conservapedia story from Nov 18, 2011, titled Atheism and cowardice. In it, Conservapedia reports that:

Have any of the New Atheists toured [[Islam]]ic countries giving lectures in which they condemn [[Allah]], [[Muhammad]], Islam, or Muslims? Have any of them debated Muslims in Islamic countries? Have any of them been interviewed on Al Jazeera? Have any of them written entire books in which they condemn Allah, Muhammad, Islam, or Muslims? Have they ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Conservapedia.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10706 Jul 31, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
But your statement about Genuine Christians being hate-cult is as flawed as claiming that if someone believes human will die then that someone must belong to a hate-cult.
To qualify someone as hateful, you better prove that it is their "wish", rather than their mere belief that others would go to hell, but it has never been Christians wish that others would go to hell (or why bother trying to convert people?)
And, by the same argument you used to judge christians as "hate-cult", couldn't you also have concluded that christians belong to "Love-Cult" because by the other side of the coin that they believe and wish that people would go to heaven? But that argument too would be as fallacious, because mere "belief" of something doesn't tell what the person wants.
Who are your "Genuine Christians", define them? How are they more hateful than atheists in general?
As usual, theists love to play victim, all the while never bothering to correct the statement that atheists are fools in their books.

Dishonest people who us peoples emotions to evoke pity, when all the while they are ruthless haters who judge atheists they've never met.

You can't fool us any longer liars. The game is up.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10707 Jul 31, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
But your statement about Genuine Christians being hate-cult is as flawed as claiming that if someone believes human will die then that someone must belong to a hate-cult.
To qualify someone as hateful, you better prove that it is their "wish", rather than their mere belief that others would go to hell, but it has never been Christians wish that others would go to hell (or why bother trying to convert people?)
And, by the same argument you used to judge christians as "hate-cult", couldn't you also have concluded that christians belong to "Love-Cult" because by the other side of the coin that they believe and wish that people would go to heaven? But that argument too would be as fallacious, because mere "belief" of something doesn't tell what the person wants.
Who are your "Genuine Christians", define them? How are they more hateful than atheists in general?
Your opinions are worthless until you've proven the god you're here to lie to us about.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10708 Jul 31, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>Well, according to that old coot ..If you like "anything" you worship it ..So, just I assume you worship penis ..
Cry, lie and whine - do anything except prove the god you're here to lie to us about...weak person.
LCN Llin

United States

#10709 Jul 31, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Your opinions are worthless until you've proven the god you're here to lie to us about.
Your stupidity lies in asking the world to believe along without, widening the net of your mental illness beyond yourself and infecting innocent others.- skeptic -

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10710 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
Your stupidity lies in asking the world to believe along without, widening the net of your mental illness beyond yourself and infecting innocent others.- skeptic -
Your mental illness is not our concern. If you believe god is real, you must either prove it or f*ck off back to your cult.

Its that simple for most, but your mental illness prevents you from accepting this basic fact.
LCN Llin

United States

#10711 Jul 31, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..WoW..Can you believe those constant lies and shyt..."Bob of Quantum-Faith" keeps posting ..wadda chup..!
And, wow and he claims he is not brimming with murderous anger ..but, he posts "5" posts to my "1" post ...he scares me .
he is, for sure ;the definition of "projection" ..
Agree
skeptic seems a creationist troll bent on embarrassing atheists.
Profanity seems his watchword.

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10712 Jul 31, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
As usual, theists love to play victim, all the while never bothering to correct the statement that atheists are fools in their books.
Dishonest people who us peoples emotions to evoke pity, when all the while they are ruthless haters who judge atheists they've never met.
You can't fool us any longer liars. The game is up.
I "play victim" in which post? I showed "dishonesty" in which sentence? I "ruthlessly hate" atheists in which revelation?
-Skeptic- wrote:
Your opinions are worthless until you've proven the god you're here to lie to us about.
Have you read my posts to Quantum Bob, do you really know my position enough? If you are speaking on behalf of Quantum Bob, answer to the points of mys respond instead of cheap accusations. My initial post to Quantum Bob was just a friendly FYI post to clear up the thread-entry point assumption. If doing that would cause some atheists to respond in such hateful way, then you have only prove that some atheists are worse than other atheists, and I have always been in nice conversation with other atheists here (in Islam forum).

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10713 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
skeptic seems a creationist troll bent on embarrassing atheists.
Profanity seems his watchword.
Really? lol!
Thinking

Royston, UK

#10714 Jul 31, 2013
There are a lot of theists that can't handle swearing.

I for one am more concerned by church abuse of children by priests who frown on swearing.
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? lol!

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10715 Jul 31, 2013
Thinking wrote:
There are a lot of theists that can't handle swearing.
I for one am more concerned by church abuse of children by priests who frown on swearing.
"swearing" isn't a christian thing, and I have no idea what catholics do about "swearing".

are christians not at least as concerned about children as other groups of human beings? we are probably more so as much of the money we donate for the cause of children.
LCN Llin

United States

#10716 Jul 31, 2013
Thinking wrote:
There are a lot of theists that can't handle swearing.
I for one am more concerned by church abuse of children by priests who frown on swearing.
<quoted text>
swearing is amusing.
-Skeptic- is fooling you guys?
A creationists trying to make atheists look bad?

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10717 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
swearing is amusing.
-Skeptic- is fooling you guys?
A creationists trying to make atheists look bad?
I'm a little confused by what is going on in this thread...
Maybe I'm in the wrong thread.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#10718 Jul 31, 2013
Religious indoctrination is child abuse.

Don't inflict religion on a child before they're legally allowed to drink.
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
"swearing" isn't a christian thing, and I have no idea what catholics do about "swearing".
are christians not at least as concerned about children as other groups of human beings? we are probably more so as much of the money we donate for the cause of children.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#10719 Jul 31, 2013
It can be.

LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
swearing is amusing.

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10720 Jul 31, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Religious indoctrination is child abuse.
Don't inflict religion on a child before they're legally allowed to drink.
Are you then sure imposition of atheistic worldview to your kids is not a form of "abusive" indoctrination?

No, denying your children from what one know positively affects oneself is a form of child abuse. Parents naturally go with what they believe is best for their childre, and no one would call you an abuser for denying your children a theistic worldview that has proven to help kids in positive ways. It would be child abuse for parents to go to their churches while leaving the kids behind. It would be child-abuse for parents to live one way while trying to hide it from the children. On simply have to live honorably and honestly, and nothing is preventing the kids from thinking for themselves when they grow up.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#10721 Jul 31, 2013
Well, since most people on the planet don't believe in your god, why not have a christian child, a buddhist child and a hindu child instead of all three the same religion?
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you then sure imposition of atheistic worldview to your kids is not a form of "abusive" indoctrination?
No, denying your children from what one know positively affects oneself is a form of child abuse. Parents naturally go with what they believe is best for their childre, and no one would call you an abuser for denying your children a theistic worldview that has proven to help kids in positive ways. It would be child abuse for parents to go to their churches while leaving the kids behind. It would be child-abuse for parents to live one way while trying to hide it from the children. On simply have to live honorably and honestly, and nothing is preventing the kids from thinking for themselves when they grow up.

Since: Apr 12

San Francisco, CA

#10722 Jul 31, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Well, since most people on the planet don't believe in your god, why not have a christian child, a buddhist child and a hindu child instead of all three the same religion?
So, are you responding to my post or are you still talking to yourself? I have no idea what your point is here.
LCN Llin

United States

#10723 Jul 31, 2013
Thinking wrote:
It can be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jdkN57xvekIXX
<quoted text>
OK had to look this up.:-)
Enjoyed your post and watched another episode on youtube

"Father Ted is an Irish sitcom that was produced by Hat Trick Productions for British broadcaster Channel 4. An Irish-British co-production, written jointly by Irish writers Arthur Mathews and Graham Linehan and starring a predominantly Irish cast, it originally aired over three series from 21 April 1995 until 1 May 1998, including a Christmas special, for a total of 25 episodes."
LCN Llin

United States

#10724 Jul 31, 2013
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a little confused by what is going on in this thread...
Maybe I'm in the wrong thread.
Life is very confusing and then we die!
The United Kingdom has given us the BBC to atone for our various sins, of maybe not.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10725 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree
skeptic seems a creationist troll bent on embarrassing atheists.
Profanity seems his watchword.
All you can play is hopeless games because you know you're a creationist troll liar with no proof of god and nobody takes your stupid cult seriously.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 5 min Rosa_Winkel 255,901
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 32 min Chimney1 40,228
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 45 min Rosa_Winkel 15,747
A Universe from Nothing? 1 hr IB DaMann 23
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 6 hr Abe 20,578
For Atheists: Why do You Call Theories "Scient... 7 hr IB DaMann 180
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 15 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 4,624
More from around the web