Atheism and cowardice

Atheism and cowardice

There are 12674 comments on the Conservapedia story from Nov 18, 2011, titled Atheism and cowardice. In it, Conservapedia reports that:

Have any of the New Atheists toured [[Islam]]ic countries giving lectures in which they condemn [[Allah]], [[Muhammad]], Islam, or Muslims? Have any of them debated Muslims in Islamic countries? Have any of them been interviewed on Al Jazeera? Have any of them written entire books in which they condemn Allah, Muhammad, Islam, or Muslims? Have they ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Conservapedia.

An Atheist

Ashburn, VA

#9909 Jun 23, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
They also stand up to muslims.
Atheist is not someone who doesn't believe in the existance of god but the person who wants to know the nature of reality. True measurements and evidence change his thoughts not a holy book.
This is why he believes more in science rather than conventional system.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#9910 Jun 23, 2013
An Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>Atheist is not someone who doesn't believe in the existance of god but the person who wants to know the nature of reality. True measurements and evidence change his thoughts not a holy book.
This is why he believes more in science rather than conventional system.
Its a definitely lack of belief.

You make the mistake of calling science a system. Its the only way of understanding physical reality.

The conventional system is guessing, and then lying about it more, to cover up the original lie.
Thinking

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#9911 Jun 23, 2013
Why? You're not of much interest to me.
number four wrote:
<quoted text>...I was trying to poke "thinking" in the eye ..
Thinking

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#9912 Jun 23, 2013
muslims try the same tactic as you. "Why don't you ever pick on christianity?"

I distrust all religions.
Seeker wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!!
Check out Sweden, here's some actually educated Muslims going to a fine University at Sweden's nickel. So no excuse that it is merely a lack of education. Go figure, eh? This is worth the while. You think Christian fundies are bad?? HAH!!! Just keep putting them down, and let the latest and greatest move on in so you can use them to knock the Christian fundies down. And the ironic part is that the people who willingly open the door for the Trojan Horse and help it get to the center of town, will be the ones who will be treated the worst when it gets there. People who already have belief in God will be treated better. Better study this religion more than even Christianity. As Churchill said about Chamberlain, the appeaser is the one who feeds the crocodile in hopes that it will eat him last, but in this case, the appeaser might even be eaten first. As they say, keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lQQAWrIvBoIXX
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Thinking

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#9913 Jun 23, 2013
Like many islamists, you seem very sexually frustrated.
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you got lucky.
Is it natural like those 'tornados' that you like to play with?
Sounds like you should be a porn star, maybe you and ChristineM could make a (re)production company with Thinking being the camera man.
You go grrrrl!
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9914 Jun 23, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Why? You're not of much interest to me.
<quoted text>
I've read your invasion of Iraq theory ..I believe that attacking Saddam has more to do with terrorism than oil trading in euros ..

Every terrorist attack that happens in Iraq ,is one less 'we' have to worry about ...President Bush ,had it right fight them on their shores or fight them on ours ..
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9915 Jun 23, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not always sexless actually. There are several creatures that attempt sexual acts even though they are the same sex.
..in the animal kingdom ...there is 'no' cunnilingus ,fellatio or sodamy ...there are animals which seem to prefer the same sex , and alpha males may mount other males as a show of dominance ..
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9916 Jun 23, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
But your jesus was **never** called that, during his alleged lifetime...
... that re-branding only came centuries later...
Fail.
..Emmanuel comes from the Gospel of Matthew ,written ..80 or 90 A.D ....

a century is 100 years , just a fun fact ,for your consumption .
Seeker

Lowell, MA

#9921 Jun 23, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>I've read your invasion of Iraq theory ..I believe that attacking Saddam has more to do with terrorism than oil trading in euros ..
The question to ask is why some European countries who traded in Euros participated in Iraq? So I doubt it had to do with Saddam planning to trade in Euros. These are just theories that anti war people invent. There are all sorts of theories like this. The first thing I remember anti war people stating was that the US was doing this to steal oil. Well, how are they supposed to do that when it gets sold on OPEC? Were they supposed to build secret tunnels to steal it and nobody was supposed to know? And now, of course, look at the end result. No stolen oil at all, no secret tunnels, and a major deficit for the US. Sometimes these theories are emotional and irrational. Saddam himself didn't set the price for his oil, OPEC and market forces did. Prices are always determined by supply and demand just like most other things naturally are. When people get emotional about something, all sorts of irrational theories are created.
Seeker

Lowell, MA

#9922 Jun 23, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
If you didn't believe in God, if you had no fear of our God, if you were truly an "atheist" , if you truly were a free thinker,.....you would NOT be on this forum fighting against Christians. You would be out and about trying to live a happy life.
Interesting. If I were an Atheist, I would probably just laugh at Theists. But I think people have shoved Theism in his face a lot in negative ways and he can't say what he really feels and how much he hates it in real life because, depending upon where he lives, he might be outnumbered and hated if he did so. So he comes on a forum where he can speak how he really feels with no retribution for saying things that the majority of people surrounding him might hate him for, and therefore do things to him..

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#9923 Jun 23, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..in the animal kingdom ...there is 'no' cunnilingus ,fellatio or sodamy ...there are animals which seem to prefer the same sex , and alpha males may mount other males as a show of dominance ..
You've never studied nature and dont realise that its all part of it. Your mental illness of faith prevents you from accepting natural reality as it is.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#9924 Jun 23, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
Only with Satanism. Atheism is a denomination of Satanism, whereby the 'group' is unaware that they've been duped.
Atheism is a lack of belief in god. No matter how much you lie, whine and squeal you cannot change its definition.

When you're brave enough to prove your god, your worthless opinions may matter.

It just shows how cowardly you creationists are - you simply cannot accept reality and mus try to make it fit your personal hallucination.

Satan is supposedly a god, right? Atheists dont believe in gods.

Its funny how stupid you creationists are.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#9925 Jun 23, 2013
Seeker wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting. If I were an Atheist, I would probably just laugh at Theists. But I think people have shoved Theism in his face a lot in negative ways and he can't say what he really feels and how much he hates it in real life because, depending upon where he lives, he might be outnumbered and hated if he did so. So he comes on a forum where he can speak how he really feels with no retribution for saying things that the majority of people surrounding him might hate him for, and therefore do things to him..
Again, you try to minimalise theism. It clearly states in the bible that all atheists are fools.

So we must accept that one christian value is judging people that they've never met before.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#9926 Jun 23, 2013
Every religion suffers from these stupidities and judgements against people that don't follow their mental illness.

Religious people are only nice because they want to convert you to their cults. They judge you in secret and are two faced liars.
LNC Llin

United States

#9927 Jun 23, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Every religion suffers from these stupidities and judgements against people that don't follow their mental illness.
Religious people are only nice because they want to convert you to their cults. They judge you in secret and are two faced liars.
Everyone who does not agree with "the clone" is a member of a "cult"
LOL
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9928 Jun 23, 2013
Seeker wrote:
<quoted text>
The question to ask is why some European countries who traded in Euros participated in Iraq? So I doubt it had to do with Saddam planning to trade in Euros. These are just theories that anti war people invent. There are all sorts of theories like this. The first thing I remember anti war people stating was that the US was doing this to steal oil. Well, how are they supposed to do that when it gets sold on OPEC? Were they supposed to build secret tunnels to steal it and nobody was supposed to know? And now, of course, look at the end result. No stolen oil at all, no secret tunnels, and a major deficit for the US. Sometimes these theories are emotional and irrational. Saddam himself didn't set the price for his oil, OPEC and market forces did. Prices are always determined by supply and demand just like most other things naturally are. When people get emotional about something, all sorts of irrational theories are created.
..thank-you ..no one could have said this better..

ha-ha.."Thinker" ..you limey ..you can sit on it ..!
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9930 Jun 23, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
You've never studied nature and dont realise that its all part of it. Your mental illness of faith prevents you from accepting natural reality as it is.
..NO , I never studied nature ..I'm not some f**king mountain man ..!!

But , I found out I was wrong ..okay , you happy ..?

Dear : "I_see_you".."B ob of Quantum-Faith"..and "dickless" ..

Anal sex occurs in the animal kingdom ...
Seeker

Lowell, MA

#9931 Jun 23, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..thank-you ..no one could have said this better..
ha-ha.."Thinker" ..you limey ..you can sit on it ..!
Believe it or not, truth can sometimes be more simple than fiction. I think that Bush was a kind of Texas sort of guy and after 911, he and others underneath him pretty much said, enough is enough, it's a different world now. And I think he had intentions of going after Iran or North Korea as well, or at minimum, chose Saddam to set an example and send a message for the other two, to show them that they could be next if they don't change the things they are doing. He even gave a speech beforehand labeling the three as an axis of evil.

Saddam was the guy always running around calling the US a paper tiger, and made Iraq out to be invincible. So if Bush showed he could pull that off in a matter of weeks, the other two might start to rethink their behavior. Even Tony Blair himself said in an interview that after 911, the world changed and the thinking changed and they could no longer let these countries carry on the way they do. Also, is the little known fact that the war against Iraq was not illegal in the least, and I wonder why nobody ever mentioned the following fact. There never was any treaty signed between the US and Iraq, there was only a ceasefire, and the ceasefire was based on unfettered weapons inspections. And Saddam continually played games with these and eventually even kicked the inspectors out in 1998, thumbing his nose at the US and basically daring them to do anything about it.

This was a breach of the ceasefire and the US could have and should have gone in right then and there. But big nose Clinton was too lazy getting BJs and sticking to comfortable status quo, which probably infuriated the more hawkish people. But, after 911, enough was enough and it created the right environment of fear for Bush to do what probably should have been done in 1998. He couldn't have sold it in 1998, but he could after 911. There was no second war against Iraq, it was merely the continuation of the first war after the ceasefire was breached.

This wasn't about oil at all, or Euros, it was about what they thought was the stabilization of the Middle East, with Saddam being the worst offender and destabilizer. I don't think that Bush did it the right way and botched it, but I think this was actually what he had in mind.
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#9932 Jun 23, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
You've never studied nature and dont realise that its all part of it. Your mental illness of faith prevents you from accepting natural reality as it is.
...Don't you think putting a 'spam'..'nuts'..and..'disagree '..on "every single" post , means 'you' might have the mental illness ..

what kind of person does that ....hmmm???
Thinking

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#9933 Jun 23, 2013
I don't claim the Euro as the only reason... some factoids for you:

Trading oil in Euros seriously hurts the US dollar and America's ability to run up debts sustainably.

Removing a diminished Saddam Hussein did Iran a big favour.

GWB said god told him to invade Iraq.

Venezuela is not a promoter of world terrorism but the West's supposed ally Saudi Arabia is.
Seeker wrote:
<quoted text>
The question to ask is why some European countries who traded in Euros participated in Iraq? So I doubt it had to do with Saddam planning to trade in Euros. These are just theories that anti war people invent. There are all sorts of theories like this. The first thing I remember anti war people stating was that the US was doing this to steal oil. Well, how are they supposed to do that when it gets sold on OPEC? Were they supposed to build secret tunnels to steal it and nobody was supposed to know? And now, of course, look at the end result. No stolen oil at all, no secret tunnels, and a major deficit for the US. Sometimes these theories are emotional and irrational. Saddam himself didn't set the price for his oil, OPEC and market forces did. Prices are always determined by supply and demand just like most other things naturally are. When people get emotional about something, all sorts of irrational theories are created.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 22 min Fudge 3,353
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr Simon 84,040
News BILL-BORED: Get Ready For Atheists' Annual Use ... Fri Eagle 12 - 9
News Scientist Richard Dawkins weighs in on Malaysia... Thu Eagle 12 - 6
High School Atheism Thu blacklagoon 3 41
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Wed Eagle 12 - 4,965
Where have all the Atheists gone? (Apr '17) Wed Eagle 12 - 132
More from around the web