“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5343 Jul 19, 2013
Educated What wrote:
<quoted text>
He said all so what you post deals with all. Lol!
His wife is evidently not a fundie. That was the point. Sorry you didn't get it.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5344 Jul 19, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. Nobody here goes by that name.
I don't know why she does this. She MUST know that it's just hate and anger from her lack of understanding of the Bible and our constant reminders to her of what it actually says. People get confused when you actually tell them what their holy book says.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5345 Jul 19, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure why Educated What is trying to create more atheists?
Nor do I. I didn't think it was part of the agenda.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5346 Jul 19, 2013
Educated What wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have an unhealthy fascination with kids. Seek help.
Still no proof of your accusations. Anyone can google something and say it's who they're talking about. It's not proof. You are still ill equipped to do anything but be a nasty person. That's because you really don't understand your Bible and therefore do not wish to discuss it or answer questions posed to you about it.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5347 Jul 19, 2013
Educated What wrote:
<quoted text>
Who said I'm for it? I don't abuse any kids or hurt them. But apparently you have some type of infatuation with this.
You're the one who keeps mentioning it. I would think projection would be a good call for your continued fascination with the subject.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#5348 Jul 19, 2013
Educated What wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm serious too. I'm reporting some people. This includes you.
This seems to be your tactic when you have totally lost a conversation. After all the accusations you have made, you're going to report someone? Now that is the talk of the truly beaten person.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#5349 Jul 19, 2013
water_nymph wrote:
<quoted text> This seems to be your tactic when you have totally lost a conversation. After all the accusations you have made, you're going to report someone? Now that is the talk of the truly beaten person.
Indeed. EW lacks the stones to actually **do** anything so proactive as reporting someone.

I suspect he simply says whatever he thinks will garner a reply-- whatever that may be.

If you ignore him? He starts to get **really** nasty--in a desperate bid for the return of your attention.

It's pretty pathetic, really.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#5350 Jul 19, 2013
Exactly. You get more Lols just ignoring and flushing that turd.
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Indeed. EW lacks the stones to actually **do** anything so proactive as reporting someone.

I suspect he simply says whatever he thinks will garner a reply-- whatever that may be.

If you ignore him? He starts to get **really** nasty--in a desperate bid for the return of your attention.

It's pretty pathetic, really.
LCN Llin

United States

#5351 Jul 30, 2013
Jane Austen to Replace Darwin on the Ten-Pound Note

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#5352 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
Jane Austen to Replace Darwin on the Ten-Pound Note
More stupid creationist sh*t from the failed bitter lincoln troll.
LCN Llin

United States

#5353 Jul 31, 2013
Educated What wrote:
<quoted text>
BwahahahHaha
-Skeptic- a creationist trying to embarrass atheists with moronic posts?...seems to fit the bill, profanity is watchword

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#5354 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
-Skeptic- a creationist trying to embarrass atheists with moronic posts?...seems to fit the bill, profanity is watchword
Better to stop talking when you've been caught lying about god Lincoln.

Your only embarrassing yourself.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#5355 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
-Skeptic- a creationist trying to embarrass atheists with moronic posts?...seems to fit the bill, profanity is watchword
I can and do play this game all day.

You are just a one tiny creationist in a sea of trolls that have never come back. You will f*ck off one day just like all before you.
LCN Llin

United States

#5356 Jul 31, 2013
BBC

The Queen was expected to urge the people of the United Kingdom to "pray" in the event of a nuclear war, government documents from 1983 reveal.

The script for a hypothetical broadcast has the monarch describing the threat to the "brave country" as "greater" than any other in history.

It also mentions the Queen's son Prince Andrew, then in the Royal Navy.

Devised by Whitehall officials at one of the most fraught periods of the Cold War, it was never recorded.

The document, released by the government under the 30-year rule, was drawn up as part of a war-gaming exercise in the spring of 1983, working through potential scenarios.
'Terrors'

Although it was only a simulation, the text of the Queen's address - written as if broadcast at midday on Friday 4 March 1983 - seeks to prepare the country for the ordeal of World War III.

The script reads: "Now this madness of war is once more spreading through the world and our brave country must again prepare itself to survive against great odds.
Prince Andrew The speech includes a reference to Prince Andrew, then serving in the Royal Navy

"I have never forgotten the sorrow and the pride I felt as my sister and I huddled around the nursery wireless set listening to my father's [George VI's] inspiring words on that fateful day in 1939 [at the start of the World War II].

"Not for a single moment did I imagine that this solemn and awful duty would one day fall to me.

"But whatever terrors lie in wait for us all, the qualities that have helped to keep our freedom intact twice already during this sad century will once more be our strength."

Striking a personal note, the script continues: "My husband and I share with families up and down the land the fear we feel for sons and daughters, husbands and brothers who have left our side to serve their country.

"My beloved son Andrew is at this moment in action with his unit and we pray continually for his safety and for the safety of all servicemen and women at home and overseas.

"It is this close bond of family life that must be our greatest defence against the unknown.

"If families remain united and resolute, giving shelter to those living alone and unprotected, our country's will to survive cannot be broken."

In the war-gaming exercise, Orange bloc forces - representing the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies - launch a chemical weapon attack on the UK.

Blue forces - representing Nato - retaliate with a "limited-yield" nuclear strike, forcing Orange to sue for peace.

The exercise came in the year that US President Ronald Reagan both enraged and alarmed Moscow with his denunciation of the Soviet Union as the "evil empire", his plans for a "Star Wars" ballistic missile shield in space, and the deployment of US nuclear cruise missiles to Europe - including to RAF Greenham Common.

Tensions increased when the Soviets shot down a South Korean airliner that strayed into their airspace, killing all 269 on board.

A Nato military exercise, codenamed Able Archer, then nearly triggered an actual conflict with the Soviet leadership apparently convinced it was cover for a genuine attack.

The Soviet Union and the US later negotiated a reduction in the number of nuclear weapons, as the Cold War came to an end.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#5357 Jul 31, 2013
Just flush that turd, he doesn't even have a basic understanding of English so he is unable to even begin to comprehend what you are saying. Let him go pray in church for some English lessons lol!
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>I can and do play this game all day.

You are just a one tiny creationist in a sea of trolls that have never come back. You will f*ck off one day just like all before you.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#5358 Jul 31, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
BBC
The Queen was expected to urge the people of the United Kingdom to "pray" in the event of a nuclear war, government documents from 1983 reveal.
The script for a hypothetical broadcast has the monarch describing the threat to the "brave country" as "greater" than any other in history.
It also mentions the Queen's son Prince Andrew, then in the Royal Navy.
Devised by Whitehall officials at one of the most fraught periods of the Cold War, it was never recorded.
The document, released by the government under the 30-year rule, was drawn up as part of a war-gaming exercise in the spring of 1983, working through potential scenarios.
'Terrors'
Although it was only a simulation, the text of the Queen's address - written as if broadcast at midday on Friday 4 March 1983 - seeks to prepare the country for the ordeal of World War III.
The script reads: "Now this madness of war is once more spreading through the world and our brave country must again prepare itself to survive against great odds.
Prince Andrew The speech includes a reference to Prince Andrew, then serving in the Royal Navy
"I have never forgotten the sorrow and the pride I felt as my sister and I huddled around the nursery wireless set listening to my father's [George VI's] inspiring words on that fateful day in 1939 [at the start of the World War II].
"Not for a single moment did I imagine that this solemn and awful duty would one day fall to me.
"But whatever terrors lie in wait for us all, the qualities that have helped to keep our freedom intact twice already during this sad century will once more be our strength."
Striking a personal note, the script continues: "My husband and I share with families up and down the land the fear we feel for sons and daughters, husbands and brothers who have left our side to serve their country.
"My beloved son Andrew is at this moment in action with his unit and we pray continually for his safety and for the safety of all servicemen and women at home and overseas.
"It is this close bond of family life that must be our greatest defence against the unknown.
"If families remain united and resolute, giving shelter to those living alone and unprotected, our country's will to survive cannot be broken."
In the war-gaming exercise, Orange bloc forces - representing the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies - launch a chemical weapon attack on the UK.
Blue forces - representing Nato - retaliate with a "limited-yield" nuclear strike, forcing Orange to sue for peace.
The exercise came in the year that US President Ronald Reagan both enraged and alarmed Moscow with his denunciation of the Soviet Union as the "evil empire", his plans for a "Star Wars" ballistic missile shield in space, and the deployment of US nuclear cruise missiles to Europe - including to RAF Greenham Common.
Tensions increased when the Soviets shot down a South Korean airliner that strayed into their airspace, killing all 269 on board.
A Nato military exercise, codenamed Able Archer, then nearly triggered an actual conflict with the Soviet leadership apparently convinced it was cover for a genuine attack.
The Soviet Union and the US later negotiated a reduction in the number of nuclear weapons, as the Cold War came to an end.
1983?

Do you think the MAD policy between ICBM nuclear powers still applies?

The money is no longer dammed because of communist/capitalist differences between the nuclear powers.

The bigger threat now is from "theologicial*" zealots with nuclear capability.

And the US falls into that category.

*yeah, yeah. theological is an oxymoron.
Thinking

UK

#5359 Aug 1, 2013
The UK publishes its secrets after 30 years. The Queen won't even have seen this speech until now. I don't know why Lincoln is spamming this.
greymouser wrote:
<quoted text>
1983?
Do you think the MAD policy between ICBM nuclear powers still applies?
The money is no longer dammed because of communist/capitalist differences between the nuclear powers.
The bigger threat now is from "theologicial*" zealots with nuclear capability.
And the US falls into that category.
*yeah, yeah. theological is an oxymoron.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#5360 Aug 1, 2013
Because she mentions praying. And since the queen mentions praying that somehow means God must exist. He often gloats when some world leader or famous person mentions God in any way shape or form and then spam blasts it across several threads as his " proof " for God.
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>The UK publishes its secrets after 30 years. The Queen won't even have seen this speech until now. I don't know why Lincoln is spamming this.
Thinking

UK

#5361 Aug 1, 2013
Supreme Governor of the Church of England in prayer shocker.
Givemeliberty wrote:
Because she mentions praying. And since the queen mentions praying that somehow means God must exist. He often gloats when some world leader or famous person mentions God in any way shape or form and then spam blasts it across several threads as his " proof " for God.
<quoted text>

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#5362 Aug 1, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Because she mentions praying. And since the queen mentions praying that somehow means God must exist. He often gloats when some world leader or famous person mentions God in any way shape or form and then spam blasts it across several threads as his " proof " for God.
<quoted text>
He's desperate for attention--**any** attention will do.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 6 min Kaitlin the Wolf ... 7,378
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 16 min NoahLovesU 239,098
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 20 min lozzza 19,032
News Phil Robertson talks against Atheists 34 min superwilly 113
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 3 hr NoahLovesU 7,465
why Atheists believe in incest,pedophilia and b... Sun hpcaban 30
News .com | What hope is there without God? May 20 Kaitlin the Wolf ... 26
More from around the web