“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#590 Jan 9, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no contradictions.
Your picture is painful to look at. The fact that you make it worse with goth make-up is a deliberate attempt to terrorize the innocent readers.
And, while you spend a lot of time thinking about suicide, your advice does not work the same for your situation. Suicide would ABSOLUTELY solve your problem.
You would look funny too if you sat on a mangina every day.

Since: Mar 11

United States

#591 Jan 9, 2013
And an open mind asks for proof for claims. It is the bigot who gets upset at being asked for proof for their unreasonable claims.
demomode wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't a sceptic. A true sceptic keeps an open mind. You're an unregenerate bigot.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#592 Jan 9, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I'm not worried about it any more than I would be worried about a banner add that featured a cat turd.
I just don't want to have to look at it.
That's why I requested you take down your picture, so as to prevent the negative effect it has on the over all visual feel of the Topix page.
It is interesting though that you are now attacking Aura for having low self esteem since it was his position, not mine, that the opinions of others is the only thing that matters.
I'll be sure to pass along your opinion of him.
Oh, can't help but notice you STILL haven't presented your evidence.
I'll vouch for your inflated ego.

xD

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#593 Jan 9, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
I ponder if Nugglet even has friends online. I mean he obvious is a recluse, whether by choice or not.
Says the jackass who has made over 13,000 posts in about 9 months. Talk about projection.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#594 Jan 9, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
This from the guy who regularly changes people's wording in their quotes to make it seem like they are saying something else.
If you criticize my integrity, it means I'm doing the right thing.
He is sick.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#595 Jan 9, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
When did I claim you were even remotely important in my life?
You are aware that people can infer your position by what you say, right?

So, when you spend 20 or so posts talking about how much you've studied my posts and then proceed to talk about going back on older threads to read older posts, you are giving away the game.
Enough stalling what supernatural powers was he supposed to have had? Waiting waiting waiting zzzzzz waiting waiting any year now Nuggin.
<quoted text>
As I've said multiple times now, this question was already answered by Aura. You would have to check with his post on the subject, but from what I remember it was something about ensuring the sunrise and controlling the Nile.

However, as I've now stated at least 50x. The Pharaohs didn't _actually_ have these powers. Just like Thor doesn't _actually_ cause thunder (since he doesn't exist).

Actually having powers is not a requirement for godhood since there have been literally thousands of gods and to date none of them have actually had any powers.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#596 Jan 9, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
You know Nuggin your criteria for a god keeps radically changing. It has to be believed to have supernatural powers until it doesn't. It has to be thought to kill those to who don't in it until it doesn't and the contradictions keep coming.
Here do this. Make your definitive criteria for a god, no more adding and subtracting as you go along like a freak with ADHD. Make your definition and stuck with it.
Ready. Set. Go!
For someone who claims to have read my earlier posts, you certainly have a way of getting them completely wrong.

Not only hasn't my position changed on this, it's been repeated VERBATIM in dozens of posts.

The definition is:
"A person/place/thing which people _believe_ has supernatural powers and requires worship."

Belief in the power is important. Having the power is not.

ALL gods were believed to have powers.
None of them have been shown to actually have powers.

Belief is a determining characteristic.

If you can find a post in which I claim that the Pharaoh HAD to have powers to be considered a god, go ahead and provide a link to it.

Otherwise, you're just lying.

Since: Mar 11

United States

#597 Jan 9, 2013
I have spent 20 posts talking about studying your posts? Where post them.

Hurry up now puppet or fail yet again.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
You are aware that people can infer your position by what you say, right?
So, when you spend 20 or so posts talking about how much you've studied my posts and then proceed to talk about going back on older threads to read older posts, you are giving away the game.

Since: Mar 11

United States

#598 Jan 10, 2013
I deleted your babbling and Ad Homs just to save time because I want to get to the heart of the matter and not your obfuscations and distractions.

Now this is your definition of a god? You are sure? Absolutely sure? Take a minute and chew it over because at other times you also threw in other qualifiers like they think the god will kill them all if they don't worship or that a religion must be created around said god. So before I go any further I am giving you another chance to change add or subtract something from your hand picked definition.

See I want to be sure this is the one solid definition you will stand by and not falter or change it up again as you go along like you did before with the killing and religion started around the so called god.

No seriously read your definition and if you need to make an adjustment do it now because future adjustments to your definition will only bury you deeper in your logical fallacies.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
The definition is:
"A person/place/thing which people _believe_ has supernatural powers and requires worship."
.
Up there, are you totally sure this is what you want to stand on? Last chance before the fun starts :)

Since: Mar 11

United States

#599 Jan 10, 2013
Who else is laughing themselves silly at Nuggin first time and again beg people to read his posts in other threads but then go off when you do as he asked? Lmfao!

What a mommy's boy! How dare you do what I begged you to do?!! Oh and then after you mention you did it once he blow that up into 20 plus posts. I see numbers aren't his friend :))

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#600 Jan 10, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Who else is laughing themselves silly at Nuggin first time and again beg people to read his posts in other threads but then go off when you do as he asked? Lmfao!
What a mommy's boy! How dare you do what I begged you to do?!! Oh and then after you mention you did it once he blow that up into 20 plus posts. I see numbers aren't his friend :))
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a!
I think it's a teenage kid of some sort who has zero self perception.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#601 Jan 10, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>SO, what you are saying is that you do not understand the burden of proof?
In fact I'm saying I understand the burden of proof so well, that I recognise it is not my place to prove a negative.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#602 Jan 10, 2013
The liars that invented god have the burden of proof,

Atheists don't have to supply jack sh*t (although scientists do a great job already)

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#603 Jan 10, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
In fact I'm saying I understand the burden of proof so well, that I recognise it is not my place to prove a negative.
Then how can you claim fact with out proof of that fact?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#604 Jan 10, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Says the jackass who has made over 13,000 posts in about 9 months. Talk about projection.
I have friends online, so meh, I'm going to be online a lot as a result.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#605 Jan 10, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>You would look funny too if you sat on a mangina every day.
Still zero evidence for any of your assertions. Still providing more evidence that you are a liar. How cute. Let's make more of these posts visible for all to see, that god delusions are detrimental in many ways.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#606 Jan 10, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
And an open mind asks for proof for claims. It is the bigot who gets upset at being asked for proof for their unreasonable claims.
<quoted text>
If you enter an argument against God's existence then you are saying that God doesn't exist. You are making a claim. The assertion that God doesn't exist is as much a positive claim as the assertion that God does exist. The burdon of proof is shared. It is incumbent upon both sides to provide the evidence to support their claims which you have yet to do. It is the intolerant bigot, not an open mind who rejects evidence provided when he refuses to provide it himself.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#607 Jan 10, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Still zero evidence for any of your assertions. Still providing more evidence that you are a liar. How cute. Let's make more of these posts visible for all to see, that god delusions are detrimental in many ways.
This is an opinion, not a fact.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#608 Jan 10, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Then how can you claim fact with out proof of that fact?
Ignosticism -- can something for which there is no definition be considered to even possibly exist?

(Whether it exists or not does not change the idea that consideration without definition is absurd.)

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#609 Jan 10, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
I have spent 20 posts talking about studying your posts? Where post them.
Hurry up now puppet or fail yet again.
<quoted text>
Not what I said. Funny, would make your argument a strawman.

How about you go back and re-read my post to figure out what I actually said.

Oh, and pot/kettle/black you get the idea.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 7 min Eagle 12 2,214
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Aura Mytha 232,701
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 1 hr Thinking 23,171
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 9 hr _Bad Company 1,437
God' existence 13 hr polymath257 55
A New Kinder, Gentler Atheism 13 hr polymath257 112
Is 'naturalism' a bleak philosophical outlook? ... 14 hr Geezerjock 1
Evidence for God! 17 hr ChristineM 366
More from around the web