Science Disproves Evolution
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#167 Apr 5, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
I yeah, the argument from obviousity, who can disagree eh?
You. You f cked up and refused to retract your mistake. You've acted like a fundie ever since.(shrug)

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#168 Apr 5, 2013
Pahu wrote:
Codes, Programs, and Information 4
All isolated systems, including living organisms, have specific, but perishable, amounts of information. No isolated system has ever been shown to increase its information content significantly (f). Nor do natural processes increase information;
Pahu, I have a few questions for you:

1) Are you an isolated living organism?
2) Do your cells contain "information"?
3) Does your brain store "information"?
4) Do you have more cells or store more information now than you did the minute you were born?

Assuming you are like literally EVERYONE ELSE ON THE PLANET you'll have to admit that you are an isolated living organism who's information content has increased during the course of your lifetime.

Ergo, the statement above which claims that that never happens is disproven by your ability to post the quote.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169 Apr 5, 2013
Ah, the two pair of balls, right on time.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
You. You f cked up and refused to retract your mistake. You've acted like a fundie ever since.(shrug)
Says the tw*t who doesn't understand the burden of proof and is still unable to provide an example of something that is both real and unfalsifiable after 2 years.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#171 Apr 5, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the tw*t who doesn't understand the burden of proof and is still unable to provide an example of something that is both real and unfalsifiable after 2 years.
Can you prove that he is unable to provide an example?

He's provided plenty. they are on several threads now. You've seen them.

Your continued lies don't negate what people can easily look up.

Further, the moon landing DID happen.
Thinking

Staines, UK

#172 Apr 5, 2013
I hope you found the time to see the youtube video in my post#165.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove that he is unable to provide an example?
He's provided plenty. they are on several threads now. You've seen them.
Your continued lies don't negate what people can easily look up.
Further, the moon landing DID happen.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#173 Apr 5, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove that he is unable to provide an example?
He's provided plenty. they are on several threads now. You've seen them.
Indeedy. That includes this thread.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#174 Apr 5, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Ah, the two pair of balls, right on time.
Speaking of which, since you judged Nuggin's post as "spam, nuts and disagree" does this also mean you reject evolution? That is not an unfair assessment of you considering the fact he accepts and is arguing for evolution against a young Earth creationist.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#175 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of which, since you judged Nuggin's post as "spam, nuts and disagree" does this also mean you reject evolution? That is not an unfair assessment of you considering the fact he accepts and is arguing for evolution against a young Earth creationist.
Oh, we already know Skippy doesn't believe in Evolution.

That became clear when he trotted out his belief that C-14 dating was fake.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#176 Apr 6, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove that he is unable to provide an example?
He's provided plenty. they are on several threads now. You've seen them.
Your continued lies don't negate what people can easily look up.
Further, the moon landing DID happen.
Ah, the right testicle responds when I highlight the fact that the right testicle still doesn't know what the burden of proof is and cannot present anything that is both real and unfalsifiable.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#177 Apr 6, 2013
Thinking wrote:
I hope you found the time to see the youtube video in my post#165.
<quoted text>
Ah look, Nuggin's left testicle is also trying to dishonestly tell us something obvious too.

What's that? You discovered that humans landed on the moon?

Well done. Now if you can learn about the burden of proof and back up your assertion that something that is both real and falsifiable exists...

Thought not Nuggin's left testicle, thought not.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#178 Apr 6, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of which, since you judged Nuggin's post as "spam, nuts and disagree" does this also mean you reject evolution?
Paranoid. Can you prove that I marked Nuggin's post as spam nuts and disagree? Nope.

Are you apt to make up bullsh*t when you are losing an argument? Yes.

Are you two in fact a pair of testicles posing at two separate posters? Absolutely.

To be clear, you're accusing me of denying evolution, when I f*cking name is Skeptic.

You must hate losing arguments for you to stoop to such dishonesty.

Thank goodness neither of you are atheist.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#179 Apr 6, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, we already know Skippy doesn't believe in Evolution.
That became clear when he trotted out his belief that C-14 dating was fake.
Oh I see, you chose to make another mistake and accuse the person that whipped your a$$ in factual debate of denying evolution.

I speak for the whole forum when I say go f*ck yourself troll.

You should have stayed the f*ck away like the last time your embarrassed yourself here.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#180 Apr 6, 2013
When I say: "The moon landing DID happen"

Skippy responds:
-Skeptic- wrote:
still doesn't know what the burden of proof is
What more proof do you need than the fact that it was BROADCAST LIVE to the ENTIRE WORLD?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181 Apr 6, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, we already know Skippy doesn't believe in Evolution.
That became clear when he trotted out his belief that C-14 dating was fake.
I bet when your Teacher gave you an F, your response was:

"But Teacher, the alphabet has 24 letters! 24 letters I tell you!! Why do you DENY that the alphabet has 24 letters!
I didn't get an F, I'm always right...sob..sob.. sob...wah wah wah!" - Extract from Nuggin & his left testicle, The Dude's schooldays.

Well done, you earned yourself another link to your thread where you are exposed as a shameless unintellgent troll.

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#182 Apr 6, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I see, you chose to make another mistake and accuse the person that whipped your a$$ in factual debate of denying evolution.
I gave a long and detailed explanation of how C-14 dating is crosschecked against other sources of dating information.

You declared it all "bullshit".

Now you are claiming that you whipped my ass by disproving C-14 dating?

Skippy, you don't even know what side of the debate you are on

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183 Apr 6, 2013
Teacher: "Nuggin, today you get an F, I'm ashamed of your ability to construct arguments."
Nuggin: "Why do you DENY the alphabet has 24 letters?!?!"
Teacher: "Actually it's 26"
Nuggin: "Why do you DENY the alphabet has 26 letters?!?!"
Teacher: "You still get an F"
Nuggin: "Bu..wh..Why do you deny Spain is a Country?"
Teacher: "There are no letters below F I can give you son, now just go home and study."

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#184 Apr 6, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
When I say: "The moon landing DID happen"
There are thing people don't being up in debate because they are not point of debate or a point of argument - they are simply facts.

And the moon landing is one of those things.

I know you still find the moon landings amazing and awesome as we all do, but bringing up this fact of human acheivement has zero relevance to this debate.
Thinking

Staines, UK

#185 Apr 6, 2013
GFY.
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah look, Nuggin's left testicle is also trying to dishonestly tell us something obvious too.
What's that? You discovered that humans landed on the moon?
Well done. Now if you can learn about the burden of proof and back up your assertion that something that is both real and falsifiable exists...
Thought not Nuggin's left testicle, thought not.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#186 Apr 6, 2013
Pahu wrote:
Codes, Programs, and Information 4

<Snipped mercifully for all so they don't have to look at it again but actually ran into the Topix posting limit>
I see that you don't even bother to reply to criticisms of Walt Brown's material.

Instead, you just continue to copy and paste his work.

You can quote published material for a variety of reasons.

However, you do realize that you are going beyond the intent of copyright?

I can only think of two conclusions:

A) you are Walt Brown and trying to spam the boards to get people to buy your waste of trees.

B) You will be paying Walt Brown royalties out of your pocket for copying his work.

Bonus conclusion:

C) Rules don't apply to you when you are righteous. As long as you are your righteous and not some other heathen religion righteous.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 min Eagle 12 243,502
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr Eagle 12 9,496
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 8 hr TC_Tia 14,656
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 8 hr MikeF 19,806
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) Sun thetruth 6,221
News Atheism must be about more than just not believ... Jul 4 Amused 2
Should atheists have the burden of proof? Jul 4 thetruth 38
More from around the web