The data from WAMP suggests an indetermate extent of the universe vs. a bounded one, not an infinite universe.<quoted text>
You are so intent on dissing me that you did not read my response did you? jeez what a moron you are. I never mentioned the size of infinity, infinity can be infinitely large or infinitely small. What I did mention was the size of the computer you dumbo.
And something stupid would be thick and something thick is not necessarily stupid right?
You have of course either ignored the data obtained by WMAP or you ly ignore it, my guess is that you ignore it because it fooks with your god dunitwiv magic dream.
Nope, Poly did not loose the argument with you, you simply stomped your foot, ignored the reality and claimed you were right because you said so as is the butt crack way. More or less in the same way you stomp your feet, make up BS and lies about what I said and what I didnt say and claim you are right because you are the bully.
You're seizing on one word wrongly applied.
You don't understand the discussion.
Perhaps you should discuss it with Thinking. He's almost as clueless as you.