Since: May 10

Location hidden

#782 Jul 5, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so intent on dissing me that you did not read my response did you? jeez what a moron you are. I never mentioned the size of infinity, infinity can be infinitely large or infinitely small. What I did mention was the size of the computer you dumbo.
<quoted text>
And something stupid would be thick and something thick is not necessarily stupid right?
You have of course either ignored the data obtained by WMAP or you ly ignore it, my guess is that you ignore it because it fooks with your god dunitwiv magic dream.
Nope, Poly did not loose the argument with you, you simply stomped your foot, ignored the reality and claimed you were right because you said so as is the butt crack way. More or less in the same way you stomp your feet, make up BS and lies about what I said and what I didnt say and claim you are right because you are the bully.
The data from WAMP suggests an indetermate extent of the universe vs. a bounded one, not an infinite universe.

You're seizing on one word wrongly applied.

You don't understand the discussion.

Perhaps you should discuss it with Thinking. He's almost as clueless as you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#783 Jul 5, 2014
IF INFINITY WERE REAL,....HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE FOR AN APPLE TO FALL FROM A TREE TO THE GROUND?

Answer: It could never fall.

Explanation: For an apple to fall from a limb, and the distance to the ground being divisible into infinite segments of length, no finite amount of time would allow the apple to reach the ground, because traversing infinite lengths of distance of any size would take forever and longer - it could not be traversed in finite time.

Further, when it broke free from the tree, the apple would simply float in the air forever. This is because the first movement over distance could also be divided into infinite segments, so for the same reason, the first visible movement would never be able to be witnessed.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#784 Jul 5, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
We live in an expanding universe.
No sequence of expansion by addition can be infinite. Period.
The universe contains a finite, calculated quantity of particles.
No finite quantity of particles can be expanded to an infinite extent. Period.
An infinite universe is, therefore, not possible.
I logically destroyed every argument Polymath offered. He even tried to burnish his argument by offering the following proof that a 10' length could be divided into infinite segments greater than zero:
Dividing by 1/2, 1/4, 1/8,....
Of course, the trick there is he is simply using a premise based on infinite division to prove infinite division, which is a circular tautology.
A 10' segmnent divided in ANY fashion would have to require that the segments added would extend the same 10'. Infinite segments of any length greater than zero, when totaled, would be infinitely long, not 10' long.
While his argument is erroneoous, your arguments get nowhere near that good.
Wrong, you are assuming the visible universe is the entire universe. A limitation of your understanding no doubt, but none the less a limitation

Wrong again, you illogically introduced incredulity and childish arguments based on magic and wet dreams and shouted and stomped your foot until, no doubt, Poly thought something along the lines of this guys a nut case of little intelligence so fook it

Honey, I am not even arguing, I am stating scientific fact and I have provided up to date NASA and WMAP information as verification. You have provided what, 60, 120, 200 year old statements.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#785 Jul 5, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The data from WAMP suggests an indetermate extent of the universe vs. a bounded one, not an infinite universe.
You're seizing on one word wrongly applied.
You don't understand the discussion.
Perhaps you should discuss it with Thinking. He's almost as clueless as you.
And again you are assuming the visible universe is the entire universe.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#786 Jul 5, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
IF INFINITY WERE REAL,....HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE FOR AN APPLE TO FALL FROM A TREE TO THE GROUND?
Answer: It could never fall.
Explanation: For an apple to fall from a limb, and the distance to the ground being divisible into infinite segments of length, no finite amount of time would allow the apple to reach the ground, because traversing infinite lengths of distance of any size would take forever and longer - it could not be traversed in finite time.
Further, when it broke free from the tree, the apple would simply float in the air forever. This is because the first movement over distance could also be divided into infinite segments, so for the same reason, the first visible movement would never be able to be witnessed.
Another buckism? Stupid comparison more akin to comparing a grain of sand to the visible universe

Would an apple drop into infinity?

Would a even tree be relevant in infinity?

Ahh, so perhaps we come to the nub of the matter, are you sh|t scared of being irrelevant?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#787 Jul 5, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And again you are assuming the visible universe is the entire universe.
No. The entire universe.

You're not up to this.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#788 Jul 5, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Another buckism? Stupid comparison more akin to comparing a grain of sand to the visible universe
Would an apple drop into infinity?
Would a even tree be relevant in infinity?
Ahh, so perhaps we come to the nub of the matter, are you sh|t scared of being irrelevant?
"Into infinity"????

"In infinity"????

You are absurd. You have not the first clue to understanding infinity.

Go get a smart person to argue your case for you.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#789 Jul 6, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Infinity is easy to understand. Trying to make it a real phenomenon is the hard part - because it isn't.
That's what you struggle with. Making something what it isn't.
Bat your head against it all you want.
What is the energy required, for say, you, to accelerate you to the speed of light?

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#790 Jul 6, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
IF INFINITY WERE REAL,....HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE FOR AN APPLE TO FALL FROM A TREE TO THE GROUND?
Answer: It could never fall.
Explanation: For an apple to fall from a limb, and the distance to the ground being divisible into infinite segments of length, no finite amount of time would allow the apple to reach the ground, because traversing infinite lengths of distance of any size would take forever and longer - it could not be traversed in finite time.
Further, when it broke free from the tree, the apple would simply float in the air forever. This is because the first movement over distance could also be divided into infinite segments, so for the same reason, the first visible movement would never be able to be witnessed.
The above is the worst explanation ever.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#791 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
The above is the worst explanation ever.
I knew you'd hate it - because it's logical.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#792 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the energy required, for say, you, to accelerate you to the speed of light?
In which hemisphere?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#793 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
The above is the worst explanation ever.
Wrong. It is an excellent explanation for the following reason:

If actual infinities exist then there cannot be any discrete computational foundation to reality.

In other words:

If an apple falls, it is proof infinities do not exist.

Welcome to Buck School. Have a seat in back next to IANS and his infinite length donut.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#794 Jul 6, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. It is an excellent explanation for the following reason:
If actual infinities exist then there cannot be any discrete computational foundation to reality.
In other words:
If an apple falls, it is proof infinities do not exist.
Welcome to Buck School. Have a seat in back next to IANS and his infinite length donut.
So your explanation is so poor that you need to answer my post twice to get over your insecurity?

Right. Apples fall forever because of infinity.

So... Buck...When are you going to take high school physics?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#795 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
So your explanation is so poor that you need to answer my post twice to get over your insecurity?
Right. Apples fall forever because of infinity.
So... Buck...When are you going to take high school physics?
No, I was trying to accommodate your poor understanding.

Fat chance.
Richardfs

Sydney, Australia

#796 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
So your explanation is so poor that you need to answer my post twice to get over your insecurity?
Right. Apples fall forever because of infinity.
So... Buck...When are you going to take high school physics?
Welcome to the new science of Butt Crack.
Richardfs

Sydney, Australia

#797 Jul 6, 2014
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
So your explanation is so poor that you need to answer my post twice to get over your insecurity?
Right. Apples fall forever because of infinity.
So... Buck...When are you going to take high school physics?
Physics? You must remember butt crack took his physicals bending over in the shower in the local jail.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#798 Jul 6, 2014
So... Buck...When are you going to take high school physics?
Buck Crick wrote:
Fat chance.
Are you sure? It could help.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#799 Jul 6, 2014
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome to the new science of Butt Crack.
As long as he believes it proves deities and designers, he's pretty happy with it.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#800 Jul 7, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No. The entire universe.
You're not up to this.
Wrong, just because you have difficulty imaging infinity does not mean infinity is not valid, it just means that you cannot image in your limited brain

What is the entire universe? Please describe (in basic buck terms but without any god magic) the entire universe

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#801 Jul 7, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
"Into infinity"????
"In infinity"????
You are absurd. You have not the first clue to understanding infinity.
Go get a smart person to argue your case for you.
In or into are both relevant
So you also have problems with the English language?
Im not surprised

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 18 min Dogen 16,693
The Consequences of Atheism 24 min Lay Worker 724
Richard Dawkins - God is evil, pedophilesa not ... (Sep '13) 42 min thetruth 3,035
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 50 min thetruth 235,586
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 54 min thetruth 4,780
Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) Fri Thinking 6,033
Is Religion Childish? Fri thetruth 136
More from around the web