More purely speculative spam. You have no idea (and neither has god goddunit wiv magic Walt Brown)Proteins 2
To form proteins, amino acids must also be highly concentrated in an extremely pure liquid (c). However, the early oceans or ponds would have been far from pure and would have diluted amino acids, so the required collisions between amino acids would rarely occur (d). Besides, amino acids do not naturally link up to form proteins. Instead, proteins tend to break down into amino acids (e).
c.It is difficult to imagine how a little pond with just these components, and no others [no contaminants], could have formed on the primitive earth. Nor is it easy to see exactly how the precursors would have arisen. Francis Crick, Life Itself (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981), p. 85.
d.But when multiple biopolymers must all converge at the same place at the same time to collectively interact in a controlled biochemical cooperative manner, faith in self-organization becomes blind belief. No empirical data or rational scientific basis exists for such a metaphysical leap. Abel and Trevors, p. 9.
e.I believe this [the overwhelming tendency for chemical reactions to move in the direction opposite to that required for the evolution of life] to be the most stubborn problem that confronts usthe weakest link at present in our argument [for the origin of life]. George Wald,The Origin of Life, p. 50.
[From "In the Beginning" by Walt Brown]
The claim by those of little intelligence that the liquid must be pure is total garbage that would not cause a junior school science class any problem. In fact consider the word pure then try again. The liquid must (MUST) contain impurities in the way of molecules in order to form proteins i.e. these impurities blow that statement out of the water right from the start.
You have (neither has good goddunit wiv magic Walt Brown) any idea of the concentrations of these molecules 3.5 BILLION years ago. Another school experiment, the MillerUrey experiment shows you (and your good godbot buddy) to be wrong.
The data is out dated and has been since the 1950s, empirical data does exist, synthetic life is a reality and science is progressing in the quest to create for natural life in the lab,
Tell me, have you ever sprinkled dust on top of water, see how the particles are ATTRACTED to each other, just another simple junior school experiment that shows the ignorance you and your buddy Walt Brown are displaying here.
What you or good godbot Walt Brown believe is beside the point, simple minded, made up mumbo jumbo because you (and he) are incapable of grasping the fact that evolution is not just a theory but proven multiples times in multiple different ways.
So I assume that you are not very clever and dont actually bother reading and certainly do not understand the garbage you copy and paste.