Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4799 Sep 19, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>All we ask is proof.

You know-- that thing your inept god cannot manage to cough up?

LOL!
You booby have been given proof

Here it is one more time just for you.

TIME is proof of creation.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4800 Sep 20, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You booby have been given proof
Nope. The Holey Babble is not proof-- it was written by men.
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
Here it is one more time just for you.
TIME is proof of creation.
Nope. You do not understand time.

As such? You cannot offer it up as proof.

But it isn't anyway....

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4801 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
These Dolt will never get it.
Nice effort but these two have a combined IQ of 1.
This is coming from the creationist that denies fossils, folks.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4802 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You booby have been given proof
Here it is one more time just for you.
TIME is proof of creation.
Foolish creationist liar.

That is all.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4803 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You booby have been given proof
Here it is one more time just for you.
TIME is proof of creation.
Atheists ask only 3 question, we ask it three times just to be extra sure that you're mentally ill.

The question is this:

1. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?

2. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?

3. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4804 Sep 21, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>This is coming from the creationist that denies fossils, folks.
LOL

Denies Fossils? Bawhahahaha

What have they asked for that I denied them? LOL

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4805 Sep 21, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>Foolish creationist liar.

That is all.
Promise?
Oh that's right your word means nothing!
-Skeptic- wrote:
Goodbye everyone. I hope you all find yourselves out there whatever you are looking for. I will however be taking retirement.

There's no such thing as god, there never has and there never will be.

I am changing the password to my account so will not be using it anymore, but it will still be there, preserving all the conversation.

If you want to contact me, you can leave your email in this thread.

Bye!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4806 Sep 21, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>Atheists ask only 3 question, we ask it three times just to be extra sure that you're mentally ill.

The question is this:

1. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?

2. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?

3. Where's the evidence of the f*cking god you lie to us about everyday?
1). TIME itself.
2). TIME itself.
3). TIME itself.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4807 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
1). TIME itself.
2). TIME itself.
3). TIME itself.
Time is not proof of the creationist god you claim is the answer to the whole universe.

Did you fall over and hit your head of something. Even a 5 year old would slap you in your face with such a f*cking stupid lie.

So we ask you again:

Where the f*ck is prove of the god you're lying to us about, creationist fool?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4808 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
1). TIME itself.
2). TIME itself.
3). TIME itself.
1) Nope.
2) Nope.
3) Nope.

Next!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4810 Sep 22, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>Time is not proof of the creationist god you claim is the answer to the whole universe.

Did you fall over and hit your head of something. Even a 5 year old would slap you in your face with such a f*cking stupid lie.

So we ask you again:

Where the f*ck is prove of the god you're lying to us about, creationist fool?
"Time is not proof of the creationist god you claim is the answer to the whole universe."

Stephen Hawkings:

"At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down. This means (magic)

Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that TIME began at the Big Bang when all the laws of physics break down. "

No laws of physics = magic.

Science must stay with in the lines of the laws of physics. Only religion is allowed outside of the lines.
Stephen Hawkings is talking religion not science.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4811 Sep 22, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>1) Nope.
2) Nope.
3) Nope.

Next!
Stephen Hawkings:

"Although the laws of science seemed to predict the universe had a beginning, they also seemed to predict that they could not determine how the universe would have begun. This is obviously very unsatisfactory. "

Must invoke magic........

(Here is where all the laws of physic break down) LOL. And they invoke magic. LOL
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#4812 Sep 22, 2013
I think it would be interesting if someone would ask the people in Colorado what they think about Noah’s flood.

They might have some valuable insight on this subject about right now. It’s interesting to note Colorado is above sea level.

Could rain cause massive flooding and billions in damage in the State of Colorado? People missing? Your opinion is greatly affected by your position. If you position is high and dry. Then your view is different than when you are at the top of a tree holding on with water rushing underneath you.

Ask someone who was just lifted off the top of a tree by helicopter if they believe Noah’s flood happened.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4813 Sep 22, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"Time is not proof of the creationist god you claim is the answer to the whole universe."
Stephen Hawkings:
Who's this "stephen hawkings"?

Never hear of him, myself-- someone you made up?

Seriously? Who is "hawkings"?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4814 Sep 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
I think it would be interesting if someone would ask the people in Colorado what they think about Noah’s flood.
They might have some valuable insight on this subject about right now. It’s interesting to note Colorado is above sea level.
Could rain cause massive flooding and billions in damage in the State of Colorado? People missing? Your opinion is greatly affected by your position. If you position is high and dry. Then your view is different than when you are at the top of a tree holding on with water rushing underneath you.
Ask someone who was just lifted off the top of a tree by helicopter if they believe Noah’s flood happened.
Anecdotal "witnesses" are not facts.

The fact is?

Noah's boat, as described? Could not stay afloat.

If you calculate the weight of the number of animals needed to fulfill "2 of each kind"?

Then, if you calculate the water displaced by the volume of Noah's boat?(**ignoring** the weight of the wood)

That boat would sink 10 times over-- the animals would have been too heavy.

Never mind the **volume** these animals would take up.

Never mind the **food** these animals would require.

Never mind the **water** these animals would need, daily.

Their weight? Would sink Noah's boat 10 times over-- assuming the boat was magic, and did not itself weigh **anything** at all.

So no.

The flood is a myth.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4815 Sep 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
I think it would be interesting if someone would ask the people in Colorado what they think about Noah’s flood.
They might have some valuable insight on this subject about right now. It’s interesting to note Colorado is above sea level.
Could rain cause massive flooding and billions in damage in the State of Colorado? People missing? Your opinion is greatly affected by your position. If you position is high and dry. Then your view is different than when you are at the top of a tree holding on with water rushing underneath you.
Ask someone who was just lifted off the top of a tree by helicopter if they believe Noah’s flood happened.
So do you think that rain can't fall, faster than it can run off? Do you think that all of Colorado was under water? Do you get, that for Colorado to be part of a world wide flood, the rest of the planet would be inundated first?

It wasn't so bad that my sister couldn't drive back to Wyoming, with just a few hundred miles of National Guard assisted backtracking, added to her trip.

Ask the helicopter operator if he has flown his bird, higher into the skies, than a desert people could have build a tower called Babel.
LCNLin

United States

#4816 Sep 22, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>So do you think that rain can't fall, faster than it can run off? Do you think that all of Colorado was under water? Do you get, that for Colorado to be part of a world wide flood, the rest of the planet would be inundated first?
It wasn't so bad that my sister couldn't drive back to Wyoming, with just a few hundred miles of National Guard assisted backtracking, added to her trip.
Ask the helicopter operator if he has flown his bird, higher into the skies, than a desert people could have build a tower called Babel.
rambling off topic again :-)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4817 Sep 23, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"Time is not proof of the creationist god you claim is the answer to the whole universe."
Stephen Hawkings:
"At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down. This means (magic)
Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that TIME began at the Big Bang when all the laws of physics break down. "
No laws of physics = magic.
Science must stay with in the lines of the laws of physics. Only religion is allowed outside of the lines.
Stephen Hawkings is talking religion not science.
Time is NOT proof of god, you ignorant creationist fool.

Time is proof of TIME!!!

Why are you even arguing back when you KNOW you have no proof of god.

You creationist liars are shameless people!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4818 Sep 23, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
rambling off topic again :-)
well stop it then.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4819 Sep 23, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Stephen Hawkings:
"Although the laws of science seemed to predict the universe had a beginning, they also seemed to predict that they could not determine how the universe would have begun. This is obviously very unsatisfactory. "
Must invoke magic........
(Here is where all the laws of physic break down) LOL. And they invoke magic. LOL
Creationist liar with no proof of god, thinks TIME is the proof of god LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

What a f*cking idiot, evolutionary reject.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 4 min thetruth 6,291
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Aura Mytha 236,762
News Who is an atheist? (May '10) 1 hr RiccardoFire 9,211
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr Dogen 17,917
News Is Religion Childish? 5 hr The Headlines 160
News Atheist monument to counter ten commandments (Jul '13) 12 hr thetruth 20
News The Consequences of Atheism 22 hr thetruth 1,106
More from around the web