Noah's flood real

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#4782 Sep 9, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
You did not answer my point: have you **ever** heard of a chihuahua and a wolf cross-breeding? No?
Your point is invalid.
It can happen.
A chichuachua is just a sub species of a dog
In a same way pigmy people cameroon are a type of human .

The only way an animal or human can produce a fertile offspring is if they are the same kind.

Lion and a tiger produces a liger but the lige is infertile.

A house cat and a serbal can produce a savanah because they are of the same kind.

A chi chua chua is a product of humans mating different species of dogs to get their desired look.

The majoroty of dog species are man made.

If theybwaned a wolf and a chichuachuanto mate they could make it happen.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4783 Sep 9, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
It can happen.
A chichuachua is just a sub species of a dog
In a same way pigmy people cameroon are a type of human .
The only way an animal or human can produce a fertile offspring is if they are the same kind.
Lion and a tiger produces a liger but the lige is infertile.
A house cat and a serbal can produce a savanah because they are of the same kind.
A chi chua chua is a product of humans mating different species of dogs to get their desired look.
The majoroty of dog species are man made.
If theybwaned a wolf and a chichuachuanto mate they could make it happen.
LOL! Seriously? The developing babies would kill the female, she'd not live long enough to give birth.

In the reverse case? A male chihuahua is too short to reach a female wolf-- but she'd as likely make a meal of him anyhow.

So you are nucking-futz.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4785 Sep 10, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct. Fossil are just dead animals no proof evolution.
Someone should introduce your forehead to a dinosaur bone.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#4786 Sep 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Seriously? The developing babies would kill the female, she'd not live long enough to give birth.
In the reverse case? A male chihuahua is too short to reach a female wolf-- but she'd as likely make a meal of him anyhow.
So you are nucking-futz.


It is possible
Take spern from thr male chihuahua and insert in the the female wolf . Bam! Its done.

If theh wanted a hihua and wolf mix they could breed easily.

A chichuahua is a freak of nature itsself.

All dogs came from wolves. Dogs are domesticated wolves it is that simple.

if you breed different dogs you can get new breeds.

A chichuahua breeding wothna wolf is the same as a pgmy woman breeding with 7foot basketball player.

If it were not possible I would not be saying it.

Wolves are dogs and thus can breed with any dog and produce fertile offspring.

Wild dogs,painted dogs,dingos, Great dane,dalmation , etc

In the same humans can breed so can dogs.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4787 Sep 10, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
It is possible
Take spern from thr male chihuahua and insert in the the female wolf . Bam! Its done.
If theh wanted a hihua and wolf mix they could breed easily.
A chichuahua is a freak of nature itsself.
All dogs came from wolves. Dogs are domesticated wolves it is that simple.
if you breed different dogs you can get new breeds.
A chichuahua breeding wothna wolf is the same as a pgmy woman breeding with 7foot basketball player.
If it were not possible I would not be saying it.
Wolves are dogs and thus can breed with any dog and produce fertile offspring.
Wild dogs,painted dogs,dingos, Great dane,dalmation , etc
In the same humans can breed so can dogs.
Thanks!

Everything you just said?

PROVES EVOLUTION IS FACT.

Or else none of your points above would be possible.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#4788 Sep 11, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he was gay.
Proof, you ask?
Think about this: Paul refused to have anything to do with... women--- in fact, it appears Paul thought women were sub-human at **best**.
Paul **always** had with him, a younger **man**.
Paul frequently wrote of his love for these younger men.
Clearly? Paul was gay.
Thanks for playing.
No paul was not gay , 2 corinthians 6:9- 11
Paul was an older man and his focus was on preaching and plus he was injured and had no time take care if a family.
He never spoke ill of women.

This is exactly why it is important to read a modern trabslation of the bible .

New english is different from old english...

It may sound odd but thats only because it is the king james version and it was translated in their english.

No one today speaks like that ..

Reading the king james version is like reading a book in the 1500s.

“Fortes Fortuna Juvat, ”

Since: Dec 09

Wichita. Ks.

#4789 Sep 12, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
No paul was not gay , 2 corinthians 6:9- 11
Paul was an older man and his focus was on preaching and plus he was injured and had no time take care if a family.
He never spoke ill of women.
This is exactly why it is important to read a modern trabslation of the bible .
New english is different from old english...
It may sound odd but thats only because it is the king james version and it was translated in their english.
No one today speaks like that ..
Reading the king james version is like reading a book in the 1500s.
You mean change words a meaning to fit your belief.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4790 Sep 12, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
No paul was not gay , 2 corinthians 6:9- 11
Really? Your verse tells of his girlfriend/wife? Let's see:
Bible wrote:
2 corinthians 6:9- 11
6 Remember this: Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows generously will also reap generously. 7 Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver. 8 And God is able to bless you abundantly, so that in all things at all times, having all that you need, you will abound in every good work. 9 As it is written:

“They have freely scattered their gifts to the poor;
their righteousness endures forever.”[a]
Nope. NOTHING in there saying one thing or another about Paul's gayness.

He was gay.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4791 Sep 12, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
Paul was an older man and his focus was on preaching and plus he was injured and had no time take care if a family.
Proof? No? But you have to admit he **preferred** the company of younger boys/men.

Paul was gay.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4792 Sep 12, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
He never spoke ill of women.
False. He said more than once, that women should shut the hell up-- ESPECIALLY in church.

(so... you are going **against** gay-paul!)

He **also** said that men should **never** marry, if possible-- but if they just **had** to, they could **stoop** so **low** as to marry a woman.

If they **really**,**really** needed someone to beat up on a Saturday night.

Paul was gay.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4793 Sep 12, 2013
Very Cynical Person wrote:
<quoted text>You mean change words a meaning to fit your belief.
Of course!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#4794 Sep 15, 2013
Very Cynical Person wrote:
<quoted text>You mean change words a meaning to fit your belief.
No..The bible was written in ancient hebrew and greek.

For example the word hail... In greek just means the common grave..

You have understand language is very complex.

The english language is very literal but ancient greek and other languages are not.

Another example in spanish there is no literal word for sugar..so they use dulce or rico but they mean sweet.

Since we speak english,They we think and understand certain things are totally different.

The bibles meaning has never changed...
It is humans who have distorted scriptures to fit popular culture.



Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4795 Sep 15, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
No..The bible was written in ancient hebrew and greek.
For example the word hail... In greek just means the common grave..
You have understand language is very complex.
The english language is very literal but ancient greek and other languages are not.
Another example in spanish there is no literal word for sugar..so they use dulce or rico but they mean sweet.
Since we speak english,They we think and understand certain things are totally different.
The bibles meaning has never changed...
It is humans who have distorted scriptures to fit popular culture.
The bible needs to correct its lies about atheists.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4796 Sep 16, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>
No..The bible was written in ancient hebrew and greek.
For example the word hail... In greek just means the common grave..
You have understand language is very complex.
The english language is very literal but ancient greek and other languages are not.
Another example in spanish there is no literal word for sugar..so they use dulce or rico but they mean sweet.
Since we speak english,They we think and understand certain things are totally different.
The bibles meaning has never changed...
It is humans who have distorted scriptures to fit popular culture.
So, basically, you are saying the bible is 100% allegory?

Okay... I can agree with that-- human written allegory, without any real connection to reality.

Good point!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4797 Sep 16, 2013
leahisadoll wrote:
<quoted text>No..The bible was written in ancient hebrew and greek.

For example the word hail... In greek just means the common grave..

You have understand language is very complex.

The english language is very literal but ancient greek and other languages are not.

Another example in spanish there is no literal word for sugar..so they use dulce or rico but they mean sweet.

Since we speak english,They we think and understand certain things are totally different.

The bibles meaning has never changed...
It is humans who have distorted scriptures to fit popular culture.
These Dolt will never get it.
Nice effort but these two have a combined IQ of 1.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4798 Sep 16, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
These Dolt will never get it.
Nice effort but these two have a combined IQ of 1.
All we ask is proof.

You know-- that thing your inept god cannot manage to cough up?

LOL!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#4799 Sep 19, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>All we ask is proof.

You know-- that thing your inept god cannot manage to cough up?

LOL!
You booby have been given proof

Here it is one more time just for you.

TIME is proof of creation.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#4800 Sep 20, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You booby have been given proof
Nope. The Holey Babble is not proof-- it was written by men.
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
Here it is one more time just for you.
TIME is proof of creation.
Nope. You do not understand time.

As such? You cannot offer it up as proof.

But it isn't anyway....

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4801 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
These Dolt will never get it.
Nice effort but these two have a combined IQ of 1.
This is coming from the creationist that denies fossils, folks.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4802 Sep 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You booby have been given proof
Here it is one more time just for you.
TIME is proof of creation.
Foolish creationist liar.

That is all.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Athetists' best bet is that there is a God. 4 min IB DaMann 80
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 9 min IB DaMann 48,829
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 40 min IB DaMann 23,565
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 48 min IB DaMann 5,713
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 6 hr Cuddles6778 21,887
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 7 hr _Susan_ 258,042
News Louisiana Christians reclaim safe space by runn... 11 hr Eagle 12 5
More from around the web