Holy War Breaks Out at Public University Over Atheism, Evolution and Intelligent Design

Oct 4, 2013 Full story: TheBlaze.com 207

When atheist activists launched a battle over intelligent design at Ball State University earlier this year, they sparked a holy war in higher education that has university officials scrambling to critically examine courses and professorial credentials.

Full Story

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#122 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
God doesn't rely on me for I have failed his laws in life. I just live life and enjoy it while I am alive. As far as someone relying on things and full of hate. Well little man all you have to do is look in the mirror, which you probably do every morning and that is why you are such an ignorant assshat because of what you see looking back at you. You rely on your meaningless words hoping to feel better about yourself hoping your assshat actions give you courage and reasons to do it all again the next day.
LOL!

You are so full of yourself, it's amusing.

But that's typical of a godbot.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#123 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is your time to shine. Show me "FACTS" on abiodenesis!
:)

It is not my place to correct your educational failures.

Besides, you are a self-admitted godbot--- you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you on your overstuffed backside.

But here's something for you to chew on:

Proof of evolution: http://www.talkorigins.org/

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#124 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Comparing abiogenesis and God is fair as can be.
No, they are nothing alike.

The whole idiotic god idea is utterly and completely without rational argument or support.

It is instead, a collection of irrational bullshyt.

Abiogenesis, on the other hand, is a **hypothesis** based on quite a long history of **experimental** support.

So far, none of the experiments have shown it to be impossible.

And that is quite **interesting**, all by itself.

But wait, there's more: the thousands of individual experiments, if taken as a whole, are strongly suggestive that abiogenesis is not only possible, but likely.

The **fact** is, if you put the dead molecules together, they operate by the rules of chemistry, and begin to assemble themselves.

All that is missing, is the details.

So you are, as usual, so full of shyt, it is leaking out your ears.

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#125 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!
You are so full of yourself, it's amusing.
But that's typical of a godbot.
You know science did a study and found out that the people who always do/use name calling do not have self confidence and know/think they are not as good/smart/pretty as the people that surround them. Makes me wonder why all of your posts have some sort of name calling in them.

That damn science. Isn't it great. LMAO

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#126 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
:)
It is not my place to correct your educational failures.
Besides, you are a self-admitted godbot--- you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you on your overstuffed backside.
But here's something for you to chew on:
Proof of evolution: http://www.talkorigins.org/
So you have nothing. Just as I thought. I have no use for you anymore.

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#127 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they are nothing alike.
The whole idiotic god idea is utterly and completely without rational argument or support.It is instead, a collection of irrational bullshyt.
So is abiogenesis. But I "guess" you take "guesses" as scientific evidence. lol
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Abiogenesis, on the other hand, is a **hypothesis** based on quite a long history of **experimental** support.
So far, none of the experiments have shown it to be impossible.
Also So far, none of the experiments have shown it to be possible either. SO what was your point again?

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#128 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
The **fact** is, if you put the dead molecules together, they operate by the rules of chemistry, and begin to assemble themselves.
I forgot to address this one.

You take a bunch of dead animals and put them together they start to assemble as well. We call that a food pile for the wild animals and bugs.

You take a bunch of dead people and they also start to assemble. We call that a grave yard.

SO again what was your point. Oh yes. Now you are saying dead, lifeless molecules assemble and make life. At the count of 3 wake up from your silly dream. LOL

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#129 Oct 10, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor baby. You will die. die. END.
Duh! If it lives, it dies, and it is over with. Life is only for the living, the dead don't get a do-over.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#130 Oct 10, 2013
Abiogenesis is still a hypothesis and aspects of it have been tested. For example, some abiogenesis hypotheses claim that a very basic cell membrane will self form. They have found that lipids will act as a very simple cell wall. That aspect of abiogenesis has been tested and found to be true.

These vesicles will naturally grow as they take in organic molecules and do not lose material when they divide. This has been found to happen too.

So aspects of abiogenesis have been shown to occur, the hypothesis is not confirmed because this is only a small part of abiogenesis.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#131 Oct 10, 2013
I have been conducting experiments to try and teach a snake to talk but I have not had great results. Any suggestions?
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
So is abiogenesis. But I "guess" you take "guesses" as scientific evidence. lol
<quoted text>
Also So far, none of the experiments have shown it to be possible either. SO what was your point again?

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#132 Oct 10, 2013
davy wrote:
I have been conducting experiments to try and teach a snake to talk but I have not had great results. Any suggestions?
<quoted text>
I would say ask someone that you thinks believes that. Your are barking up the wrong tree here. But since you want to bark in. Here is your time to shine. Show factual evidence of abiogenesis - life coming from none life.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#133 Oct 10, 2013
That's funny, I thought you believed in the bible. I have no idea what none life is. Is that something Christians do? "Thinks believes that"? What does that mean?
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say ask someone that you thinks believes that. Your are barking up the wrong tree here. But since you want to bark in. Here is your time to shine. Show factual evidence of abiogenesis - life coming from none life.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#134 Oct 10, 2013
davy wrote:
I have been conducting experiments to try and teach a snake to talk but I have not had great results. Any suggestions?
<quoted text>
Try a naked lady. It was supposed to have worked once.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#135 Oct 10, 2013
I asked my wife to get naked but she didn't believe my snake could really talk. I am a shitty ventriloquist. She wouldn't give my snake a kiss no matter how many times I asked.
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Try a naked lady. It was supposed to have worked once.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#136 Oct 10, 2013
davy wrote:
I asked my wife to get naked but she didn't believe my snake could really talk. I am a shitty ventriloquist. She wouldn't give my snake a kiss no matter how many times I asked.
<quoted text>
Try some sacramental libations.

“Lets all play DantheDipshyts”

Since: Mar 13

game.of annoyance. It's fun.

#137 Oct 10, 2013
davy wrote:
I asked my wife to get naked but she didn't believe my snake could really talk. I am a shitty ventriloquist. She wouldn't give my snake a kiss no matter how many times I asked.
<quoted text>
Just because I am fed up with grey box tards I am going to be an @ssss. You say you asked your wife to get naked but she didn't believe your snake could really talk and she wouldn't give your snake a kiss no matter how many times you asked.

Maybe she is tired of your limp little worm. Maybe some one else's snake is taking to her and getting her kisses. Just a thought.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#138 Oct 11, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because I am fed up with grey box tards I am going to be an @ssss. You say you asked your wife to get naked but she didn't believe your snake could really talk and she wouldn't give your snake a kiss no matter how many times you asked.
Maybe she is tired of your limp little worm. Maybe some one else's snake is taking to her and getting her kisses. Just a thought.
When you can prove the god your cult sent you here to lie about, you won't get asked how to talk to snakes.

It's your cults fault for telling these lies and sticking by them, instead of admitting that not only are they lies - they are stupid, unbelievable lies - the foundation of your cult.

You can't hide this fact as much as you try- your cult is believed by imbeciles.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#139 Oct 11, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
You take a bunch of dead people and they also start to assemble. We call that a grave yard.
L
I've never seen dead people assemble themselves. I've seen ignorant theists, arrange dead bodies around in graveyards, to comfort themselves of their losses, but never seen no zombies.

You need to try a better lie, that isn't as stupid sounding.
Thinking

UK

#140 Oct 11, 2013
Therefore you need to prove god exists - otherwise you are a hypocrite.
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to disprove it. The burden of proof/evidence for something lies upon the person/persons saying it is true. Those are the rules of evolutionists.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#141 Oct 11, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
Do show some evidence where they have tested/observed abiogenesis.
If it had been observed, we would know how it worked. Which is why it is still in the hypothesis stage.

A whole ton of hypotheses and experimentation here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 26 min Joe fortuna 233,088
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 2 hr geezerjock 23,259
$13.5m for jehovah’s witness sex victim 2 hr P_Smith 2
Is 'naturalism' a bleak philosophical outlook? ... 2 hr P_Smith 9
Christians More Supportive of Torture Than Non-... 3 hr Reason Personified 16
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 4 hr woodtick57 2,612
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 5 hr Morse 1,455
More from around the web