Holy War Breaks Out at Public Univers...

Holy War Breaks Out at Public University Over Atheism, Evolution and Intelligent Design

There are 207 comments on the TheBlaze.com story from Oct 4, 2013, titled Holy War Breaks Out at Public University Over Atheism, Evolution and Intelligent Design. In it, TheBlaze.com reports that:

When atheist activists launched a battle over intelligent design at Ball State University earlier this year, they sparked a holy war in higher education that has university officials scrambling to critically examine courses and professorial credentials.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TheBlaze.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#102 Oct 10, 2013
What's the matter you discovery institute POS replaytime? cat got your tongue?

Keep your unproven religious bullsh*t coming, I think you enjoy the embarrassment.

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#103 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
What is funny is the only person bringing God into my comments is you!
Poor baby. You will die. die. END.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104 Oct 10, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Lets watch replaytime meltdown and insult atheists, instead of prove the god he was caught lying about for his fraudulent 2005 failed neocon cult.
Looks to me like your the one having the meltdown by all your ranting. Close your eyes and click your heels together Dorothy. It will all work out.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#105 Oct 10, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor baby. You will die. die. END.
Funny you join in on their rant. I never said God was real. What I did say is that abiogenesis has no evidence of being true and look at you all go on like someone stole your piece of candy. LMAO

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#106 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny you join in on their rant. I never said God was real. What I did say is that abiogenesis has no evidence of being true and look at you all go on like someone stole your piece of candy. LMAO
I look at you and see someone who dearly wishes but knows better.

This is your life.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#107 Oct 10, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I look at you and see someone who dearly wishes but knows better.
This is your life.
WOW! Now you are a psychic. Any more hidden talents? LOL

I look at you and and and,,, I don't play your silly little games but hey if it entertains you and gets your jolly's off help yourself. lol

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#108 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
Do show some evidence where they have tested/observed abiogenesis.
First?

SHOW ME WHERE I EVER CLAIMED "THEORY" WITH RESPECT TO ABIOGENESIS.

You first, Oh Great Liar Of God.

If you had been paying attention?

You would note I always say "hypothesis" when referring to abiogenesis.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#109 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would God or a God feel the need to defend himself to idiots?
A sense of responsibility?

Since, according to your god-idiots, the CONSEQUENCES are so ... infinite.

Any god who was GOOD?

Would feel that responsibility to make certain the message wasn't garbled.

But 40,000 DIFFERENT flavors of Genuine Christianity¬ô is ample proof:

THE MESSAGE IS GARBLED BEYOND ALL RECOGNITION.

So yeah-- it actually IS up to this god-beast to act...

... responsibly.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#110 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would God or a God feel the need to defend himself to idiots?
Exactly. There is no reason of it.
Is love real? You hear about love, you talk about love, you feel love.
But you can't see it. You can't actually get ahold of it and feel it. It can't defend itself. So it must not be real right?
Your god cannot defend itself.

Proof?

He relies on the likes of ....

... hate-filled and ugly little old ...

....... you.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#111 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I suggest you stop doing so.
See?

Your god has to rely on someone as idiotic as ...

.... you.

That?

That is 100% proof your god isn't ...

.... god material.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#112 Oct 10, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Lets watch replaytime meltdown and insult atheists, instead of prove the god he was caught lying about for his fraudulent 2005 failed neocon cult.
Yep... his meltdown **is** growing more shrill.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#113 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks to me like your the one having the meltdown by all your ranting. Close your eyes and click your heels together Dorothy. It will all work out.
More proof your god is woefully inept.

He keeps relying on ...

.... YOU.

How embarrassing that must be for your god...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#114 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny you join in on their rant. I never said God was real. What I did say is that abiogenesis has no evidence of being true and look at you all go on like someone stole your piece of candy. LMAO
Actually?

You did-- multiple times.

You kept trying to compare **science** with your silly idea of "god" as if the two were equal.

What a ludicrous idea.

Science? Is entirely **fact** based.

God? Is 100% bullsh8t-based.

The two are nothing alike.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#115 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
First?
SHOW ME WHERE I EVER CLAIMED "THEORY" WITH RESPECT TO ABIOGENESIS.
You first, Oh Great Liar Of God.
If you had been paying attention?
You would note I always say "hypothesis" when referring to abiogenesis.
You can gripe, complain and whine but you can't read well.

Let's look at our posts again.

I say "if neither can be proven do not teach either. God or abiogenesis."

You say ""god" isn't a valid hypothesis." (Which I never claimed he was) It's abiogenesis or some other **reasonable** mechanism.(which you fail to name)

Abiogenesis is a hypothesis. I said "A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.

Do show some evidence where they have tested/observed abiogenesis.

Then you say "SHOW ME WHERE I EVER CLAIMED "THEORY" WITH RESPECT TO ABIOGENESIS."

I say show me where I said you did or STFU.

You say "you always say "hypothesis" when referring to abiogenesis."

Again I say "A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.

Do show some evidence where they have tested/observed abiogenesis. or STFU

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#116 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
See?
Your god has to rely on someone as idiotic as ...
.... you.
That?
That is 100% proof your god isn't ...
.... god material.
God doesn't rely on me for I have failed his laws in life. I just live life and enjoy it while I am alive. As far as someone relying on things and full of hate. Well little man all you have to do is look in the mirror, which you probably do every morning and that is why you are such an ignorant assshat because of what you see looking back at you. You rely on your meaningless words hoping to feel better about yourself hoping your assshat actions give you courage and reasons to do it all again the next day.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#117 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually?
You did-- multiple times.
You kept trying to compare **science** with your silly idea of "god" as if the two were equal.
What a ludicrous idea.
Science? Is entirely **fact** based.
God? Is 100% bullsh8t-based.
The two are nothing alike.
Here is your time to shine. Show me "FACTS" on abiodenesis!
Thinking

Royston, UK

#118 Oct 10, 2013
So you can't disprove abiogenesis.
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny you join in on their rant. I never said God was real. What I did say is that abiogenesis has no evidence of being true and look at you all go on like someone stole your piece of candy. LMAO

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#119 Oct 10, 2013
Thinking wrote:
So you can't disprove abiogenesis.
<quoted text>
I don't have to disprove it. The burden of proof/evidence for something lies upon the person/persons saying it is true. Those are the rules of evolutionists.

“It is what it is”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#120 Oct 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
You kept trying to compare **science** with your silly idea of "god" as if the two were equal.
Comparing abiogenesis and God is fair as can be. There is no evidence for either one but yet your faith allows you to believe in abiogenesis and your hate allows you not to believe in a God even though neither have evidence supporting them. That is what is called a choice. A choice not based on evidence but on what you feel and want to believe.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#121 Oct 10, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
You can gripe, complain and whine but you can't read well.
Let's look at our posts again.
I say "if neither can be proven do not teach either. God or abiogenesis."
There you go!

You, in a stupid fit of insanity, think that the idiotic idea "god" is on equal footing with ... science.

You are batshit insane.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 min Eagle 12 - 78,706
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 23 min Eagle 12 - 1,411
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 5 hr Regolith Based Li... 32,454
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... Aug 12 Eagle 12 - 1,152
what science will NEVER be able to prove Aug 11 Eagle 12 - 5
News What Ever Happened to the New Atheists?by Ellio... Aug 7 nanoanomaly 1
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... (Jan '17) Aug 5 yehoshooah adam 4,381
More from around the web