Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

[Dave Nelson]

Goodnight people and Topix atheists.

:-)

[Anon]

Dave Nelson wrote:

<quoted text>
You lose, sucker.
Double run in trump.

You cheated, somehow...

[TheBlackSheep]

Dave Nelson wrote:

Goodnight people and Topix atheists.
:-)

Good night, WAG2!

[River Tam]

Dave Nelson wrote:

Goodnight people and Topix atheists.
:-)

Don't forget to soak your teeth and take your Maalox.

[Anon]

Dave Nelson wrote:

<quoted text>
You lose, sucker.
Double run in trump.

Wait a minute here. Double run in trump? That's pinochle! You play pinochle? Blecht...

[Aura Mytha]

Dave Nelson wrote:

Goodnight people and Topix atheists.
:-)

Good night Gram-paw.

[scaritual]

River Tam wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't forget to soak your teeth and take your Maalox.

I think Dave is on a Maalox IV drip.

[River Tam]

scaritual wrote:

<quoted text>
I think Dave is on a Maalox IV drip.

Maalox 4 drip?

I saw Malcolm X but I missed Malcolm I - IX.

Was Denzel in all of them?

[bohart]

TheBlackSheep wrote:

<quoted text>
God of the gaps.
There is support for the hypotheses.
People used to believe that maggots spontaneously came into being from rotting meat or some other such nonliving substance. Louis Pasteur proved that was wrong.
But Abiogenesis would have happened, if it happened, in an entirely different environment than what we have now. You will agree that we know a lot more about the early Earth then they did back in the 1700's, right?
So, what you are doing, not very cleverly, is using the 1700's science to prove that we don't have a clue today. Jump up to the 21st Century! Look at what is going on in science today.
Get out of the gaps and look at what science has done sans god.

And the idiot hits keep on rolling! The enviroment would have to had been able to support life, wylie coyote, like today. And it is you SUPER GENIUSES who are stuck in the 1700's thinking spontaneous generation is a plausible idea.

[bohart]

TheBlackSheep wrote:

<quoted text>
What science do you have supporting your views? Please don't say "creationist science"!

Hey boy! I say again , why does science not support abiogenesis with any evidence?

[madscot]

bohart wrote:

<quoted text>
And the idiot hits keep on rolling! The enviroment would have to had been able to support life, wylie coyote, like today. And it is you SUPER GENIUSES who are stuck in the 1700's thinking spontaneous generation is a plausible idea.

Who says the enviroment couldn't have supported life?

[Aura Mytha]

bohart wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey boy! I say again , why does science not support abiogenesis with any evidence?

Science does not support flies being created from nothing in corpses.
Which is the definition you are using from the 18th century when they thought it was so through spontaneous generation.
This has been explained to you, but you insist on saying it.
It only makes you look like a foolish troll.

Science supports the new meaning of the term, which is a chemical evolutionary origin of life.
Despite your denial and refusal to recognize it.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abio...

[Givemeliberty]

Dave a chimpanzee has a better short term memory than you.

Dave Nelson wrote:

<quoted text>
A map of your brain would be like driving across Montana. Lots of space between points of interest. Good place for wind farms or billboards.

[Givemeliberty]

So Jesus must have done it yes?

mtimber wrote:

<quoted text>
So how did it form, if the physical laws were not there to form it with?
Your beliefs make no sense.

[Givemeliberty]

The KJV was heavily altered to match the teachings of the Church of England.

Wow you are bad at this.

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
In reference to the number of interpretations to the bible. It is a free market and groups have tried the maximize the number of sells. If they make a new version then perhaps people will by it and bring profits up. Kind of like a new model change every other year for the Chevrolet.
In 2006, there were approximately 45,000 different types of wine being produced in the world. Recently that number was increased to 75,000. But all these wines have something in common, fermentation and alcohol.
The King James Version is probably the least altered version in history. The Amplified is a good version that makes it more simple to understand. We have little control over the free market of the number one seller of all times.
http://mykitchenpot.com/wine-tip-10-how-many-...

[Givemeliberty]

He must play a much different version of chess than we do!

Catcher1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hahaha, RR.
Think about what you wrote.

[Givemeliberty]

Because as you said, you can't have a checkmate unless you have a great hand.

River Tam wrote:

<quoted text>
Maalox 4 drip?
I saw Malcolm X but I missed Malcolm I - IX.
Was Denzel in all of them?

[Aura Mytha]

Givemeliberty wrote:

He must play a much different version of chess than we do!
<quoted text>

Yeah, you know he plays pigeon chess.

[River Tam]

Givemeliberty wrote:

Because as you said, you can't have a checkmate unless you have a great hand.
<quoted text>

Put that hand on me again....

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Givemeliberty]

I'll see your bishop and raise you a ace! Behold! 3 bishops! Read them and weep!

Lol

River Tam wrote:

<quoted text>
Put that hand on me again....
http://www.youtube.com/watch...