Even less implication that it self organized out of chaos. Much less.<quoted text>
The point is that non-random does not imply there is an intelligence producing it. A very fundamental mistake.
It is something you can not discount as gratuitously as some try to do. You cans step back and remove the assumption of original source and its means of doing such while doing your back engineering, which is something countless theist and deist scientists have done for a while,
You don't keep the rational middle ground by flat out denying that which you don't know.