Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 228469 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#139489 Jul 7, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Joel played his normal role as instigator today. Today he took Alex under his wing. Last week it was skeptic. Normally it's Hugh, but Hugh has been elsewhere of late.
Stop ducking and diving Eric.
You insulted me as an Islamist.
That was not an innocent remark.
It was either a remark from an ignorant assole or a sinister zionist controller.
You then had the temerity to claim that you really knew many Muslims personally!
I know that you are lying. That is your trait.
Therefore, you are yet another sinister little zionist creep who infests these threads posing as an innocent Jew.
Your game is up.
So be off...otherwise all your ploys will be exposed.
SeasideSoon

Fortson, GA

#139490 Jul 7, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The Church sold Christianity under various packages. It fell under the well-known Christian marketing strategy. With the Panare, the Church became Panare.
For Panare, it was necessary to market the NT to a people, who were very kind and gentle. The only way was to make them feel guilty.
The Pinare were made to realize that some of their folks had killed an innocent European.
Yes, and I asked skeptic this same question at least 3 times, and what did I get?? A simple true answer would've sufficed.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#139491 Jul 7, 2012
@ HughBe

Greetings, my friend

Hope all is well with you. Have a nice weekend, dear HughBe.

Salaams
BMZ
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#139492 Jul 7, 2012
SeasideSoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, and I asked skeptic this same question at least 3 times, and what did I get?? A simple true answer would've sufficed.
You and I know that Skeptic is always unable to provide an answer. Was my answer satisfactory?

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#139493 Jul 7, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Go meaningless comedic diversion and trivialising serious issues!
You are a bigot because you never bothered to censure your partner in crime mr clueless eric for calling me an islamist.
Your sinister ploy of pretending to be neutral and fair has been exposed.
Joel has no sinister agenda to control USA to achieve his evil ends and then pretending as everything is a coincidence.
The disproportionate representation of Jews in every US seat of power has been carefully planned and executed while Christians have been sleeping.
If I am wrong give me the actual statistics to counter the claims.
Produce another Fed Resereve Chairman...Bernard Butler or Brian Brabbington instead of good old Ben AshkeNAZI Benanke.
Thanks
Here I would like to say something regarding words. I find it interesting for someone to get that upset as to derail a discussion and continue harping on the use of what could be construed as a derogatory word when in fact, the use of derogatory and curse words regarding another's religion is employed by so very many in their discussions and that without letup and without change, and then justified or excused by the users? Forgive me for interfering here, but this seems just a little off balance. Some people take umbrage at a variance of word usage, but use real big cannonballs to hurl at another's and will not stop. I figure I don't have to repeat what certain ones have said in their posts as if this eliminates all responsibility. To be fair, that is. And I have noticed that when I asked for accountablity regarding slamming words, not only do I get little response, but insistence that it is OK to use such epithets.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#139494 Jul 7, 2012
NotQuiter wrote:
<quoted text>
Here I would like to say something regarding words. I find it interesting for someone to get that upset as to derail a discussion and continue harping on the use of what could be construed as a derogatory word when in fact, the use of derogatory and curse words regarding another's religion is employed by so very many in their discussions and that without letup and without change, and then justified or excused by the users? Forgive me for interfering here, but this seems just a little off balance. Some people take umbrage at a variance of word usage, but use real big cannonballs to hurl at another's and will not stop. I figure I don't have to repeat what certain ones have said in their posts as if this eliminates all responsibility. To be fair, that is. And I have noticed that when I asked for accountablity regarding slamming words, not only do I get little response, but insistence that it is OK to use such epithets.
Thank you for your input NQ.
My response may seem disproportionate but I believe I am right on this occasion.
Eric is not as innocent as he would have us believe.
He deliberately tried to turn me into some fundamentalist by calling me Islamist.
I have clarified the defintion of Muslim and Islam and then he comes back with more insults and with deceitful claims about him knowing many Muslims personally as friends and work associates.
No decent person would insist on continuing to use such terms without retracting or apologising.
These chaps are not decent and all they want to do is to survive by making others fight with each other.
They have sinister agendas and they keep using these terms to brainwash others hoping "islamist" could be used willynilly on anybody!
Therefore, my full "wrath" shall be on him until he makes a full retraction with proper apology for lying about his non existent close Muslim friends or colleagues.
I give work to many good Jewish people and I have many for friends/associates.
People like Eric are not a patch on them.
I am sorry for causing any stir but Eric is not skeptic, garamba or paul and he needs to properly apologise!
Peace.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#139495 Jul 7, 2012
SeasideSoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, and I asked skeptic this same question at least 3 times, and what did I get?? A simple true answer would've sufficed.
Hello Seaside. I am sorry for not having replied to your post.
The matter is a bit complicated and quite controversial.

Those who control the powerful shall "control" the weak/less powerful.
USA is powerful.
Some sinister forces have wormed their way into powerful positions in USA to manipulate US wealth, power and mind set.
Many dangerous games are being played by some hardliners obsessed with self preservation at any cost, at the expense of US tax payers, thus forcing USA to spill blood of gentiles all over the world.
These sinister people are controlling USA through a well planned and well executed operation.
Any challenge is being trivialised as "conspiracy theorist"!
It is very clear that USA is being controlled by a select few who happen to be linked through a common objective of self preservation and promotion of a terror state in the middle east.
I do not wish to enter into any spiteful posts with decent people but I now believe that the two concerned here are not as innocent as they would have others believe.
Thanks.
Peace.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139496 Jul 7, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The Church sold Christianity under various packages. It fell under the well-known Christian marketing strategy. With the Panare, the Church became Panare.
For Panare, it was necessary to market the NT to a people, who were very kind and gentle. The only way was to make them feel guilty.
The Pinare were made to realize that some of their folks had killed an innocent European.
rabbee: never trust a decietfull person, attempting to call everyone innocent. since they are only running, for their own office. and you can't even trust a decietful guilty person, calling everyone else guilty too. since there is usually a great discrepancy beteen, what someone only says is true, and what really is true.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139497 Jul 7, 2012
it is easy to decern, the origional sin. by the subjects 'people' always avoid, and not the ones they don't avoid. and almost never avoid, discussing any new testament, quran, buddaism, mormanism, tanach, science, or whatever.

and those who are trying to establish their own religion, usually only discuss politics religiously in their own favor.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139498 Jul 7, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you tell me the names of the idiot and his son, who wrote the junk and stuff that you are posting?
I would strongly recommend that you read the Revelation Drug Store and try to keep away from the wrath, the violence and the vengeance of Jesus on his next visit.
We don't cherry-pick verses of Qur'aan.
This is how we read the section, which contains the verses you brought up.
<quoted text>
Translation by yours truly.
Get a magnifying glass and raed what I translated, ignorant fool!
You and your evangelist Liars, never quote the truth because the Truth has never set you free and shall never set you free.
Cherry-picking of verses is only applicable to the Christian BIble, which is full of incoherence and insertions by unknown idiot scribes, who added their own thoughts into the scripture.
rabbee: yeah but you still, can't answer the question. why is G-D, commanding that pagan muslems, christians, jews, agnostics, athiests, buddists, seventh day aventist, etc be persicuted? cause essencially, your all in the same evil new testament boat.

when it is nothing more, than your evil and wickedness against theirs. with not a righteous person, on earth to be seen. self-righteous yes, actually righteous no. with not one of you againites, to really tend to the garden here in TheTorah.

with more than six billion on earth, trying to give the illusion of innocense and honesty. with not one, innocent or honest person among you.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139499 Jul 7, 2012
Skeptic wrote:
Muslims will die in their sins.
Why did Jesus have to die for our sins?
Basically, the reason Jesus had to die for our sins was so that we could be forgiven and go to be with the Lord. Jesus is God in flesh (John 1:1,14; Col. 2:9) and only God can satisfy the Law requirements of a perfect life and perfect sacrifice that cleanses us of our sins.
All people have sinned against God. But, God is infinitely holy and righteous. He must punish the sinner, the Law- breaker. If He didn't, then His law is not Law for there is no law that is a law without a punishment.
The punishment for breaking the Law is death, separation from God. Therefore, we sinners need a way to escape the righteous judgment of God. Since we are stained by sin and cannot keep the Law of God, then the only one who could do what we cannot is God Himself.
That is why Jesus is God in flesh. He is both divine and human. He was made under the Law (Gal. 4:4) and He fulfilled it perfectly. Therefore, His sacrifice to God the Father on our behalf is of infinite value and is sufficient to cleanse all people from their sins and undo the offense to God.
rabbee: Benee Adam must die, because again their is nobody here in TheTorah. Adam died, because you all say, your not here in TheTorah with the subtle beasts. so G-D is going to give TheTorah again, because none of you! are here in IT thrice aaagain.

what are, you all stupid? as long as their is, nobody here in TheTorah. you give TheG-D of TheTorah, no other choice but to give it agains'es. with Benee Adam always having to die, and return as adam and his mate, to give rebirth to TheWhole Torah in TheHappening agains. so that to have any chance to have eternal life, you must be phusically born again here in TheTorah too. without all this, evil and wicked not here in IT ignorance.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139500 Jul 7, 2012
and if Benee Adam must always die, because none of you grandchildren and your grandmother are not here in TheTorah. then you are all, going to die too.

apparently the decision to give, TheWhole Torah again is already been made. since for more than three thousands years, there has been nobody here in IT. this is why adam and his mate are here thrice again. so your grandfather adam, is just waiting to see, if another mate is to be assigned or not. as to whether you all, go into oblivion or not.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139501 Jul 7, 2012
this whole world is not, a possible lame duck world. cause if your grandmother, gets replacced. then all you, shall never exist ever again.

the very last person in this world, you all don't want to help to decieve. is your grandmother of all of you, here in TheTorah.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139502 Jul 7, 2012
correction:

this whole world is, a possible lame duck world. cause if your grandmother, gets replacced. then all you, shall never exist ever again.

the very last person in this world, you all don't want to help to decieve. is your grandmother of all of you, here in TheTorah.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139503 Jul 7, 2012
and you can all call, Khaeen and Able, michael and joel all you want to thrice again. but i know the truth of where and who, they are again always here in TheTorah. and i am supprize you can even, get the name Able right, in scripture. even if you can't, actually get it right here in IT thrice again.

and if your grandmother, of all of you gets replaced. then Thank HaShem if i never have to speak to any of you as only critters again with the beast. even though i know, that won't solve the problem of you never being all here in TheTorah. it is just a matter of time, of any possible diminishing untrue returns.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139504 Jul 7, 2012
for thousands and thousands of third or fourth Torot times. the name of the grandmother of this world, has never been the ficticious mytholigical name eve. no matter how much you all, try to make this lie true to you.

for the last, two times and this time. her name is sarah faye ann carney, the same again vamp-irish girl. as more yehoodeem, have moved throughout this world. all losing their identity for the shame, the shame of not being here in TheTorah than you can possibly imagine.

and it is always the grandsons and grandaughters, of Avraham and Sarah that always gives birth to this whole world. so that your just another, dirty jew*, accusing other jews* with your own shamfull jewish* dirtiness.

so all you have on this planet, is alleged as jews* deceptively calling themseves anything else to avoid jewish* detection here in TheTorah. and calling yourselves, muslem, christian, buddist, chinese, american, french, agnostic, athiest, as an illusive cover story don't really change it.
Pepe

Cuajimalpa, Mexico

#139505 Jul 7, 2012
To Joel,

yoga for relaxation
&fe ature=related
JOEL PASTAKIA

Mumbai, India

#139506 Jul 7, 2012
A Jew by ancestry (to Judah) has no concept of loyalty to his country, other than Israel. He may have converted to Christianity but his loyalty will always remain with Eretz Yisrael. The life of goyim means nothing to their tribal god Yahweh.
SeasideSoon

Fortson, GA

#139508 Jul 7, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
You and I know that Skeptic is always unable to provide an answer. Was my answer satisfactory?
Well said. Here's more from The Missionaries: God Against the Indians

The first missionaries arrived in 1797 and developed a tailored sermon for the Tahitians, along the same theme as they used against the Panare in 1975.

However, after seven years, there were no conversions. Then a brilliant idea - they introduced the Tahitians to alcohol. Once the chief was dependent upon them for his alcohol, they offered to assist the tribe in a war against another tribe. Victory was assured since the missionaries had firearms. However, the agreement was contingent upon enforced conversion to Christianity.
As J.M.Osmond, one of the missionaries, wrote home "The whole nation was converted in a day.'

"There followed a reign of terror. Persistent unbelievers were put to death and a penal code was drawn up by the missionaries and enforced by the missionary police... It was declared illegal to adorn oneself with flowers, to sing(other than hymns), to tattoo the body, to surf or to dance. Minor offenders were put in the stocks, but what were seen as major infringements (dancing included) were punished by hard labour on the roads. Within a quarter of a century the process by which the native culture of Tahiti had been extinguished was exported to every corner of the South Pacific, reducing the islanders to the level of the working class in Victorian England."
---
Enter another missionary - Mr. Gyles, formerly a slave overseer in Jamaica, brought to Moorea to establish a sugar cane plantation utilizing the cheap labor such as he had in Jamaica.
---
"The enterprise failed, and Mr. Orsmond, believing that 'a too bountiful nature on Moorea dininishes men's natural desire to work', ordered all breadfruit trees to be cut down. By this time the population of Tahiti had been reduced by syphilis, smallpox and influenza from the 200,000 estimated by (Captain) Cook to 18,000. After 30 years of missionary rule, only 6,000 remained.

Otto Von Kotzebue, leader of a Russian expedition into the Pacific in 1823, long before the decline had reached its terminal phase, wrote:'A religion like this which forbids every innocent pleasure and cramps or annihilates every mental power is a libel on the divine founder of Christianity' The Tahitians, he said were by nature 'gentle, benevolent, open, gay, peaceful and wholly devoid of envy; they rejoiced in each other's good fortune, and when one received a present, all seemed to be equally gratified'. It grieved him that 'every pleasure should be punished as a sin among a people whom Nature destined to the most cheerful enjoyment'."
---

One of the missionaries wrote a history of the mission, but it was never published in full, as the missionary Society determined 'those facts which it would be advisable to expunge altogether'.

Then the goes into the hypocrisy and secret indulgences of the missionaries, and the manipulation for financial gain leading to great wealth for those who obtained flocks, herds, and plantations.

rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#139509 Jul 7, 2012
JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:
A Jew by ancestry (to Judah) has no concept of loyalty to his country, other than Israel. He may have converted to Christianity but his loyalty will always remain with Eretz Yisrael. The life of goyim means nothing to their tribal god Yahweh.
rabbee: liar! there are more than six billion of you from that ancestry, who are not loyal to Ysrael.

just what do you think, the word goyeem really means anyway? it is a world that is used, for those who mentally only reject being in TheLinage.

since adam and his mate, have always been the grandson and grandaughter of Avraham and Sarah. and it don't change no matter, how many other times G-D is to give this whole story again. so this time here in TheTorah again, has so far been no different than any of the other times.

and quite frankly i am tired, of always being returned at the end of wwii. always wwii because nobody ever believes in G-D, here in TheTorah when i finally arrive. with all of you, pretending your not here in TheOnly Story from TheG-D of TheTorah. when you have not even gotten, one good change here in TheTorah. since nobody is here in TheTorah, for a good change to happen.

what are you all, always stupid or what? G-D is not going to make any changes here in TheTorah, as long as you keep making all the same not here in TheTorah mental mistakes as before. you can't have peace on earth, if there is never anybody here in TheTorah for G-D to give it too. since you all errantly but truly judged yourselves, with your not being here in IT.

the way HaShem sees it, there ain't nobody but TheHisSon adam actually here in TheTorah today. just like the last two Torot times, this all happened with all of you and your grandmother. there is no random birth process going on here. with all of you, the very same people as the last two, Torot times. so you have all been, here in this same story twice before.

you all lost your whole soul twice before, with your origional sin, of never being here in TheTorah. so you have no memory, of being here previously before in TheTorah.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Religion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min guest 600,164
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 10 min La Quenelle de Di... 458,583
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 20 min Gary Coaldigger 20,705
News Bible joust at abuse hearing 34 min array 30
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 34 min Agents of Corruption 11,064
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 42 min NoMo 6,737
News What If Jesus Is not God? 1 hr Knowledge- 385
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 5 hr Eagle 12 245,183
More from around the web