We 'nuns on the bus' don't like Paul Ryan's idea of Catholic values | Simone Campbell

Sep 28, 2012 Full story: The Guardian 318

It has been inspirational to go on the road and meet people affected by Ryan's disturbing, supposedly 'Catholic' budget Sister Simone Campbell greets the crowd in Washington as part of the Nuns on the Bus campaign.

Full Story

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#285 Oct 10, 2012
bappie wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, right! I am so sure they're ready to line up with people who have done nothing but to demean and insult them. You don't know wtf you're talking about. You don't know anything about theology black or otherwise, you ignorant, copying and pasting fool. You can't even use your own words to express yourself, parrot!
You are of course trying to hold the plantation in tact........won't work....

R 49% O 44%, America has woke up.........will the MSM or sink further into the septic tank

Campaign tries to quell panic..........DC runs out of malox.....coke and valum through the roof

Dems frustrated by 'Big Bird' turn... Dems pray for hope........Obama gives them the bird.

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#286 Oct 11, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>You are of course trying to hold the plantation in tact........won't work....
R 49% O 44%, America has woke up.........will the MSM or sink further into the septic tank
Campaign tries to quell panic..........DC runs out of malox.....coke and valum through the roof
Dems frustrated by 'Big Bird' turn... Dems pray for hope........Obama gives them the bird.
And yet....

Obama - 323

Romeny - 206

Ties - 9

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

(Cue Mothra's tired oversampling link)

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#287 Oct 11, 2012
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet....
Obama - 323
Romeny - 206
Ties - 9
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
(Cue Mothra's tired oversampling link)
Old news cupcake....but you know that. Desperation.

Romney 330
Obama 208

Get used to it.

Poll: Romney edges Obama in Colo, narrows gap in Wisc...

Picks up 8 points in Calif...

Poll aggregator changes 5 states from 'leans Obama' to 'toss up'...

WI, MI, NH, PA, OH...

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#288 Oct 11, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Old news cupcake....but you know that. Desperation.
Romney 330
Obama 208
Get used to it.
Poll: Romney edges Obama in Colo, narrows gap in Wisc...
Picks up 8 points in Calif...
Poll aggregator changes 5 states from 'leans Obama' to 'toss up'...
WI, MI, NH, PA, OH...
Source? I posted mine, now post yours

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#289 Oct 11, 2012
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
Source? I posted mine, now post yours
News about Collorado professors predict Romney win
bing.com/news
• University of Colorado Professors Continue to Predict a Romney Win
YAHOO!•5 days ago With one debate down and a month to go before the election, two University of Colorado professors are continuing to predict that Republican candidate Mitt Romney will become President Romney this year.* According to…
• Electoral College Model Predicts Romney Will Win Even Bigger Than Previously Thought in 2012
TheBlaze.com •3 days ago
• University of Colorado prediction model predicts Romney win
Examiner•2 days ago

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#290 Oct 11, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>News about Collorado professors predict Romney win
bing.com/news
• University of Colorado Professors Continue to Predict a Romney Win
YAHOO!•5 days ago With one debate down and a month to go before the election, two University of Colorado professors are continuing to predict that Republican candidate Mitt Romney will become President Romney this year.* According to…
• Electoral College Model Predicts Romney Will Win Even Bigger Than Previously Thought in 2012
TheBlaze.com •3 days ago
• University of Colorado prediction model predicts Romney win
Examiner•2 days ago
Bing, Yahoo,The Blaze and The Examiner?....Really those are your sources? Those are almost as pathetic as you eHow link. Ever think about going some place credible? Maybe? Just once? Hell why don't you cite The National Enquirer, The Globe, or The Star.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#291 Oct 11, 2012
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
Bing, Yahoo,The Blaze and The Examiner?....Really those are your sources? Those are almost as pathetic as you eHow link. Ever think about going some place credible? Maybe? Just once? Hell why don't you cite The National Enquirer, The Globe, or The Star.
See that's why I seldom take time to link.....No cupcake your diversion won't work anymore than your gaggle of goofballs you post with. That information came from the source, the men that do the poll.........sorry your little ploy is childish and very liberal of you.

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#292 Oct 11, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>See that's why I seldom take time to link.....No cupcake your diversion won't work anymore than your gaggle of goofballs you post with. That information came from the source, the men that do the poll.........sorry your little ploy is childish and very liberal of you.
I can understand why sugarlumps, with sources like those I'd be ashamed of linking to them as well.

Your sources are crap and very indicative of your mind set. I'm sorry you can't handle being called out on them. Why not cite Wikipedia while your at it.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#293 Oct 12, 2012
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
I can understand why sugarlumps, with sources like those I'd be ashamed of linking to them as well.
Your sources are crap and very indicative of your mind set. I'm sorry you can't handle being called out on them. Why not cite Wikipedia while your at it.
Instead of more hate mail, maybe you can prove your listed reference.........waiting

REALCLEAR MAP SHOWS SHIFT...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#294 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
REALCLEAR MAP SHOWS SHIFT...
WAHHHHH!

Electoral college = 290 Obama. 270 needed to win.

PS: Rasmussen doesn't get to vote!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#295 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>News about Collorado professors predict Romney win
Gosh... the Blaze predicting a GOP win!

who would have ever thought.... COUGH

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#296 Oct 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHH!
Electoral college = 290 Obama. 270 needed to win.
PS: Rasmussen doesn't get to vote!
CAMPAIGN FREAKOUT!
OBAMA LOCK UNDER 10 STATES

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#297 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Instead of more hate mail, maybe you can prove your listed reference.........waiting
REALCLEAR MAP SHOWS SHIFT...
The electoral vote site that I mention is a conglomeration of all the polls taken everywhere, there is no bias in them they range from PPP to your beloved Rasmussen.

And as of October 12:

Obama - 294

Romney - 235

Tie - 9

Is Romney catching up, yes. Is it over, not by a long shot; there are 2 more Presidential debates and one more VP debate and anything could happen between now and then.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2012/Pres/Ma...

But I can tell you one thing if Romney should become President, he better not take one day of vacation, play one round of golf or read one word off a teleprompter. And he better fix the economy within the first 100 days of his Presidency...much like you and your ilk wanted President Obama to do...Sauce for the goose.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#299 Oct 12, 2012
FLASH: TV RATINGS FOR VP DEBATE DOWN SHARPLY... DEVELOPING...

FOXNEWS 10,019,827
CBS 8,308,421
ABC 8,287,610
NBC 7,851,757
MSNBC 4,378,671
CNN 4,145,951

**69.9 MILLION WATCHED IN 2008...

Proving of course that what few were left undecided, are now decided especially after the first two debates. Watch for more movement to Romney especially with the women vote. Obama now only a lock in 9 states. Jimmy Carter II is being replayed.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#300 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
FLASH: TV RATINGS FOR VP DEBATE DOWN SHARPLY... DEVELOPING...
Gosh... let's see... Biden was in both and the only thing that changed was Ryan?

Thinking Americans would say they didn't really care about what Ryan had to say.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#301 Oct 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh... let's see... Biden was in both and the only thing that changed was Ryan?
Thinking Americans would say they didn't really care about what Ryan had to say.
You could tell their was bias with her cutting off Ryan 31 times and letting Biden interrupt 82 times......it was almost as if it were ..........rehearsed. Biden was too ready for the questions and the question were kept to liberal talking points and Joe's few strengths. We can expect no less from Candy, which is probably barefoot, they think alike and are about the same size. Obama has probably had the questions for a week. They don't care about how bias it looks, they are trying to get their cooked goose out of the oven before the timer goes off.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#302 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>You could tell their was bias with her cutting off Ryan 31 times.
Interruptions during a debate, ScrotumSniffer?

STOP THE PRESSES!

Well, at least Ryan won't have to get his clocked cleaned by November, it's been done.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#303 Oct 12, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Interruptions during a debate, ScrotumSniffer?
STOP THE PRESSES!
Well, at least Ryan won't have to get his clocked cleaned by November, it's been done.
Good question easy answer, after Obama's epic record breaking failure to engage his magnificent brain for his first debate, no further attention was needed. Peoples minds were made up.

The polls show it and are basically all trending to Romney. Thanks for asking.

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#304 Oct 12, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Good question easy answer, after Obama's epic record breaking failure to engage his magnificent brain for his first debate, no further attention was needed. Peoples minds were made up.
The polls show it and are basically all trending to Romney. Thanks for asking.
Funny how NOW polls mean something and it's all over..why is that? Because your guy is in the lead? What happens if and when Obama takes it back? Are the polls then suddenly and magically going to become democratically oversampled?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#305 Oct 12, 2012
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how NOW polls mean something and it's all over..why is that?
Funny how that is: the polls mean something when draft dodger is in front and only those polls that have him out front.

The exact same polls didn't count a week ago.

Funny how that is.

If only the polls counted as votes, eh?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Religion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Islam for peace, or violence? 5 min JIN 36
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 15 min Thinking 22,989
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min truth 548,705
LDS Apostle visited Tonga (Feb '14) 26 min No Surprise 18,884
Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 41 min danetoo 378,043
No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (... (Jan '11) 55 min Paki_Jatt_Soorma 51,254
Does Being 'Spiritual But Not Religious' Really... 58 min Thinking 2

Religion People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE