This is where you prove you're so good with your whacko replys that had absolutely not a thing to do with your previous statement I asked you to give proof of.<quoted text>
You're such an ignorant fool. The law required stoning if a married woman is caught committing adultery. That is having sex with a woman who is already married. If you can't have sex with her, you sure as hell can't marry her you moron.
A widow is no longer married dumb fool.
You're swallow anything to protect the perverts called LDS leaders, won't you?
"It was clearly against the Ten Commandments for a man to marry a woman who was already married."
I asked you to show me where in the ten commandments God commanded a man not to marry a woman that was already married.
And you didn't show that commandment. Instead you get all windy and go off on some tangent that had nothing to do with your initial statement. And you have did this many many times. And I have called you on it when you have done it.
What did you do? what you just did. Instead of stating, "Okay, it's not a commandment" or something to that effect, you go off talkng about other topics.