No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54754 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

Dak-Original

Milton Keynes, UK

#37952 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you do not know Arabic, and all these books are in Arabic?
So you have not read these books, but their English Translations.
And who did the translations? What tricks they played in those Translations?
When you want to lay any allegation, you should have proofs. You are wrong because your "CONCLUSIONS" are exactly opposite to what these Islamic scholars reached.
None of them "Turned their backs on Islam" as you did by reading their books!!
So the "kink" is in you and not them and the main source is that your foundation was not strong.
That is why I want to know about your childhood and how your parents brought you up?
Did they also turned their back on Islam and became Non Muslims or you "did that honor and did your parents and family this honor"?
Open up and tell me more about your early life, may be we can straighten up this kink. If Allah Wills of course.
T%his thing about all translators of Islamic writers have had agenda is a slur bit too hard to digest. Yes,things can be misinterpreted by a translator and if that is pointed out the publishers are to happy to review in free countries. Yes, nuance of poetry can be lost , especially only the best ones would have been hired to write religious matters. But then to allege that translations are wrong without attempting to spend time to corret it is very "Muckesque" mischief. So, MUQ thinks that Mahmood was not brainwashed enough to keep him the fold?!!
I believe the real GOD will not forgive MUQ!
Dak-Original

Milton Keynes, UK

#37953 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum,(THE SEALED NECTAR, Biography of the Noble Prophet [pbuh], by SAFI UL RAHMAN al-Mubarakpuri
Jamia Salafia - India Translated by Issam Diab Maktaba Dar-us-Salam Publishers and Distributors, Part- 69
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/SM_t...
The Battle of Uhud (Contd.)
Burial of the Martyrs
The Messenger of Allah [pbuh] supervised the martyrs’ burial and said: "I bear witness that anyone who is wounded in the way of Allah, Allah will resurrect him with his wound bleeding a liquid which is blood-like in colour but musk-like in scent." [Ibn Hisham 2/98]
Some of the Companions carried their men killed in the war to Madinah, but the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] ordered that they should be sent back in order to be buried where they were killed. He ordered that they should not be washed but buried as they were after stripping them off their armours and leather clothes. He used to bury every two or three martyrs together in one grave and even join two men in one garment while saying:
"Who is the more learned of the Quran?" and he would commit him to earth first. He would say: "I bear witness to those on the Day of Resurrection." He buried both ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amr bin Haram and ‘Amr bin Al-Jamuh in one grave due to the affection they used to possess to each other.[Za'd Al-Ma'ad 2/98; Sahih Al-Bukhari 2/584]
When the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] saw how his uncle and foster brother, Hamzah, was mutilated, he was extremely grieved. When his aunt Safiyah came to see her brother Hamzah, the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] ordered her son Az-Zubair to dismiss her in order not to see what happened to her brother.
She refused and said, "But why should I go away. I have been informed that they have mutilated him. But so long as it is in the way of Allah, whatever happens to him satisfies us. I say: Allah is Sufficient and I will be patient if Allah wills." She approached, looked at him and supplicated Allah for him and said: "To Allah we all belong and to Him we will verily return." and she implored Allah to forgive him. Then the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] ordered that he should be buried with ‘Abdullah bin Jahsh — who was his nephew as well as his foster brother…
After committing all the martyrs to earth, and after offering praise and supplication to Allah, the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] went back to Madinah….
In the evening of that day — i.e. Saturday, the seventh of Shawwal, 3rd year A.H.— the Messenger arrived in Madinah. As soon as he reached his house, he handed his sword to his daughter Fatimah and said: "O daughter, wash the blood off this sword. By Allah it has been helpful to me today."
‘Ali bin Abi Talib handed her his sword and said: "And wash the blood of this sword too. By Allah, it has been helpful to me today." So the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] said: "Sahl bin Haneef and Abu Dujana have been as courageous as you are in the fight." [Ibn Hisham 2/100]
Most of the narrations confirmed that seventy Muslims were killed and most of them, sixty-five, Helpers; forty-one of whom were from Khazraj and twenty-four from Aws. This, besides one Jew and four Emigrants.
As for the polytheists, twenty-two of them were killed, but some versions speak of thirty-seven; after all, Allah knows best.[Ibn Hisham 2/122-129; Fath Al-Bari 7/351]
(Abridged
Contd.)
Here he goes again! MUQ knows but still carries on! LOL!

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#37954 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
In fact "No book written in one language can be properly translated in another language"
You can convey the thoughts but not the beauty, the lyrics and the sweetness of original composition in the translation. It is almost impossible.
The same is with Quran, we can translate it into another language to know some of its meanings, but no translation can take the place of Original Quran.
Translations are not to be recited in daily prayers, they are learning aids and not the scriptures.
Translations are done by humans, they go out of touch and they get old fashioned , But Quran stays pure and fine, untouched , revelation from All Mighty Allah.
The Quran was designed not to have punctuation as to accommodate Arabs who only knew verse through poems.
Dak-Original

Milton Keynes, UK

#37955 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
How could I make such a big claim?
I have always stated that I am but a student and novice. But we as a Muslims are told to share what knowledge we have about Islam, even if it is a little bit.
What I write is not my own findings, but which Scholars before me have written. I translate them into English and present on these threads.
Somehow I find that even a "novice" like me knows "more" than the people who pose as "experts" and make claim that they know "all"!!
There is a saying in Hindi "ANDHON MEIN KANA RAJA"!!
Can we trust this jihadist to the boot MUQ to translate anything from Arabic into English? OH! MUQ!

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#37956 Feb 19, 2013
Dear Friends & foes,
One of the statement, based on his vast observation and intellect, of Winston Churchill is noteworthy in present context. Doing research on Muslim societies he described it at the end of the 19th century: the most retrograde force in the world ! Mathematically it means degeneration of a society is directly proportional to the percentage of Muslims in that society.

Today we find MUQ likes claiming again that God’s language is Arabic, and dragging Arabs and Muslims to one step closer to complete degeneration.
Do one need to be an expert to find out how fraud he is ? Nope…….

In Judaism Hebrew is the God’s language. If Muslims call themselves part of Judaism, if Muslims call Abraham and Moses as their prophet also how can they claim only Arabic is God’s language ? Does it mean that Moses was a fraud who showed ten commandments carved by God on stone slabs (in Hebrew (or Aramaic?)) in His own language ? But carved on stone a language seems more authentic then 2nd hand whispering in ear, isn’t it? Zakir and MUQ may say Gibril and God spoke different languages, well then whole revelation becomes lost in translation !

Then in Vedic religion, "speech" Vac, i.e. the language of liturgy, now known as Vedic Sanskrit, was considered the language of the gods. But Hindoos have evolved and don’t fight over it, knowing the facts.

What are the facts?

The formal study of language began in India with Panini, the 50th century BC grammarian who formulated 3,959 rules of Sanskrit morphology. Panini’s systematic classification of the sounds of Sanskrit into consonants and vowels, and word classes, such as nouns and verbs, was the first known instance of its kind. The language evolved too and today google ‘most scientific language’ and you will know the difference (Chaddi- ur phokat source also say the same) it made in science.

But I don’t say it’s God’s language………..

Then in the Middle East Sibawayh made a detailed description of Arabic in 9th century AD in his monumental work, Al-kitab fi al-nahw (The Book on Grammar), as first attempt to establish Arabic as a language. I mean, during Mohammad’s time Arabic was not a language only…….they probably yelled at each other in mixture of Aramaic and animal sound………..later part like Tarzan!

Then MUQ’s belief that God wrote Quran in his backyard yesterday after Arab league established what is ‘Classical Arabic’ few decades back is just a glimpse of retrogression and rot and fraud in Islamic society .

Yes friends and foes Islam is the most retrograde force in the world ! Mathematically it means degeneration of a society is directly proportional to the percentage of Muslims in that society. MUQ and Chaddi are just sample s and proof of that rot.

For this MUQ (or Chaddi) need not have to ask for proof, and I need not be an expert – He just has to stand before mirror and ask for proof to his own impression in support of his doctrine !!!!

To know that his doctrine is fraudulent he need not be an expert either !
Luv
HK
Dabang

Kolkata, India

#37958 Feb 19, 2013
Why you people insult IMI ? He belongs to a different class. Though he lives in slum of dirty muslim colony in Delhi yet he dreams about the White House.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#37959 Feb 19, 2013
HAJI KAJI wrote:
Dear Friends & foes,
One of the statement, based on his vast observation and intellect, of Winston Churchill is noteworthy in present context. Doing research on Muslim societies he described it at the end of the 19th century: the most retrograde force in the world ! Mathematically it means degeneration of a society is directly proportional to the percentage of Muslims in that society.
Today we find MUQ likes claiming again that God’s language is Arabic, and dragging Arabs and Muslims to one step closer to complete degeneration.
Do one need to be an expert to find out how fraud he is ? Nope…….
In Judaism Hebrew is the God’s language. If Muslims call themselves part of Judaism, if Muslims call Abraham and Moses as their prophet also how can they claim only Arabic is God’s language ? Does it mean that Moses was a fraud who showed ten commandments carved by God on stone slabs (in Hebrew (or Aramaic?)) in His own language ? But carved on stone a language seems more authentic then 2nd hand whispering in ear, isn’t it? Zakir and MUQ may say Gibril and God spoke different languages, well then whole revelation becomes lost in translation !
Then in Vedic religion, "speech" Vac, i.e. the language of liturgy, now known as Vedic Sanskrit, was considered the language of the gods. But Hindoos have evolved and don’t fight over it, knowing the facts.
What are the facts?
The formal study of language began in India with Panini, the 50th century BC grammarian who formulated 3,959 rules of Sanskrit morphology. Panini’s systematic classification of the sounds of Sanskrit into consonants and vowels, and word classes, such as nouns and verbs, was the first known instance of its kind. The language evolved too and today google ‘most scientific language’ and you will know the difference (Chaddi- ur phokat source also say the same) it made in science.
But I don’t say it’s God’s language………..
Then in the Middle East Sibawayh made a detailed description of Arabic in 9th century AD in his monumental work, Al-kitab fi al-nahw (The Book on Grammar), as first attempt to establish Arabic as a language. I mean, during Mohammad’s time Arabic was not a language only…….they probably yelled at each other in mixture of Aramaic and animal sound………..later part like Tarzan!
Then MUQ’s belief that God wrote Quran in his backyard yesterday after Arab league established what is ‘Classical Arabic’ few decades back is just a glimpse of retrogression and rot and fraud in Islamic society .
Yes friends and foes Islam is the most retrograde force in the world ! Mathematically it means degeneration of a society is directly proportional to the percentage of Muslims in that society. MUQ and Chaddi are just sample s and proof of that rot.
For this MUQ (or Chaddi) need not have to ask for proof, and I need not be an expert – He just has to stand before mirror and ask for proof to his own impression in support of his doctrine !!!!
To know that his doctrine is fraudulent he need not be an expert either !
Luv
HK
Enriching
Qadir mengal

Islamabad, Pakistan

#37962 Feb 19, 2013
Qadir mengal wrote:
who="Jinn Martini"]
If someone makes the wrong decision, why would Allah lead him down that road to assure he will continually make the wrong decision rather than guide and encourage the person to get on the right road? If the person makes a wrong decision, why does Allah need to make sure they continue with the wrong decision?

Mengal
Dear Jinn Martini,
Who ever makes wrong decision, Allah shows him right path through His messengers ,Books, And through His other good servants until he becomes aware of it, After awareness and knowledge of the same if any one rejects it and chose different way ,make efforts for that way, than Allah leaves him to go on that way because if Allah on his own power stop him or forced him to go on certain way than question of test loose its importance so as once going in Hell or Paradise on his own decsion and effort becomes un meaning full. As Quran says
THIS WORLD IS TEST AND TOIL.
Quran-LXVII—
2-He Who created Death
And Life, that He
May try which of you
Is best in deed:
And He is the Exalted
In Might, Oft-Forgiving.-
According to Quran man has been sent to earth for toil and test. The rules of creator for every body are equal and same. Quran further clears this position that the men only get that, for which he make effort and hard work.
Qadir mengal

Islamabad, Pakistan

#37963 Feb 19, 2013
JESUS /JEWS/QURAN

In deed the Moses was prophet and was way to God at his time. So as Jesus was prophet and way to God at his time or period. The both messenger of Allah Almighty were own self were Jews and send for only Israelites or Jews for that period. Prophet Mohammad (saw) is seal of Messengers and is final apostle of Allah and was sent for whole man kind. Amazingly Christians took Jesus as God and claimed trinity a word which itself is strange for bible in all books of bible there is no any unequivocal or clear word in which Jesus himself has claimed as God are he asked to followers to worship him as God. This was the fact that seventy two (72) eminent Scholars of different sects of Christianity took out the world trinity and throw it out from bible as in revised standard published bible saying that word trinity is interpolation and concoction in bible.

Lo! In this regard a dialog with Dr. Zakir Naike on Peace T.V could be best material on this subject No doubt Jesus is favorite Prophet of Muslims as Quran speak about Jesus and trinity.

Surrah IV verse 171:-

“O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: or say of Allah aught but truth. Christ Jesus the sun of marry was (no more than) an apostle of Allah and his word, Which He bestowed on marry, and a sprit proceeding from Him: So believe in Allah and his apostles say not ' trinity' desist it will be better for you: for Allah is One Allah: Glory be to Him (for Exalted is he) above having a son. To him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as disposers of affairs”.

However, if any Christian having any doubt about the Prophet Hood of Jesus I invite him in his own benefit to watch Peace TV and listen Dr. Zakar Nike on the topic about the major religions. Similarities between Islam and Christianity. Is Jesus crucified or otherwise?
Qadir mengal

Islamabad, Pakistan

#37964 Feb 19, 2013
who="Jinn Martini"]
Qadir, you didn't answer this question. Maybe you didn't see it. Are you saying that
Allah tests which is best of us so that he can know who deserves heaven and who doesn't? And if not, then why does he test us? Isn't the only reason for anybody or anyone to test anything because they want to see how the results go?

Mengal

Dear "Jinn Martini"
Your query that,
(Allah tests which is best of us so that he can know who deserves heaven and who doesn't?Allah tests which is best of us so that he can know who deserves heaven and who doesn't? And if not, then why does he test us? Isn't the only reason for anybody or anyone to test anything because they want to see how the results go?
)

Answer is no,absolutely not,
----------
But according to my little knowledge about teachings of Islam, You are the choice and best creation of Allah, He also made you His
vicegerent, gave you knowledge from his own knowledge to rule over this world.And His mercy does not finish this world, He after death also in his eternal wisdom again instead of any other creation chosen to send you in that world (called Hereafter). For success in that world, only one condition set-out that is too is in your reach, either to do good and take Higher reward "Paradise" or do bad and go in "Hellfire", this what is in your own hand,So Passing of this test is in your hand,However Allah Through His own Messengers and through books well inform you and bring this fact in your knowledge that you tomorrow may not say that he had no knowledge of reward(paradise) or Hellfire or was not aware that what were rules and conditions to pass this exam or test?
Qadir mengal

Islamabad, Pakistan

#37965 Feb 19, 2013
Those who interested in life of Mohammad as a prophet or other wise come and visit the thread” Qadir mengal Miss understanding islam”An important series about the life of Mohammad(saw) has started, from page 33 of topix this series will go number wise just as 1 (2) 3 … along with mentioning the thread number where the series is located. So as Qadir mengal also (insha Allah) will give you the answers about your questions and Queries about islam on this thread if you questioned him about islam.
Note-Post no, 1,2,3,4,5,6,of this series have come on page 33 of Miss understanding islam, while post number 7,8,9,9-a,and10,11,to 18 have appeared on page no, 34 of this thread i,e miss understanding islam so as post no 19 and 20 and others have appeared on page 35 of this thread kindly follow a head.
Dabang

Kolkata, India

#37966 Feb 19, 2013
IMI apne aath bhai bahno ke sath jama masjid ke paas ek gande muslim muhalle me rehta hai. Din me pacho waqt topiix pe post karta hai lekin namaj nahi padhta hai. Ghar me sirf do kamre hai ek me ammi aur abbu uske ek aur bhai ya bahan ko lane ke intjam kar rahe hai aur dusre kamre me ye apne aath bhai bahan aur ek purane computer ke saath baitha bakchodi karta hai. Iska baap fal bechta hai aur chacha MUQ saudi arab me rahta hai. Do bhai mutton ki dukan chalate hai aur do madarse me jihadi banne ki training le rahe hai. Ek bahan mamu jaan se aur ek chach jaan ke bete se ishq lada rahi hai
Historian

Croydon, UK

#37967 Feb 19, 2013
Qadir mengal wrote:
Those who interested in life of Mohammad as a prophet or other wise come and visit the thread” Qadir mengal Miss understanding islam”An important series about the life of Mohammad(saw) has started, from page 33 of topix this series will go number wise just as 1 (2) 3 … along with mentioning the thread number where the series is located. So as Qadir mengal also (insha Allah) will give you the answers about your questions and Queries about islam on this thread if you questioned him about islam.
Note-Post no, 1,2,3,4,5,6,of this series have come on page 33 of Miss understanding islam, while post number 7,8,9,9-a,and10,11,to 18 have appeared on page no, 34 of this thread i,e miss understanding islam so as post no 19 and 20 and others have appeared on page 35 of this thread kindly follow a head.
Those who are interested should also view this great documentary, Islam The Untold Story:

Mahmood

Toronto, Canada

#37968 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you do not know Arabic, and all these books are in Arabic?
So you have not read these books, but their English Translations.
And who did the translations? What tricks they played in those Translations?
When you want to lay any allegation, you should have proofs. You are wrong because your "CONCLUSIONS" are exactly opposite to what these Islamic scholars reached.
None of them "Turned their backs on Islam" as you did by reading their books!!
So the "kink" is in you and not them and the main source is that your foundation was not strong.
That is why I want to know about your childhood and how your parents brought you up?
Did they also turned their back on Islam and became Non Muslims or you "did that honor and did your parents and family this honor"?
Open up and tell me more about your early life, may be we can straighten up this kink. If Allah Wills of course.
My parents brought me up as a shia muslim. I turned my back on Islam around 10 years ago. Both my parents died as muslims and buried the Islamic way.

I am not interested in this childish kink thing, maybe I have a kink, allah knows best. I promise you, that I will revert to Islam as soon as you can provide irrefutable evidence that Islam comes to us from a higher power.

This translation issue that you have now brought up, is a lame excuse and does need to be discussed any furhter. Most scholars who have written bios about Mohammad were all very well versed in Arabic.

Maulana Sahib, have you not relaize that you have not answered even one of my questions?

Since: Nov 10

United States

#37969 Feb 19, 2013
Chump Change wrote:
<quoted text>
Did your western education, mannerisms and teach you to think read and write filth in Hindi or was this due to to your ghatia filthy family upbringing?
ROFL!!
Western or Desi education is immaterial when one gets down to talking to dogs, you have to bark at them to intimidate them as they only respect the entity that barks at them louder than they can. Haraamkhor, teri English ka satyanash ho gya na? Badda ghamand tha na tujhe? Thesaurus gai tail lene yaha toe tu badda deadly trike se fansa tha. AN EUNUCH ? LMAO !!!!!!

Since: Nov 10

United States

#37970 Feb 19, 2013
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
My parents brought me up as a shia muslim. I turned my back on Islam around 10 years ago. Both my parents died as muslims and buried the Islamic way.
I am not interested in this childish kink thing, maybe I have a kink, allah knows best. I promise you, that I will revert to Islam as soon as you can provide irrefutable evidence that Islam comes to us from a higher power.
This translation issue that you have now brought up, is a lame excuse and does need to be discussed any furhter. Most scholars who have written bios about Mohammad were all very well versed in Arabic.
Maulana Sahib, have you not relaize that you have not answered even one of my questions?
Harami, since you have left Islam then what the fuk are you doing here? On a Pakistani forum and that too on a thread titled on our Paigambar?

Hindu bastard, if the aversion from Islam has made you leave the membership then get as far away as possible and don't you show us your high ground that you are no more our member as you feel different.

The fact is that incomplete guys like you cannot become Muslims as your penis is 3 cms long when erected. Islam membership is for the guys who have the potential to reach minimum of 20cms so that thodda daan kiya ja sake sunnat styled and with the rest of the Lund, we gratify Hindu women. India Today sexual survey confirmed that 8 out of 10 Hindu women have physically or mentally copulated with a Muslim with chiseled lund.

Ask your mom and sissy. islamic lund is all about domination. Now fcuk off and ja ke apni ma ke ooper chaddar daal ---riksha wala chod ke chala gya hei ab tange walla ayega.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#37971 Feb 19, 2013
http://dawn.com/2013/02/19/coexistence-with-i...

This article is from DAWN..the paper MOHAMMED ALI JINNAH founded...

Nothing,absolutely nothing,can explain the relationship between Muslim rulers and Hindu subjects as well as this article!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#37972 Feb 19, 2013
http://dawn.com/2013/02/19/coexistence-with-i...

DO NOT miss reading this article..some semblance of sanity is returning to Muslim thinking...takes a lot of bombs killings and casualties but some how somewhere SENSE PREVAILS!!!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#37973 Feb 19, 2013
All medieval conquerors were basically predators; they lived at the cost of the people they conquered, appropriating their resources, which naturally antagonised the subject people. Muslim rulers, after the first four caliphs, used the Islamic doctrine of Zimmitude generally to their worldly benefit.

Rulers can win their subjects’ respect, even their affection, with their wisdom and justice. After many atrocities and crimes against their Indian subjects the British were able to leave India as almost friends, and no hostility exists today between them and their former subjects because their leaders and people confessed their crimes; they agreed to leave; and they left many gifts of value like modern learning, religious tolerance, systems of governance, constitutional democracy, science and technology.

Unfortunately, unlike the colonial capitalists of Europe, our ancestors had very few benefits to offer to their Zimmis in India which could endear them to their subjects. Added to it was the religious pride of our ulema that believed in the supremacy of Islam and flaunted it without a semblance of courtesy or hesitation. This only antagonised the subject people ever more deeply and necessitated perpetual use of force to maintain Muslim rule. In order to nourish the fighting spirit of the soldiers and common Muslims, ever more pride of faith and ever deeper contempt for reason was injected into their psyche through the ulema and clergy. The principle of equal human treatment of the Muslims and non-Muslims remained alien to their rule.

The absence of positive performance was compensated with boastful pride of the ability to destroy. That is perhaps an inherited attitude when our orators in Pakistan proudly talk of what we destroyed: our ancestors destroyed Indian idols and kings followed by the recent smashing of the peaceful Buddha; recently we destroyed the Soviet Union, we have pushed America to disaster, we shall destroy India, Europe and every system of “Jahiliah”, including our own systems and people in Pakistan and Afghanistan. This mindset hardly ever asks: what did we create or build?

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#37974 Feb 19, 2013
We, as a nation, have gradually lost all respect for science and scientists; we have substituted research with conspiracy theories; we boast of our nuclear build-up, which is again an ability to destroy, not defend, an ability stolen from heretics without learning the science that creates it. This shortcut mentality, to escape science and invention, is an expression of our lazy, self-righteous pretensions. To bury the guilt, our power hungry ulema expects us to admire a scientist, a nuclear opportunist who admires the Taliban, and hate the real scientists of the world as heretics.

It is, therefore, natural for our people with this mindset to support the monster when it destroys Pakistan and the world with the banner of Islam in its hand. Self-righteousness is the dismissal of humility; it jams our ability to objectively appreciate merit, so that the virtue and merit of others never attracts our attention. Bragging of our own virtue and merit grows louder as our record of performance dips. This dichotomy of practice and pretension paralyses judgment and kills the resolve to make amends.

Ever since Independence, our governments and army leaders propagated the easy excuse that India aspires to annex Pakistan to realise an ancient Hindu dream of “Greater India”. But was this view realistic? Is it an exclusively Hindu dream? The fact is: Muslim rulers and the ulema also desired Greater India. They had endeavored hard for centuries to rule the whole of India; many times in these seven centuries they tried to hold Afghanistan with one hand while holding Bengal with the other. Ever since 1947, our generals and leaders have tried to grab Afghanistan and hold Bengal by force. Our lions and eagles still dream to destroy Bharat and make it a Muslim colony again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Religion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sanders: Don't blame Islam for Orlando shooting 4 min Ismail 597
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min Steve III 646,472
News Religion, higher education and critical thinking (Aug '15) 22 min 15th Dalai Lama 8,235
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 28 min Faith Michigan 489,419
News 'Remain Loyal!' theme of Jehovah's Witnesses co... 36 min Brother P 220
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 45 min renee 34,618
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr Uncle Sam 14,891
More from around the web