No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54734 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#37029 Feb 7, 2013
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem begins when people attribute organized religion to some higher power without any evidence to back their claim.
..Do you really wish for a Moses to come back and unleash his 7 deadly plagues ...???...I don't think, we would really enjoy that kind of evidence, to back their claims ...
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#37030 Feb 7, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Common, chuy! Mahmood's head is firmly fixed and he has states the crux of the problem that afflicts the followers of the faith of his birth. There are many like him in muslim nations but they dare not utter a word.
...I won't say his head is firmly fixed ...he went from Islam to Atheism ...(fear of God ,to despisement of God)...

So, He claims there is no freedom of conscience in Islam ...big whup ..the, same is true in China and North Korea ..
Dabang

Ashburn, VA

#37031 Feb 7, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Regarding Shakespeare: You know MORE about him than he knew about himself!! He never made the claim that he was incomparable.
And what did Shakespeare achieved really? What they gave to the world? And who says that his works are unmatchable? the same can be said about any Poet and Dramatists of any literature.
That Quran has taken control of whole society, that it is memorized from cover to cover by millions who do not even know a word of Arabic.....can any human work do it?
2. As regards Al Marry's Quran, bring it, let us see what he wrote something that "improved" chapter 112 of Quran
You are just wasting your' and every one else' time on this thread.
I had hoped that you must have composed something....but you are still beating around the bush.
May be that is the "job" and "Fate" of "so called" experts!!
Maulana Sahib, any book in this world is better than your Quran that is causing a lot of violence everywhere in the world.

Read 'I am OK You're OK' of Thomas A Harris. This book is not on religion, but it can be more helpful than Quran, in becoming a good person.

Please interpret sura 9:5 of your great book for our understanding.

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#37032 Feb 7, 2013
If Rana Pratap and Prithiviraj Ji are Myths then who the fck Katuus were fighting with and Kattu historians wrote volumes on it ? Ooooops….d’ya mean Ghori shori all are myths ? Are you confirming Afghan Kattus are chutiya…who stab on Prithiviraj’s grave to take revenge on his killing of Ghori Gandoo ?

Possible….may be all these Kattus never came to India, just played a play in their chutiya country stadium and commentator wrote down the play as history !!! Brilliant….so you agree Muslims never ruled over India ? It’s just a fiction play !

Possible . You see there is a Muslim history which says Hamza (Mohammad’s henchman) came to eastern India and made Rohinga Muslims ! Even Babur laughed at it saying – it is a comedy play, Muslim way !

Thanks for seconding my thoughts…..

BTW teri ammi abhi bhi Gurvinder Driver ke sath time break leti haey, Ya Gurvinder Ji chodtey chodtey VD sE allah kou pyarey hou gaey ?
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
while your Rana Pratap (myth), Prithvi Raj chauhan (another myth) and other folkloric heroes may not have any monuments beside some imaginary drawings but Alamgir Abul Muzaffar Muhi u'd-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb still occupies a historical resting place in India in ( Khuldabad) Aurangabad in Maharashtra. It is believed that due to this tomb of the most honest and decent man in Maharashtra, this state is blessed and has the largest GDP of about 200 Billion US$!
I can understand that due to your looks and lifestyle it is difficult for you to get a partner who is complete in all human aspects therefore you have developed Necrophilia - desire to have sex with dead people. It is because you have poor self-esteem seeing your mother with multiple partners and sister going the same way - never knew your father. Grew up eating rats ergo, you are very fearful of rejection by women/men hence, you desire a sexual partner who is incapable of rejecting you.
Your description of every dead man has been him buried on his belly so that his ass is facing upwards - very unusual way to bury someone ! We know that you have desired Jinnha and Almagir that way and this clearly shows your mental state.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37033 Feb 7, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Not correct either factually or the assessment of victory! Go and read revelations of recent years from the Pakistan's own military leaders of that time (1965).
We have seen how aimlessly you digress from the topics so what you say here is just an extension of your character. I do refer only reliable media for which I pay for and not just ruffle through pages of borrowed India Today standing at some Indian grocery shop some while munching peanuts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_W...
On this link all is given. If you deny this link then give me another reliable one that is supported by many. The only man you are referring here is disgruntled Military man Asghar Khan. His position can be compared with Air Marshal M S Bawa and Maj Gen Atma Singh who have come forward 35 years later to defame Brig Kuldip Singh Chandpuri by saying that Indian army faked the battle of Longewala in 1971 war. Chandpuri was a chutiya officer and suffered from being a motormouth like Harminder and deep inside Air Force officers knew that Longewalla battle was won by Air Force and not Army but they have officially kept a lid on it.
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
India did not commit most of his army but Pakistan did and Pakistan sent its panes to Iran rather then be used.
In Gulf war -I Iraq sent many civlilian and military planes to Iran for safety from the US air force and it is quite possible that due to your old age you have gone senile and have shifted the credit to Indian air force.

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/31/world/teher...

I have looked for any confirmation of your news on the net and found none so it is time for you to wake up from your siesta and provide proof. In the mean time I am giving you a link that might give you some other ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_Air_For...
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Pakistan had to open its irrigation gates to stop advancing Indian tanks. Victories does not mean one adds sq inches or acres to its territory. It depends on the objectives and India never had any objectives of "adding to its territory" since none of the wars (Pakistan's former Air Field Marshall & later an MP, Asghar Khan confirmed)were started by India.
JFV kaput!
Your last closing word JFV Kaput is unnecessary that shows that you are a mischief maker and if I get down to your ass kicking then you would not like it as you will be busy defending your lopsided claims. This also shows that your news is totally false and you are saying it only to support India because you are biased.

Do you even know that there is no Air filed Marshall rank in the air force? Asghar Khan was not a field Marshall ever.

It was Pakistan Army that invaded India after it was brutally defeated by China in 1962. This is also known as second Kashmir war. Tell me, gradpa, if this was Kashmir war then how come India was not aware of the objectives of the war? Weren't they aware that Pakistan had snatched 55% of Kashmir that was due to them due to Hari Singh's gift? While Pakistan captured some 500 sq kms of territory in Rann of Kutch Rajasthan, Indians did grab land Over 1,840 km2 in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors. So why did India give it away? They gained territory in Kashmir so if they were the true rightful owners why was this given back in Tashkent? Because Pakistan had got them by their balls in Rajasthan. In order to recover the Rajasthani territory, India had to return the lands it had captured.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37034 Feb 7, 2013
HAJI KAJI wrote:
If Rana Pratap and Prithiviraj Ji are Myths then who the fck Katuus were fighting with and Kattu historians wrote volumes on it ? Ooooops….d’ya mean Ghori shori all are myths ? Are you confirming Afghan Kattus are chutiya…who stab on Prithiviraj’s grave to take revenge on his killing of Ghori Gandoo ?
Possible….may be all these Kattus never came to India, just played a play in their chutiya country stadium and commentator wrote down the play as history !!! Brilliant….so you agree Muslims never ruled over India ? It’s just a fiction play !
Possible . You see there is a Muslim history which says Hamza (Mohammad’s henchman) came to eastern India and made Rohinga Muslims ! Even Babur laughed at it saying – it is a comedy play, Muslim way !
Thanks for seconding my thoughts…..
BTW teri ammi abhi bhi Gurvinder Driver ke sath time break leti haey, Ya Gurvinder Ji chodtey chodtey VD sE allah kou pyarey hou gaey ?
<quoted text>
Rana Pratap, Prithviraj, Birbal etc were planted by your historians to give you some self respect, If you remember Rana Pratap had a horse called "chetak" ? CHETAK? What the fcuk was that - in Indian schools there is a whole paragraph on this animal of his. It seems he used to speak to Rana Pratap and give him tips how to fight Muslims. You don't expect me to believe all this, Do you?

So much so that even Jimmy wales has been muscled in to open a page on Chetak horse without any statutory warning s that this page is fake.

Mughal emperors ruled India for hundreds of years and your own government has accepted it and honored their rule by naming all important roads of Delhi in their names. Even a very important road, where our fourth Estate is headquartered is named after Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg - the most nalayak Mughal ruler.

Speaking in disrespect for my mother shows that you are perturbed when I pointed out that your sex life sucks literally as you think of sexing up dead people, lady boys (you talk of them very often), pansy Chinese men etc. While I pinpoint your sexual discrepancies by your own talk where you are sexually charged for the people who can not refuse you (dead people, lady boy prostitutes ). It would be nice for you if you kept my mothe rout of this crossfire and fight like a man. Work on the data you get from me as I get from you. Gurvinder truck driver might be one of the guys who was a lorry driver who came in to your area of shanties, dropped his tahmad and lagao aadde teedde fattke to some toothless oriyya woman and drove off by dropping chawaanis and you are pissed like hell to get even.

I am not your types or share anything you have in your life that looks good. The difference between you and me is like Zameen and Aasman. I will leave you to fill in the blanks to give you the benefit of doubt.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37037 Feb 7, 2013
Voice of India wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is your excursion inadvertently always ends up in red light areas where lady-boys are being supplied? Even in your Christmas party you were defining the curves of male Chinese men than women. IS is this an admission that you do have sex with men? as you just mentioned they taste same!
Haji Kaji is like Johnny Lever as his acts of a comedian emerges from his own tragic incidents in his life due to his poverty. Most of the posters from Hindu background are same like him from jhuggis. You must have seen that Johnny Lever never gets a good looking girl in the end of the movie as we would see him settle down with baby Guddi Maruti or tuntun styled some off ball. Here, on this forum, he keeps mesmerizing his escapades with lady boys and their Adam apples and also convince some other virgin Hindu to come and try these lady boys as they taste the same ! This is an important factor - haji kaji said he has tasted them and they taste the same - in other words good. Now to a man like you or me it would make us vomit but he is here boasting that he is in to chakka giri too.

This is what is bothering me about India. We know that male population has increased and female population is at an alarmingly low level. We are looking at 1000 men and 729 women ratio now - abhi sala chakkagiri toe ho ga na !
harminder

Mumbai, India

#37038 Feb 7, 2013
…contd

c. NOW YOU KNOW WHY THE AYAHTOLLAH KHOMENEI HAD TO DEVOTE THE LAST YEARS OF HIS LIFE TO ISSUING INSTRUCTIONS ON WHAT TO DO WITH YOUR QUADRUPEDAL SEXUAL PARTNERS AFTER YOU'RE DONE WITH THEM. THERE WAS AN ENTIRE ISLAMIC ETIQUETTE INVOLVED IN FUCKING, KILLING, EATING AND/OR PASSING THEM AROUND. Apparently, this was a huge problem in the Muslim world way back then, and the advent of the Internet has made it infinitely worse. Now instead of "enjoying" German Shepherd porn as an occasional guilty pleasure, a retreat from the work-a-day world of beating your wives, honor-killing your daughters, spray-painting anti-Semitic slogans on every wall, and praying 11 times day, now thanks to the Internet, you can watch Moroccan Camel Scheisser videos all day long, at your convenience. Why, it's practically hot-and-cold running donkey sex over there. Hey,did you ever notice that the two countries with the most donkey sex (Pakistan, Iran) also happen to be the biggest shitholes on Planet Earth? Someone should study this phenomenon....

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37039 Feb 7, 2013
()emerge from his own tragic .....
harminder

Mumbai, India

#37042 Feb 7, 2013
the sex ratio in islamic countries is so skewed in favour of muslim men that muslim men end up sexing dead women and donkeys
harminder

Mumbai, India

#37043 Feb 7, 2013
confirmed ISLAMIC sex life …STRAIGHT from a "aryan afghan muslim"

"A U.S. military report has revealed some of the consequences of having a low regard for women. Military doctors tell how they had to explain to a local Afghan man how to beget children. When the man heard the explanation, he answered with disgust:“How could one feel desire to be with a woman, whom God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.”

The U.S. military report explains further how “Afghan men struggle with sexual identity.” The report shows that Afghan “men commonly have sex with other men, admire other men physically, have sexual relationships with boys and shun women both socially and sexually.” This is also the case among the Afghan interpreters who frequently infect each other with gonorrhea….."

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37045 Feb 7, 2013
Dabang wrote:
<quoted text>
For your kind information 2/3 rd of J&K of Hari Singh is with India. J&K was not in Hari Singh's hand in october 1947. So whether he wrote whole part of J&K or only half of it, that hardly mattered. Pakistan had almost captured that state. We snatched it from Pakistan.
Chump change, we are only speaking about Kashmir and not J&K. You have been demonstrated that India only owns 45% of Kashmir. Prior to attack by Pakistanis, 100% owner of Kashmir was a Hindu King (sigh). If robbers come to your house rob you of your belongings and hold your family hostage by locking you all in a 4x4 ft toliet - will you say that the house is owned by robbers? Nope ! they are "ghuspaithiyas" and when the police action takes place they will be evicted and you will be freed (in India you will be most likely killed due to nalayak police force). Now if you write on a will and say your house belongs to the Govt of India - authorities will take it over after robbers have been evicted. You cant say that since you were locked in the bathroom your ownership rights are only limited to toilet and you could only give away your toilet.

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#37048 Feb 7, 2013
Dear Chaddi,
After your agreeing that there was no Muslim rule over India , and plight of Muslims in Indian subcontinent is just extension of Kattu culture of playing Luka-Chhipi for survival and to save their a** prior they are hanged like Kasab or made fish feed like OBL, or willingly they pop up by lighting fuse in their a**.

It is noteworthy that in above game most of players have very short life and rarely reach their retirement age, mostly in hurry to enjoy 72 phuddis in heaven ! It is strange that these morons leave their possession of earthly phuddis to be enjoyed by so called infidels . I would like to draw your attention towards NATO experience in Azerbaijan-Sarajevo episode. My German friends, who were on ground have vouched that they re-took over many villages on behalf of Muslims and found whole place didn’t have a single male- all dead or fled- 6 to sixty all were females. NATO has tried their best to improve the breed by copulating with those gals !

I am noticing for long time that you have another delusion that there were wars between India and Pak, where in some cases Pak won .
First of all let me tell you there were no wars between India and Pakistan. All were one sided games where Indians just punished Pakis and gave world entertainment-

1948- gimmicks were to take over Kashmir, Paki tribal insurgents were busy scrwng Nuns in French Missionary , while India peacefully took-over Kashmir ! By what standard you call it a war ? Pakis were in kachcha –baniyan and big pagrdi- I mean not even in uniform ! Even Al quida wear uniform in their war (black robes)!

1965- India kicked a** of Pakis as they showed symptoms of gaand mein khujli ! Paki Khujli mit gai – game khatam ! It was surely not a war .

1971- India just- ek dhakka aur dia, Pakistan kou tord dia ! Do you think it was a war?
If it was a war , India would have taken over B’desh as war spoils….but nope…even Mia Mush claimed sometime back in TV that India’s not taking over B’Desh shows India kicks Paki a** just for fun….as a game. It’s not war !

Kargil ? Even you have even claimed it was not a war !

Then who Pakistan is fighing war with last six decades ???? Not difficult to fathom….Pakistan is fighting with itself for survival. Pak is at war continuously with Pak ! Sometime war is between Politician and Army, sometimes Army with Terrorists, sometime with Russian……well, never with Indians !

When there was no war how there can be winner or loser ?

Dear Paki please continue entertaining Indians- otherwise in Democracy Indians will topple government claiming Indian Army doesn’t entertain Indians Much …as in past !

Luv HK

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#37050 Feb 7, 2013
Now tell me - In Kokata American Consulate is located in Ho Chi Min Sarani....So does it mean Uncle Ho or vietnam ruled over India ?

You need to read fine prints- Intelligent Bongs insulted US by naming the street as Ho Chi Min sarani !

Don't you see Indians have put Ashok Stambh in front of Qutub Minar ? Why ? Just to insult Kattus-.....think over it !
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rana Pratap, Prithviraj, Birbal etc were planted by your historians to give you some self respect, If you remember Rana Pratap had a horse called "chetak" ? CHETAK? What the fcuk was that - in Indian schools there is a whole paragraph on this animal of his. It seems he used to speak to Rana Pratap and give him tips how to fight Muslims. You don't expect me to believe all this, Do you?
So much so that even Jimmy wales has been muscled in to open a page on Chetak horse without any statutory warning s that this page is fake.
Mughal emperors ruled India for hundreds of years and your own government has accepted it and honored their rule by naming all important roads of Delhi in their names. Even a very important road, where our fourth Estate is headquartered is named after Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg - the most nalayak Mughal ruler.
Speaking in disrespect for my mother shows that you are perturbed when I pointed out that your sex life sucks literally as you think of sexing up dead people, lady boys (you talk of them very often), pansy Chinese men etc. While I pinpoint your sexual discrepancies by your own talk where you are sexually charged for the people who can not refuse you (dead people, lady boy prostitutes ). It would be nice for you if you kept my mothe rout of this crossfire and fight like a man. Work on the data you get from me as I get from you. Gurvinder truck driver might be one of the guys who was a lorry driver who came in to your area of shanties, dropped his tahmad and lagao aadde teedde fattke to some toothless oriyya woman and drove off by dropping chawaanis and you are pissed like hell to get even.
I am not your types or share anything you have in your life that looks good. The difference between you and me is like Zameen and Aasman. I will leave you to fill in the blanks to give you the benefit of doubt.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37051 Feb 7, 2013
HAJI KAJI wrote:
Now tell me - In Kokata American Consulate is located in Ho Chi Min Sarani....So does it mean Uncle Ho or vietnam ruled over India ? <quoted text>
Calcutta has always been a communist strong hold so they converted the old name Harrington street and named it after their communist comrade Ho Chi Min of Vietnam. No big deal. We also have Joseph Braz Tito marg in New Delhi so we can not jump to conclusions that Yugoslavia ruled over India.
HAJI KAJI wrote:
Don't you see Indians have put Ashok Stambh in front of Qutub Minar ? Why ? Just to insult Kattus-.....think over it !
<quoted text>
At least you admit that Ashok Stambh was planted much later in Qutub Minar.

Indian historians have been in to this utha patak- latak ke jhatak type of things to rewrite history as the one that was written before didn't suit them at all. If were to go by the actual history then it will be evident that no Indian ever rose beyond the rank of a Mundoo in his life during the raj days. It is true that an Indian was good enough to fill tambaku in chillam or polish "gora" boss's shoes. Our generations of today would be full of disgust if truth is told to them that their forefathers were no good.

I don't live in India but because you all are "jal kukkads" I am writing my domicile as India otherwise you would be busy handing me over a broom and tokri and say that I am cleaning toilets as you guys do wherever you are ! A job you guys can't get over.

I have seen you all under a microscope that is why I can write so provocatively true as truth is bitter.

Few days ago, chump change was busy telling me that India offers me a chance to leave and stay abroad but whites don't need unskilled workers so I smiled broadly and didn't have the heart to tell him that I am living in the west and that too in a country that is an envy of the world due to its technological prowess and perfection.

You guys are living in denial and not only you but even guys like Dak, I don't deny that he is faking his IP of UK, is so backward in his thoughts that I have to blame things on the bankrupt culture we all have live in. religion is the refuge of a loser in the western world and despite of the fact that Muslims are not enjoying a good reputation, westerners are not obsessed with Islam. You guys are calling them "kattus" in contempt not knowing or knowing but overlooking that an average american is also a "kattu" like jew.

To talk to you people I have to literally do time travel and come back to past (stone ages)! If I ever told you that sometimes in a day I use different clocks to refer time ( sand-glass, Coordinated Universal Time and the timezone I am in ) then you guys will kill yourselves in jealousy in trying to figure out the reason behind such a stunt so I have to live a life of a hermit here online. It is a fact that I have shunned Indian-ism in the literal sense in order to be different and I am happy that I did so.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#37052 Feb 7, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..You are correct Islam is and has been very successful ..they are doing something right ..
But, I agree with "mahmood" the internet and the free flow of ideas ,"will be" the death knell of Islam ..
You are a moral person "MUQ" ..even, if you can not admit it ..."Mohammad was tribal chief , and acted accordingly" ..a "true" man of God ..would "never" wield a sword....period ...
..He would never have too...nor, would He want to...
There have been "many predictions" before about the demise of islam. This latest one is also one of them.

The beauty of Islam is that there is nothing hidden in it. Every thing about it is open and in full light.

No one has "exclusive right" to interpret it, there are no official spokesperson , nothing like that.

There are no strange dogmas (like this Trinity and some one dieing for your sins, which cannot be explained reasonably), so it appeals to hearts and minds at the same time.

We are not afraid of Internet, you see people here making lot of abuses and insults and claims, but when they are asked for a proper debate and discussion, they all chicken out.

Look at this Mahmood and his delaying tactics on this simple and short Quranic Surah.

In any fair Analysis, islam will hold its side, because it is the Truth and Truth has special power of its own.

What has happened in this age of Internet is that "everyone" has become an Expert on Islam and can say or claim whatever comes tot heir mind.

But all this Non Scholarship will go away with time and people shall talk and listen to reason.

That is why Islam will continue to grow (I think at a faster rate) in this Information age.

Allah Knows best
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#37053 Feb 7, 2013
John wrote:
he he he he India of British days also consisted of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. nowadays people in Pakistan Iraq and Afghanistan are dying dog's death at the hands of Anglo Saxons.
Ans.

British did not worship the land of undivided India as Mother land or MATA not then and not now.

But it is our Hindu Brothers who love the land as their Mother or MATA.

So British could do to India what they wished, how could a Hindu cause so much blisters on the chest of their MATA as they did during Kargil War. Blowing off the parts of their own MATA?

Eh, eh, eh
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#37054 Feb 8, 2013
Dabang wrote:
<quoted text>
Maulana Sahib, any book in this world is better than your Quran that is causing a lot of violence everywhere in the world.
Read 'I am OK You're OK' of Thomas A Harris. This book is not on religion, but it can be more helpful than Quran, in becoming a good person.
Please interpret sura 9:5 of your great book for our understanding.
Read Surah 9:6 and it will explain many of your questions!! I never get a Question to explain what 9:6 means?

Was 9:5 a complete Surah? Are there no verses before and after it?

That will answer your question about 9:5.

As regards Quran being the source of Violence, then you are misguided.

It is not Quran but people "Trying to wipe out the message of Quran" that is the main cause of violence in the world.

Books like I am OK, you are OK etc.... come on "fringe literature" they sound good but mean nothing.

Like "Turn the Other Cheek" and "Love your enemies" which every Christians say, but when you look at their actions, they will be totally different/

Look what these people did to Iraq and Afghanistan ? Turning the other Cheek and Loving their enemies?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37055 Feb 8, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
So British could do to India what they wished, how could a Hindu cause so much blisters on the chest of their MATA as they did during Kargil War. Blowing off the parts of their own MATA?
Eh, eh, eh
Logic mein tumse jeeta mushkil, Muq !
John Voxx

Secaucus, NJ

#37057 Feb 8, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
British did not worship the land of undivided India as Mother land or MATA not then and not now.
But it is our Hindu Brothers who love the land as their Mother or MATA.
So British could do to India what they wished, how could a Hindu cause so much blisters on the chest of their MATA as they did during Kargil War. Blowing off the parts of their own MATA?
Eh, eh, eh
heh heh heh ur muslim cobrother imi has already started jerking furiously at ur non existent logic. so this is ur muslim logic. let me ask you one thing...if there is a tumor in ur body, wil u allow it to remain in ur body just because it is part of ur body. pakistani and bangladeshi muslims are like tumorous parts on the body of our Mata. so now ur move.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Religion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 min Subduction Zone 74,838
News Message of peace to Islam's detractors on the o... 50 min And burn your Koran 1
News White Women in America cannot be Muslim (May '13) 1 hr Martin garey 12
News Police need more training on hate crime, says A... 1 hr oxbow 4
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Anthony MN 681,728
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 1 hr Faith 517,038
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 2 hr John 124
More from around the web