No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

Full story: Daily Times

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...
Comments
33,481 - 33,500 of 49,157 Comments Last updated 22 min ago
Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36967
Feb 7, 2013
 
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said ! What can you say to an army that has 760,000 infantry and is able to kill only 3000 enemies? On the other hand victory is clearly for the army that had about 200,000 soldiers and were able to kill more than 3000 !
India claims that they have won 1971 war but where is the gained territory? Not an sq inch has been added to its own territory since 1948.
Not correct either factually or the assessment of victory! Go and read revelations of recent years from the Pakistan's own military leaders of that time (1965). India did not commit most of his army but Pakistan did and Pakistan sent its panes to Iran rather then be used. Pakistan had to open its irrigation gates to stop advancing Indian tanks.

Victories does not mean one adds sq inches or acres to its territory. It depends on the objectives and India never had any objectives of "adding to its territory" since none of the wars (Pakistan's former Air Field Marshall & later an MP, Asghar Khan confirmed)were started by India.
JFV kaput!

Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36968
Feb 7, 2013
 
MUQ - wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Dogs do have names and dogs in India are given foreign names to make them stand out and have more respect than human hindus.
Long ago - before even Apartheid became an official term in South Africa, British were using a sign board outside their country clubs, fancy restaurants - " Dogs and Indians not allowed"
A 21 year old Hindu Bengali slut called Pritilata Waddedar killed herself protesting this.
English respected her sacrifice and shortened the sign board to "Indians not allowed" !
Even today many restaurants in India use these sign boards to keep Indians in India away from their establishments. They would rather not do any business with monkey money than tainted Indian rupees from filthy Indians.
Chaddi cretin responding as "MUQ" to his own post as "DAKO"! LOL>>>>>> >>>>>
John Voxx

Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36969
Feb 7, 2013
 
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Not correct either factually or the assessment of victory! Go and read revelations of recent years from the Pakistan's own military leaders of that time (1965). India did not commit most of his army but Pakistan did and Pakistan sent its panes to Iran rather then be used. Pakistan had to open its irrigation gates to stop advancing Indian tanks.
Victories does not mean one adds sq inches or acres to its territory. It depends on the objectives and India never had any objectives of "adding to its territory" since none of the wars (Pakistan's former Air Field Marshall & later an MP, Asghar Khan confirmed)were started by India.
JFV kaput!
Bravo!! what a karara thappad you gave him...his face will remain blue for the rest of the week. india has three borders to defend including east pakistan during those days...indian army was divided to maintain security on three border areas of west pakistan, china and east pakistan. pakistan didnt have any such problems as all other neighbors are muslim nations.
Dabang

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36970
Feb 7, 2013
 
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Chump change, there was a time when I did give you the credit of being well educated by the Indian standards but now even that has faded looking at the quality of posts you have been posting. I saw your two links - hate speeches by Praveen Tagodia and some Raja Bahadur. Both substandard and cowardly. In fact this was the first time I ever saw Tagodia and was convinced as to why you guys are having a low IQ and such pathetic taste. By the way he spoke in that clip one can make out that he is no doctor or someone who practices medicine. He was careful not to take any name but insinuate. How can a leader of 100 crores hindus be so cowardly? While Akbaruddin was blatant in his attacks and even dragged Indian army and police when he was ridiculing Indians but gandu that Tagodia is not even once mentioned Akbaruddin !
Write at least one post that makes any sense.
your father Ghazi Akbaruddin started peeing in his pant when the Andhra police started interogatting him.....mere ku chhod do sahab...wo bayan mera nahi hai...

“Kradvanto Viswam Aryam ”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36971
Feb 7, 2013
 
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hindu kothe ki uppaj,
tere maathe pe jo teeka laga hei woh kya teri ma ko choomte hue tere sar pe chipak gay ahei ya baap ki lipistik hei? Madarchod teri himmat kaise hui mere ko direct address karne ki ... harami, apni chakka giri apne chakkon tak seemit rakh bhaddwe ! Chal bhaag ja yahan se !
Tableau of Islamic civilization .

“Kradvanto Viswam Aryam ”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36972
Feb 7, 2013
 
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hindu kothe ki uppaj,
tere maathe pe jo teeka laga hei woh kya teri ma ko choomte hue tere sar pe chipak gay ahei ya baap ki lipistik hei? Madarchod teri himmat kaise hui mere ko direct address karne ki ... harami, apni chakka giri apne chakkon tak seemit rakh bhaddwe ! Chal bhaag ja yahan se !
Bachhe , it is called TILAK not bindi aur tika .[ It shows your shallow knowledge about Hinduism .
Dabang

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36973
Feb 7, 2013
 
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you imitate Shakepear? Can any imam imitate Van Gogh? Why dont you give it shot? Why dont you try composing tunes like Lennon & McCartney and see how far you'll get. You and I have been through this discussion before. Any authorship, good or bad, leaves behind his/her own imprint within a particular style of writing which is impossible to imitate.
11th CE scholar Al Maari from Aleppo wrote his own version of the Koran and when theologians of his time told him that it did not have the same mesmerizing impact as the Koran, he told them to let it be heard in the mosques for a couple of centuries and then find out. One poem of his always comes to my mind:
The Prophets, too among us come to teach,
Are one with those who from the pulpit preach,
They pray, and slay, and pass away, and yet
Our ills are as pebbles on the beach.
What so special about Sura 112? Self-proclamation of greatness as is never valid. I'll give you something better than Sura 112. Here is what Article 18 of the charter of human right says:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance".
Show me a verse as accomodating as this in the Koran? That is why I keep screaming that my moral values are better than the Koran. Never in my life have I ever condemned anyone to hellfire, even if that person disagrees with my views. I will debate the person but never wish him ill-will. The author of the Koran is immoral, confining people to the most brutal form of punishment simply because of their religious beliefs. A pagan is a pagan because he was born a pagan which is not his fault - allah is unjust & cruel on top of that.
Looking forward to your response.
Pick any book of the world , it would be better than at least the book of terrorists (quran) that is causing a lot of violence in the world. Quran is a mixture of distorted biblical stories, pagan belief(kabah, allah, qurbani) and Mohammad's own views. Tell MUQ to interprate sura 9:5 of his great book.

“Free Speeech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36975
Feb 7, 2013
 
HAJI KAJI wrote:
Dear Friends,
MUQ mentioned to know God , one need to read original Quran, and to read Quran one need to know Gods language- Arabic !
MUQ Chaddi combo are Kattu Muslims who present a monogenesis of languages and claim that the Arabic language was the language revealed by God for the benefit of mankind and the original language as a prototype symbolic system of communication, based upon its system of triconsonantal roots, spoken by man from which all other languages were derived, having first been corrupted. Statements spread in later centuries regarding the Arabic language being the language of Paradise are not considered authentic according to even the scholars of Hadith and are discredited in wholesale.
What is Arabic ? There are innumerable varieties of them , and at may times mutually unintelligible !
Then Arab League’s ‘Classical Arabic’ is few decades old and based on language of Quran, which itself was written many centuries after Mohammad . And still the language is far from Sanskrit- Most scientific language in world (any computer software guy will vouch for it).
The Quuran describes myths of era when most spoken language in that region was Aramaic and Semitic languages. At that time Arabic was limited to – barking , chirruping, sign language, crying , laughing etc….which they learnt while absorbing climate benefits in burning desert (as MUQ confirms).and main activity was to copy paste from other languages !
Mohammad’s God Allah must be crazy to reveal his secrets to an unlettered person, in a future language unknown to whole humanity !!!!
No wonder Mohammad’s version of revelation is so full of misunderstandings ! He survived history due to his misunderstanding …..not understanding of God ! And MUQ likes are surviving on same note !
Luv
HK
Nicely put; It's a shame that MUQ doesn't realize that the language god uses is universal , why are there so many different languages on this planet,is it to separate us from each other ?

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36976
Feb 7, 2013
 
HAJI KAJI wrote:
Oosney chodi tou teri Dadi kou hogi....tabhi tou ooskey baad pura generation lully kata kar convrt hou kar ...Allah hou Akbar kar raha haey !
That sea face appmnt is just one of the property I hold ..ha...ha....Jamadar ka jagah khali haey , join karega ?<quoted text>
"Oosney chodi tou teri Dadi kou hogi" aise behoshi mein pooch raha hei jaise guess work kar raha ho! Bhangi choot bhang pee ke chud-ti hein kuch hosh nahin sab behosh - jo aaye marzi se chod-ta hua chala jaye bahar katori padee hei ..jisko jitna dena hei daal de katori mein.

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36977
Feb 7, 2013
 
Monique wrote:
<quoted text>
Earlier you said sea face Worli now Worli Sea Face. Sweetie your dimagi halat is very nazook. Last night you kept holding on to the strap on vibrator in your sleep and calling it "my big horsie". You need rest and medications. No fancy residences on Malcha Marg or Worli sea Face for you. You have no idea about Bombay. Stop being a fool.
Massrape kke ki fasal bhaang mein baita hei kya bhadwwe? Meine kab pucha tere jaise chutiye se? Haraam ke jane , ma ke laudde bambai shehar hum logon ka banaya hua hei ..tere jaise sirf mootari chalate hei .. suwidha walla.

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36978
Feb 7, 2013
 
John Voxx wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?a nnotation_id=annotation_598499 &feature=iv&src_vid=_b NFN5j0dAU&v=t7MVv9xwhrc
just watch how pravin togadia made akbaruddin owaisi his catamite. he made akbaruddin look like a total chakka and yet he didnt make a single hate statement in this wise speech. All togadia did was to remind muslims of the nellie massacre when the police was removed. just watch how muslims are described as cowards who left their original religion.
parvin Tagodiya pansari walla agarwal lag raha hei... bund fati hui hei uski naam nhi le raha saari ki saari film mei.

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36980
Feb 7, 2013
 
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Not correct either factually or the assessment of victory!
How nice! Simply writes "not correct" and he expects his word to be taken. How deluded.
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>Go and read revelations of recent years from the Pakistan's own military leaders of that time (1965).
He tells imi to go but doesn't give him the address? where should he go to? to haji kaji 's tabela to fcuk his cows and goats? Old man thinks he is a traffic policeman guiding traffic.
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>India did not commit most of his army but Pakistan did and Pakistan sent its panes to Iran rather then be used.
he doesn't know that wikipedia has a page on 1965 war and has written actual strength of both armies. It gives actual scores on both sides. tomorrow he will get up and say that 3000 dead on Indian side also accounts for people who died natural deaths all across the country during the 25 days of the conflict. OH MUQ!
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>Pakistan had to open its irrigation gates to stop advancing Indian tanks.
And Indian soldiers opened their zippers showing their buttocks for invading ghazis to park their lund maulanas - that he forgets. He only fantasies such things but fails to give links and expects people to believe.
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>Victories does not mean one adds sq inches or acres to its territory. It depends on the objectives and India never had any objectives of "adding to its territory" since none of the wars (Pakistan's former Air Field Marshall & later an MP, Asghar Khan confirmed)were started by India.
he has kept the basic requirements of a victory out of the equation by which we can judge as India has never gained any ground ever but declared victories. Someone should ask this extremely old man who has dentures in his mouth and hydraulics under his lully that Pakistan snatched half of Kashmir in 1948 so wasn't that an objective to reach by snatching our lands back? Why the fcuk is army for? sing songs and dance like Bhaands?
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
JFV kaput!
What is this, moron? war cry? bellicose !

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36981
Feb 7, 2013
 
John Voxx wrote:
<quoted text>Bravo!! what a karara thappad you gave him...his face will remain blue for the rest of the week. india has three borders to defend including east pakistan during those days...indian army was divided to maintain security on three border areas of west pakistan, china and east pakistan. pakistan didnt have any such problems as all other neighbors are muslim nations.
oye filthy naali ki paidaish, karara thappad is

when Pakistan snatched half of kashmir despite of the fact that you were the rightful owners.

When Your parliament was bombed.

When mumbai became the example of crying in pain city in 2008

When major unikrishnan was shot through the heart and his black blood stained the roof he fell on like a stuck pig.

When Kargil hills were snatched.

When even today Pakistan has kept the highest peak and you say it was not worth it.

When is not when some deluded fart writes some gibberish in his delirium.

ja ab apni ma ki chut baja.
Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36982
Feb 7, 2013
 
SaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
How nice! Simply writes "not correct" and he expects his word to be taken. How deluded.
<quoted text>
He tells imi to go but doesn't give him the address? where should he go to? to haji kaji 's tabela to fcuk his cows and goats? Old man thinks he is a traffic policeman guiding traffic.
<quoted text>
he doesn't know that wikipedia has a page on 1965 war and has written actual strength of both armies. It gives actual scores on both sides. tomorrow he will get up and say that 3000 dead on Indian side also accounts for people who died natural deaths all across the country during the 25 days of the conflict. OH MUQ!
<quoted text>
And Indian soldiers opened their zippers showing their buttocks for invading ghazis to park their lund maulanas - that he forgets. He only fantasies such things but fails to give links and expects people to believe.
<quoted text>
he has kept the basic requirements of a victory out of the equation by which we can judge as India has never gained any ground ever but declared victories. Someone should ask this extremely old man who has dentures in his mouth and hydraulics under his lully that Pakistan snatched half of Kashmir in 1948 so wasn't that an objective to reach by snatching our lands back? Why the fcuk is army for? sing songs and dance like Bhaands?
<quoted text>
What is this, moron? war cry? bellicose !
She male is disturbed. Pakistan grabbed part of J & K when J & K was independent and had a powerful muslim prime minister.
Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36983
Feb 7, 2013
 
Plenty of clips about Air Field Asghar Khan on the web. Not difficult for anybody but the she male!
Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36984
Feb 7, 2013
 
SaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
oye filthy naali ki paidaish, karara thappad is
when Pakistan snatched half of kashmir despite of the fact that you were the rightful owners.
When Your parliament was bombed.
When mumbai became the example of crying in pain city in 2008
When major unikrishnan was shot through the heart and his black blood stained the roof he fell on like a stuck pig.
When Kargil hills were snatched.
When even today Pakistan has kept the highest peak and you say it was not worth it.
When is not when some deluded fart writes some gibberish in his delirium.
ja ab apni ma ki chut baja.
Deranged jihadists is celebrating Mumbai attack!

Since: Nov 10

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36985
Feb 7, 2013
 
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Deranged jihadists is celebrating Mumbai attack!
black widow old fart mourns fellow hindu but acknowledges the status of stuck pig hehehehe

“NEWS ANALYSIS”

Since: Aug 12

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36986
Feb 7, 2013
 
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
It depends on the objectives and India never had any objectives of "adding to its territory" since none of the wars (Pakistan's former Air Field Marshall & later an MP, Asghar Khan confirmed)were started by India.
You should not shoot in the dark by guesstimating. Asghar Khan was no Field Marshall and if you concede this folly then rethink your whole post and support it by giving credible links.

For your information Field Marshal Muhammad Ayub Khan has remained the only field marshal in the Pakistan army to date. He appointed himself as a field marshal when he was the second president of Pakistan, as well as the commander in chief of the army.

There is no shame in admitting if you are wrong.

“NEWS ANALYSIS”

Since: Aug 12

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36987
Feb 7, 2013
 
SaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
he has kept the basic requirements of a victory out of the equation by which we can judge as India has never gained any ground ever but declared victories. Someone should ask this extremely old man who has dentures in his mouth and hydraulics under his lully that Pakistan snatched half of Kashmir in 1948 so wasn't that an objective to reach by snatching our lands back? Why the fcuk is army for? sing songs and dance like Bhaands?
If you all scroll down the same link of 1965 war on wikipedia, you would find the result as shown below:

According to the Library of Congress Country Studies conducted by the Federal Research Division of the United States–
The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops.

Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their country's military defeat by "Hindu India" and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government.

English historian John Keay's "India: A History" provides a summary of the 1965 war–

The 1965 Indo-Pak war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate.

Newsweek magazine, however, praised the Pakistani military's ability to hold of the much larger Indian Army
Dak-Original

Leicester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36988
Feb 7, 2013
 
Voice of India wrote:
<quoted text>
You should not shoot in the dark by guesstimating. Asghar Khan was no Field Marshall and if you concede this folly then rethink your whole post and support it by giving credible links.
For your information Field Marshal Muhammad Ayub Khan has remained the only field marshal in the Pakistan army to date. He appointed himself as a field marshal when he was the second president of Pakistan, as well as the commander in chief of the army.
There is no shame in admitting if you are wrong.
oops! >>Air Marshall Asghar Khan who was Chief of PAF in 1965. However that does not alter the essence of my post.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••