First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Oh good lord

Niagara Falls, NY

#30 Sep 17, 2012
Lol. That Obviously wasn't river from JQ that posted that, miss public school education. Anyone with the barest minimum of intelligence can comprehend that was posted by a snarky bitter websluether.

I was reading at JQ for over a year before I even found out River founded Websleuths,

You must be a friend of the Baby Killer. Tell her to do the decent thing and bury that child properly. How a mother can let fish or wild animals have the body of a baby they carried for nine months is incomprehensible. She doesn't even have to get off Facebook, just post a flipping map.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#31 Sep 18, 2012
Of course it was the same RiverSelah who posts at JQ. She has you snowed because she is a pathological liar. Or maybe you are River and that's why you continue to deny it. I have a WS account, but I haven't posted there in ages. Also, for the record, I am not a friend of any baby killer. Your statement just makes you sound ignorant.
Oh good lord

Niagara Falls, NY

#32 Sep 20, 2012
No, you accusing me of being River makes you sound like an idiot.

I don't read at web sleuths. That crazy owner wants personal information. Fuck that.

I see River advocating for a missing, probably murdered baby. I admire her dedication, hers and many many others on JQ. Even when I don't agree with them. And the post on this thread by "river" was clearly being sarcastic. So when another poster pointed out a different set of facts, I merely told them "river didn't write that"

Having read her posts at JQ, her style is much different. But whatever. Your opinion of my posts is already what it is, and I don't care either way.

You have yourself an OUTSTANDING weekend.
BongWaterDrinker

Saint Louis, MO

#33 Sep 21, 2012
Oh good lord wrote:
No, you accusing me of being River makes you sound like an idiot.
I don't read at web sleuths. That crazy owner wants personal information. Fuck that.
I see River advocating for a missing, probably murdered baby. I admire her dedication, hers and many many others on JQ. Even when I don't agree with them. And the post on this thread by "river" was clearly being sarcastic. So when another poster pointed out a different set of facts, I merely told them "river didn't write that"
Having read her posts at JQ, her style is much different. But whatever. Your opinion of my posts is already what it is, and I don't care either way.
You have yourself an OUTSTANDING weekend.
You apparently cannot read either, or understand what you read when it comes to quoted text. Get a grip, moron.
BongWaterDrinker

Saint Louis, MO

#34 Sep 21, 2012
Let me add something else here. If you have been watching how she posts on JQ and on FB involving missing child cases as long as I have, then you would know who she is and what her writing style is, and how she likes to backpedal when she's gets busted for her stupidity. Thanks..now YOU can have a nice evening.
Oh good lord

Niagara Falls, NY

#35 Sep 23, 2012
BongWaterDrinker wrote:
Let me add something else here. If you have been watching how she posts on JQ and on FB involving missing child cases as long as I have, then you would know who she is and what her writing style is, and how she likes to backpedal when she's gets busted for her stupidity. Thanks..now YOU can have a nice evening.
Lol @ Facebook. Biggest data mining site on the web. You're welcome to it, and the drama that goes along with it.

I'm not here to debate anyone about this or that JQ poster's intelligence. My comment was merely "river didn't write that" in regards to the sarcastic post bragging about whatever that was attributed to a poster on here going by river selah. I've read enough of her posts to know that wasn't her style.

So kindly GFY. Clearly you're the moron, and probably a relative of that Baby Killer Bradley, which makes you an epic tragedy for mankind if true. It's pathetic how willing people are to let that horrific cow off the hook for destroying an innocent life. You Bradley zealots are worse than than the Anthony clan ever could've dreamed being.

Deborah Bradley is a no account, drunken, cheap wine guzzling, piece of trash who should be behind bars.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#36 Sep 24, 2012
Kindly GFY, whomever you are. This topic isn't about Deborah Bradley, this topic is about the posters at WS and JQ. I just pointed out that River Selah is nothing but a liar and a phony. Too bad that your head is too far up your ass to see it.
Oh good lord

Niagara Falls, NY

#37 Sep 24, 2012
mixologist1974 wrote:
Kindly GFY, whomever you are. This topic isn't about Deborah Bradley, this topic is about the posters at WS and JQ. I just pointed out that River Selah is nothing but a liar and a phony. Too bad that your head is too far up your ass to see it.
Well, the drunken baby killer is certainly a topic on both forums isn't she? So my post is as relevant as yours, obviously.

I have no opinion about river's veracity, I don't know her personally, and my original post concerning this topic was merely pointing out she wasn't the author of the comment attributed to her.

You sound like an embittered, mentally challenged shut-in. Stop frothing all over your keyboard and go get some air.
Longhaul

Eugene, OR

#38 Jan 25, 2013
Try Scared Monkeys. And JQ is terrible.
Mixologist74

Chesterfield, MO

#39 Jan 26, 2013
Longhaul wrote:
Try Scared Monkeys. And JQ is terrible.
Oh I've been to scaredmonkeys before, it's not like WS or JQ. Both are equally horrid.
King George

Seymour, IN

#40 Feb 26, 2013
In certain cases, one has to wonder if a poster is truly an advocate for a missing child, yet so naive and ignorant that they would blindly believe anything they are told.
Or if a poster is a conspirator in a cover up as to what actually happened to that child.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#41 May 2, 2013
Solving and investigating crimes over the internet is essentially impossible. Investigators knock on doors, talk to real people, collect evidence and do mountains of real world research. Much of that is unavailable to the internet posting public.

With that in mind, the online community is a mixture of people, ranging between well intentioned observers trying to use logic to sort through the information and busy body gossips who spread misinformation callously.

On that spectrum, from my experience, Websleuths has the better posters who are on the well intentioned observers side. Topix and Scared Monkeys are on the busy body side, and Justice Quest is in the middle. But leaving more toward Websleuths.

Of course, Blinkoncrime is on the busy body end of things. The low end.
whodunnit

Kansas City, MO

#42 May 14, 2013
Yes, River is a true liar. She posted "inside" information she had by a "family member" who lives in the neighborhood. Well she showed her ignorance by stating that her "insider" said that the only time that the kids were ever seen outside was when they were waiting for the school bus. Her ignorance and lies are revealed by this statement. The elementary age kids DO NOT RIDE THE BUS at all in the neighborhood. I could go on....
Franklin

Hermosa Beach, CA

#43 Jun 1, 2013
BOLO wrote:
Well, betwen the 2, go for WS. At least you can discuss the case rather than hear about the mod' of you r thread & her accomplishments. They all need mental health counseling.
Sounds like ScaredMonkeys too. A bunch of bullying old grannies saying "Find Natalie" every post and then talking about thei grandchildren and not really contributing anything useful
Franklin

Hermosa Beach, CA

#44 Jun 1, 2013
No thank you to that wrote:
LMAO, believe me, I hear ya!I never wanted to join Justice Quest because I had read too many of the posts contributed by its members. All it seemed to be was a bunch of bored grannies mentioning their grandchildren at any opportunity, though their grandchildren are not at all relevant to the thread topics. Oh, and every other post seems to read "Find Madame X!" (in reference to the current case of a missing woman)Yeah, because that is so very helpful to the case!If it's not "Find Madame X," it's some moderator asking everyone to stay on track. Apparently, their idea of "on track" is to continually post "Find Madame X!" Another thing that turned me off was irrelevant posting by a person on there who seems to think her drug experience is of interest to anyone. I read about her use of Ambien and crank and decided that if I wanted to hear such prattling, I would just pretend to be a junkie and attend NA meetings. I was under the impression that JQ was a forum related to current crime cases, not a confessional for druggies and grannies cackling and knitting.Needless to say, I never wanted to get involved in that mess after I read all those posts, so I justdidn't bother,obviously.I would avoid it at all costs. I don't know anything bout websleuths at all. I haven't read anything on there, so I can't comment about that one. For all I know, it is somehow connected to JQ, and that's why I never bothered to check it out.
Everything you say describes "ScaredMonkeys" as well. Old ladies posting "Find Natalie" and not contributing anything to solving the crime and then talking about their grandchildren on every post.
Franklin

Hermosa Beach, CA

#45 Jun 1, 2013
Mixologist74 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I've been to scaredmonkeys before, it's not like WS or JQ. Both are equally horrid.
This describes ScaredMonkeys forum mindgames against posters:

"What is mobbing?
The word bullying is used to describe a repeated pattern of negative intrusive violational behaviour against one or more targets and comprises constant trivial nit-picking criticism, refusal to value and acknowledge, undermining, discrediting and a host of other behaviours which are defined on my page "What is bullying?

..........where a target is selected and bullied (mobbed) by a group of people rather than by one individual. However, every group has a ringleader. If this ringleader is an extrovert it will be obvious who is coercing group members into mobbing the selected target. If the ringleader is an introvert type, he or she is likely to be in the background coercing and manipulating group members into mobbing the selected target; introvert ringleaders are much more dangerous than extrovert ringleaders.

In a mobbing situation, the ringleader incites supporters, cohorts, copycats and unenlightened, inexperienced, immature or emotionally needy individuals with poor values to engage in adversarial interaction with the selected target. The ringleader, or chief bully, gains gratification from encouraging others to engage in adversarial interaction with the target. Many people use the word "mobbing" to describe this pack attack by many on one individual. Once mobbing is underway the chief bully foments the mobbing into mutually assured destruction, from which the chief bully gains intense gratification - this is a feature of people with psychopathic personality.

One aspect of psychopathic bullies is that they home in on Wannabe types - non-psychopathic lesser bullies - and then empower these individuals to gain the positions of power and authority they crave. Once installed, the Wannabe's lack of competence makes them dependent on the chief psychopath, which means they become unwitting but willing compliant puppets. They also make perfect corporate clones and drones. A characteristic of the Wannabe is that as well as lacking all the competencies necessary for their position, they also lack the intellect to understand the nature and manner of their compliant subservience.

Throughout the mobbing experience, the target is deceived into fighting, blaming and trying to hold accountable the minor bullies of the mobbing group rather than the chief bully.

.......The chief bullies appear so charming and plausible to naive, unenlightened and inexperienced people - usually those who haven't experienced bullying themselves. Psychopathic chief bullies are very likely to have everyone in human resources and management in their pocket, who are then manipulated into further mobbing, victimising and persecuting the target.

The golden rule when tackling a mobbing situation is, I believe, to identify and focus exclusively on the chief bully, and concentrate on holding this ringleader accountable. Expect an immediate increase in mobbing activities, and a rapidly-expanding web of deceit to be concocted against you.
Maybe they thought I knew too much when they kicked me out.
Victim

Tucson, AZ

#46 Jun 4, 2013
After Blink On Crime published an article with false information about me, I watched it spread to many forums. I defended myself on many of them.

Justice Quest members were reasonable and the moderators were fair.

Websleuths was the same, though they took it a step further and verified my identity, which they told me they did with anyone claiming to have inside information about any case.

Scared Monkeys would not approve my account. My posts on both forums were reasonable and fact based. Those forums welcomed inside information that corrected the disinformation originating on the BOC site.

Even Reality Chatter allowed me to create an account and post a response to the disinformation and rumor being posted about me.

But Scared Monkeys simply won't approve an account. It seems they are not interested in allowing their members to have access to accurate information and allow people the opportunity to defend themselves against lies being posted on their website.
Angela

Bay Saint Louis, MS

#47 Jun 19, 2013
GBH wrote:
Through with WS. Given them too many chances
Mods posing as members - often
Targeting good posters by using mods posing as members to deliberately provoke. When the target responds, they're banned
If WS can't find one iota of reason to ban, they simply ban anyway. No means of redress.
Why do they do it? Simple, WS attempts (is paid?) to steer people's opinions. When intelligent members produce content which contradicts Websleuth's agenda, that intelligent member is provoked so WB can ban. Or if the intelligent member intelligently refuses to rise to the bait, they're simply cut-off and banned anyway
It's apparently true that WS inflates its member count. Does it in a variety of ways, non of them ethical
Such an unethical site cannot be trusted, obviously. Not trusted with anything, especially not your privacy or personal info
If WS were trustworth, there wouldn't be so many ex members or so much hatred of WS
I read some shocking things about Websleuths. And I discovered all and more to be true. The smart ones get out, leaving only the chaff chatting garbage with mods posing as members
LOL. That site is a vomit-causing joke run by some very bitter and disturbing individuals, imo
What would be the purpose of provoking a member, then to kick them off? You say it's because they can't steer opinion. I've been a longtime member of WS. I have disagreed with popular opinion more times than I could count, and I have never been kicked off. Many members like myself are Law Enforcement, or family of Law Enforcement with a lot of insight to add to cases. Are some of the mods jerks? Yes, but that can be said for three-fourths of the general population. What is your point, and can you substantiate your "facts"?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#50 Jun 30, 2013
I am not a troll, A former WS member who left!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Portland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Organized Stalking / Gang Stalking Oregon Forum (Jan '14) 8 hr Oregon Target 6
need any kind of job 10 hr jerald 2
Susanna Weinstein at PCC 19 hr Anonymous 1
why are half of Portland topix discussions abou... Sep 16 Glenn 3
Where are the underground, cash jobs in Portland? (Oct '08) Sep 13 40aln 31
Roofing Hail Damage Telemarketing Leads Sep 10 Frank Falcone 1
Boycott Big Box Retailers and Chinese Sellers O... Sep 9 EbayRevealed 2
•••
•••
•••

Portland Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Portland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Portland News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Portland
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••