Though it's been a long tedious process, I feel I have discovered the true identity of Woodsman001.
All is revealed in this YouTube video...
Posted in the Cats Forum
#1 Oct 16, 2012
Anyone that frequents this Topix forum, and many other cat-related forums around the internet, is well aware of the psychotic cat-hater who usually posts out of Minnesota. This lunatic uses the screen name of Woodsman001 on most of the blogs and forums to which he posts, although he has more recently used many other aliases (Further Help, Reality Czech, Clues4Clueless, Reality for Lunatics, etc) and locations here on Topix. A Google search on "Woodsman001" shows that he has been a trolling psychopath on cat sites for 2-3 years, and has been banned from many of them.
Though it's been a long tedious process, I feel I have discovered the true identity of Woodsman001.
All is revealed in this YouTube video...
#2 Oct 18, 2012
Did you have fun with your obsessive compulsive disorder in judging your own demented and psychotic net-stalking post 50 times?
If only this were a fairy-tale. Woodsman001 could have your 1st-born if you don't guess his name in time. Which none of you psychotic cat-c_nt-licking net-stalkers have yet to do.
1st-born--now that's a laugh. No man will ever go near any woman who is so desperate and psychotic over the love of cats. Any man that finds out a woman loves cats runs away as fast as they can from them. Cat-c_nt-licking women have already proved that they are incapable of being a sane person in a healthy relationship with a human. And they are most likely barren--using cats as surrogates for the children they can never have and which nobody wants to give to them. I guess this is what has turned you into the proved psychotic net-stalker that you are. No man, nor anyone, wants you. They never have, never will.
What's the matter? Isn't the attention from your pussies ever enough?
#3 Oct 18, 2012
Get back to stroking your shriveled little dicky loser.
#4 May 3, 2013
He lives on Galveston Island and was prosecuted in 2007 for murdering a lost pet. The jury (this was Texas, remember) was hung.
He has staged bogus "attempts on his life" as well. He is simply unbalanced and the truth is he's a threat to others.
He's a hero to much of the "bird community", and leads outings for them to Costa Rica and other vacation destinations.
He spoofs his IP addy.
#5 Jul 2, 2013
James M. Stevens well known birder shot & killed a catGalveston, TX
On the toll bridge at San Luis Pass, they take care of much more than just spare change.Surrounded by a sanctuary for wildlife and birds, the bridge itself is a sanctuary for cats in Galveston County.I cant even talk about it. Im almost afraid to get them too tame because they trust people and people like this morning come out here and shoot them, said toll bridge operator John Newland.Newland, 68, said he was manning his post as usual when a van from the local bird watching society pulled under the bridge and opened fire on one of his cats.I ran over to the edge and looked over and saw the van parked down there and hollered at the man to stop shooting and he panicked and got in his truck and took off, said Newland.I told him, I says There he goes John, go get him, said toll bridge operator Howard Etzel.
A chase ensued and police intercepted 53-year-old Jim Stevenson, a prominent ornithologist, now charged on a felony count of cruelty to animals.Somebody like that just has to hate animals. How could he be a birdwatcher and then hate cats? I dont know, said Etzel.
(Photo courtesy of the Galveston Police Department) Stevenson has only been charged with killing one cat, Newland said 10 cats had been shot in recent months. They are buried under the bridge.
Theyre just like family. I told my wife that when I die, I want my ashes to be buried here [under the bridge] so I can protect the cats, said Newland.Police said they werent sure what Stevensons motive was, but his bond was set at $10,000.Update 4/12/07: A grand jury indicted the founder of the Galveston Ornithological Society n a felony charge of cruelty to animals.
Prosecutors accused Jim Stevenson, 53, of loving birds a little too much. He faces a charge of cruelty to animals in the November shooting of a cat. More than once, Stevenson has stated that feral cats on the isles West End are a danger to bird populations.
In November, police arrested Stevenson after a report of shots fired near the San Luis Pass toll bridge.When patrol officers reached the West End, they stopped a van with a Galveston Ornithological Society logo on its side.One of the toll-bridge workers was following the van and later told police the vans occupant had shot a cat for which the bridge worker had been caring.Police later found a .22-caliber rifle in the white van.
Stevenson discussed the hours before his arrest after his release in November. His account appeared on the Texbirds online message board.He wrote that, the night before his arrest, he saw a feral cat on the West End creeping up on three snowy and two piping plovers, and several sanderlings.Stevenson wrote that he tried unsuccessfully to capture the cat. However, the next morning, he saw it and several other cats in the area, making him concerned for endangered and threatened birds whose habitat lies near the isles western tip.State law offers a variety of definitions of cruelty to animals. One is killing an animal without its owners consent.
While Stevenson has never publicly admitted shooting the cat, he told The Daily News last year the charge was not valid because the cat was feral and had no owner.
However, the bridge worker, who testified before grand jurors, had told police he and his peers regularly laid out food for the cats and had come to think of them as pets.
The bridge worker had also told investigators nearly a dozen cats had been killed in the area in the months prior to Stevensons arrest.
#6 Jul 2, 2013
Update 11/13/07: Jurors heard opening arguments in the trial of a bird-watching enthusiast who fatally shot a cat that he said was stalking endangered shorebirds.
James M. Stevenson says he was protecting piping plovers.
The defendant, James M. Stevenson, is the founder of the Galveston Ornithological Society and leads bird-watching tours on this Gulf Coast island 60 miles southeast of Houston. If convicted on animal cruelty charges in the shooting last November, he faces up to two years in jail and a $10,000 fine.
Stevenson, 54, does not deny using a .22-caliber rifle fitted with a scope to kill the cat, which lived under the San Luis Pass toll bridge, linking Galveston to the mainland. He also admits killing many other cats on his own property, where he operates a bed and breakfast for some of the estimated 500,000 birders who come to the island every year.
In her opening statement, Paige L. Santell, a Galveston County assistant district attorney, told the jury of eight women and four men that Stevenson shot that animal in cold blood and that the cat died a slow and painful death gurgling on its own blood.
She said that the cat had a name, Mama Cat, and that though the cat lived under a toll bridge, she was fed and cared for by a toll collector, John Newland. He is expected to testify.
Whether the cat was feral is the crucial point in this case. Stevenson was indicted under a state law that prohibited killing a cat belonging to another. Prompted by this case, the law was changed on Sept. 1 to include all cats, regardless of ownership.
Ms. Santell argued that because Mr. Newland had named, fed and given the cat bedding and toys, the cat belonged to him and was not feral.
Stevensons lawyer, Tad Nelson, admitted in his opening statement that his client went to the San Luis Pass toll bridge with an intent to kill. but that he had planned to kill a wild animal that was preying on endangered piping plovers.This man has dedicated his whole life to birds, Mr. Nelson said, pointing at Stevenson.
The case has prompted emotional commentary on the Internet. Cat enthusiast blogs have called Stevenson a murderous fascist and a diabolical monster. Birding blogs have defended his right to dispense with a terrible menace and have set up funds to help pay for his defense.In an interview in a courthouse elevator during a break in the trial, Stevenson said heatedly that cat fanciers who have condemned him and sent him hateful correspondence think birds are nothing but sticks. Testimony followed from police officers and the veterinarian who performed the autopsy on Mama Cat, a white and gray tabby mix. The jurors were shown several photographs of the bloodied cat, reminiscent of an episode of CSI: Miami. fater the 2006 shooting of a cat that lived under the San Luis Pass toll bridge another cat could be seen)Pictures of the crime scene showed trays of cat food, blankets and cat toys hanging from strings under the bridge. The .22-caliber rifle Stevenson used to kill the cat along with his magazine full of Remington hollow-point bullets were also on display
#7 Jul 22, 2013
Oh look, they're all WRONG again. LOL
In honor of their perpetual wrongness, we bring you this cat-lickers' cyber-bullying report:
Cat-lickers (irresponsible and psychotic cat-fanatics) post any and all anti-cat news events on their web-sites, blogs, email-chains, etc.(I keep track of these to watch how they operate), then within 1 hour of the news over 50,000 of them from all over the world will descend on any site that is about some controversial cat issue, start up at least 3 international petitions, and then fire off addresses (business and home), phone numbers (business and home), names, and even photos of everyone involved so they can then net-bully everyone into submission.(The more dedicated cat-lickers from organizations like Alley-Cat-ALL-LIES will then even fly cross-country or internationally to attend any protests and meetings to voice their warped views.)
Google for: LOEWS HOTELS FERAL CATS
Another replay of what these cat-licking sociopaths do, Google for: CATS VENICE COMPLEX REPRIEVE
A $150 million renovation project for low-income housing, put on hold, jobs lost, money lost, homeless still homeless, court costs and lawyers, just to save a few of their feral vermin c-Rats. And the saddest part of all, the vast majority of these TNR'ed cats had already died heinous inhumane deaths from TNR-practitioners' "death by attrition".(Road-kill, diseases, parasites, injuries, environmental poisons, cat & animal attacks, exposure, etc.)
Similar scenarios can be found by Googling for feral cats and churches, universities, hospitals, shopping centers, malls, apartment complexes, etc. Cat-lickers delusionally believe that any land on which a cat has stepped-foot is their own property and they can manipulate and control the owners and all laws on it.
This is precisely why everyone is learning to destroy all cats on their properties as quickly and quietly as possible. Telling nobody beforehand about any cats even being there. Long before these psychotic cat-licker sociopaths and psychopaths get wind of the cats. Shoot cats first -- tell no-one later. The only thing worse than feral cats are feral cat-lickers. You can legally shoot the former, not the latter. You need to pay lawyers and courts to get rid of the latter. THEN you can get rid of their cats. And the sad part is, that's EXACTLY what happens, each and every time.
People are wising-up. If ANY cats are around they destroy every last one of them first, before they make any other move.
In support of anyone who has been net-bullied by these cat-licking sociopaths and psychopaths, people are now shooting AT LEAST 1 cat per day to start to put a dent in the ecological-disaster and disease-outbreaks that these net-bullying cat-lickers have caused and are hellbent on perpetuating worldwide.
Did you bury your CLC "Cat-Lickers'-Cat" today? In honor of their net-bullying tactics.:-)
That's the new chain of events that they have to stop. Let's see them try.
#8 Jul 22, 2013
Have you ever considered that your perspective is warped due to mental illness.
#9 Aug 30, 2013
Having read a few of your missives (they seem repetitive,) I fail to understand your POV.
Cats are, after all, not only hunters, but prey.
Cats have been bred to many configurations, but if allowed to breed freely tend to breed towards a brown tabby of ordinary size. There is no evidence that they hunt any more or differently than they have since we first discovered that they were great for rodent control.
The biggest fallacy of ecology is that an ecology can remain stable forever--the situation always changes and so do the organisms which make them up.
The attempts to eliminate cats in Europe are listed in the causes of the Bubonic Plague epidemics in Europe.
Cats are often blamed for reducing bird populations, and in some cases this is undoubtedly true, but the most common prey of cats are insects, followed by small mammals.
The one thing I haven't seen in any of your posts are references which support you rather outrageous claims.
It concerns me that your hatred is focussed so tightly on a single species, since few if any events have only a single cause, this combined with your use of extremely loaded words and the evident distaste if not hate for anyone who disagrees with you hurts your case far more than it advances it.
Obviously you are intelligent and educated, but you do seem unbalanced at best, and perhaps dangerous to at least your neighbor's and their property if not actively dangerous to yourself.
Don't bother replying for my sake, as I've erely determined to ignore you as a minor irritation.
#10 Sep 3, 2013
Rather than address all your 3rd-grader's bible-home-schooled ignorance that you just spewed, I'll touch on one of them to prove to everyone what an utterly ignorant, manipulative, and deceptive person you are -- just like every last cat-licker on earth.
The oft-spewed myth and deceptive lie of cat-lickers -- that if we don't let cats roam free we are all going to die of the plague. ALSO proving that you are a self-evident and self-professed sociopath/psychopath. Cat-lickers like you would gladly and gleefully sacrifice ANY human life; even the lives of children that are now being bitten by your rabid cats; than have any of your disease infested, native wildlife destroying, pestilent vermin, invasive species cats die to save the lives of any other living thing on earth.(Example: Destroying just 1 cat saves the lives of countless 1,000's of defenseless native animals and all their offspring being tortured to death. If you want to stop the senseless torture of animals being gutted alive and skinned alive for cats' writhing and twitching play-toys every hour of the day, every day of the year, there's no quicker and more effective method to stop the senseless torture of animals than to instantly kill just one free-roaming invasive species cat. Kill 1 invasive species cat = stop 1000's of valuable native animals being tortured to death for cats' toys. That's the equation.)
Now, to address your cat-lickers'-LIE:
Please explain to the class how an animal, the domesticated cat in this case, which is perfectly capable of carrying and transmitting the plague all on its own could have prevented the plague in Europe.
Google for: Cat-Transmitted Fatal Pneumonic Plague
The plague is alive and well today, and BEING SPREAD BY CATS. People have already died from cat-transmitted plague in the USA.
Or Google for: Oregon man suffering plague
Or: Taos cat has plague
Or:(hundreds of others).
Totally disproving that oft-spewed LIE cat-lickers, just like you, tell about having more cats in Europe could have prevented the plague. No rats nor fleas even required if you have cats around. Cats themselves carry and transmit the plague all on their own. Now add in the fact that cats attract rodents right to them if the cats infect the rodents with cats' Toxoplasma gondii parasite (Google for: Parasite Hijacks the Mind of Its Host), and you'll see a plague the likes of which have never existed before. Especially when you breed super-strains of plague with your overuse and irresponsible use of antibiotics. Cats, after centuries of being selectively-bred by humans, are also now even genetically predisposed to seek-out human habitation. They will contract the plague from animals away from human habitation and then bring it RIGHT TO YOUR DOOR.
Cats also congregate in colonies. If a cat contracts the plague from any flea or other animal it then spreads it to all other cats in its colony and any other animals or humans that come in contact with them. Hence: no fleas nor rats required after the initial infection. The very act of a cat killing a plague carrying rat will cause the cat to contract the plague from the rat or its fleas and spread it to any lives that come in contact with that cat.
The plague in Europe was actually spread the most by human to human transmission. The distance and speed with which it spread cannot be accounted for by fleas, rats, nor cats. But they ALL played the part in transmitting it to humans initially.
This doesn't give ignorant, manipulative, and deceptive bible-home-schooled cat-lickers any kind of license whatsoever to run around screaming their scare-mongering tactic of, "IF WE DON'T LET CATS ROAM FREE WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE OF THE PLAGUE!"
When, IN FACT, the absolute reverse of that could come to pass.
#11 Sep 3, 2013
In case anyone is curious -- the term that I use of "cat licker" is justifiably and accurately gleaned from the growing fad of people who are obsessed with cats and want to do everything possible to make their cats feel good at the expense of all that is reasonable and sane.
They are now licking their cats clean.
youtube D0T com/watch?v=p9xmiOxsTWg
Since they see a cat fighting back from being washed in water as animal abuse, but the cat not fighting if they use their tongues, they use their tongues instead to wash their cats.
It's just another one of the many aberrant and mentally-ill behaviors of "cat lickers".
I cannot, in all good conscience and honesty, EVER use the term "cat lover" again to describe these heartless and spineless cretins. People who love cats do not throw them under the wheels of moving cars, let them lap-up antifreeze in a gutter, force them to attack one another to fight for territory (no different than people who run dog-fight rings and are just as criminal of animal abuse), or let them be attacked by other animals by letting them roam free. "Cat Lover" is an extremely oxymoronic label. "Cat Licker" is the only one that accurately works today.
#13 Sep 3, 2013
The only thing anyone would be "curious" about is how you became a first class moron...LOL!!
|Laser Declawing...Better? (Jan '07)||Sep 19||Lauri||603|
|Can You Tell a Wild Cat from a Pet Cat?||Sep 6||Dan Felix||1|
|The Man Who Thought He was a Cat||Jul '16||HumanSpirit||1|
|Help- my cat is getting so skinny . HE IS ALL B... (Jul '07)||May '16||Rose_NoHo||366|
|IBS or Irritable Bowel Syndrome in cats. Probio... (Jan '16)||May '16||Eagle 12||2|
|Should cats be allowed oudoors? (Mar '09)||Apr '16||CHENYAN||944|
|somebody help! cat pulling his hair out (Jun '07)||Apr '16||Jennab23||40|
Find what you want!
Search Cats Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC
Enter your email to get updates on this discussion.