'Scum' shot my pet cat through eye

'Scum' shot my pet cat through eye

There are 54 comments on the Isle of Wight County Press story from May 12, 2012, titled 'Scum' shot my pet cat through eye. In it, Isle of Wight County Press reports that:

A BELOVED pet cat will lose its eye - and was millimetres away from losing his life - after he was callously shot with an air weapon.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Isle of Wight County Press.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Phil

Sarnia, Canada

#41 Sep 13, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's add reading comprehension deficiency to the list of your massive list of shortcomings.
You are not the first cat hater (by a long shot) to provide links to documents in an attempt to justify violent, vigilante injustices toward cats. None of these legitimate, peer-reviewed documents (such as the Toronto site) condone the behavior which cat haters like you promote. You have failed miserably, just like the cat-hating idiots that have come before you.
NO-KILL shelters and sanctuaries (as stated in my previous post) mean just that. There 0% of cats that die (except for natural causes) in these facilities. The number of these facilities are growing across North America. They are committed to providing a comfortable life for unwanted and feral cats, and are the preferred alternative to most local city-run shelters which euthanize cats after a period of time. Your glee for the latter again confirms your viscous nature. You are scum of the earth.
---
BTW, correction for my previous post...
"provide by Topix" should read "provided by Topix"
You people make me laugh so hard. Pathetic really. You keep telling me I cant write and your the one using spell check. Ha. Not like you couldent understand everything I said. Also kinda funny thats the second time you had to correct yourself. Your not even worth argueing with just keep on letting the cats roam but dont bitch and whine when they die. No tears here. And yes here in my home town they euthanize a large mojority of there cats each year just as it should be.=)
FookCatHaters

Sparta, WI

#42 Sep 13, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You people make me laugh so hard. Pathetic really. You keep telling me I cant write and your the one using spell check. Ha. Not like you couldent understand everything I said. Also kinda funny thats the second time you had to correct yourself. Your not even worth argueing with just keep on letting the cats roam but dont bitch and whine when they die. No tears here. And yes here in my home town they euthanize a large mojority of there cats each year just as it should be.=)
Wow! Are you really that damn stupid? I don't USE the spell check, it is automatically there. When you see the red squiggly line under a word while typing a reply, the Topix spell check thinks the word is spelled wrong. If you right-click on the word in question, suggested corrected spellings are presented. You then click on the one you intended to type. For example, your post to which I'm responding has 5 words flagged, and your post #35 has 15 words flagged. The feature is intended for typists to catch typographical errors. But, in your case, it serves as a spelling lesson that you never learn. You just keep misspelling the same words over and over. STINKCAT is right, you are as illiterate as they come.

BTW, I charge $90 per hour (one hour minimum) for computer-based instruction such as I have provided you above. Please post your address, as I need to send you an invoice.

When I notice a typo that I made, I correct it, even if it was something the spell check could not catch. If Topix had an after-the-fact edit feature, I would have corrected it within the original post. It's just common courtesy to the reader. Oh wait, I forgot to whom I was talking. You're a cat hater. You have no concept of courtesy.

If I'm not worth arguing (please note the CORRECT spelling) with, why do you keep replying? Moron.
FookCatHaters

Sparta, WI

#43 Sep 13, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You people make me laugh so hard. Pathetic really. You keep telling me I cant write and your the one using spell check. Ha. Not like you couldent understand everything I said. Also kinda funny thats the second time you had to correct yourself. Your not even worth argueing with just keep on letting the cats roam but dont bitch and whine when they die. No tears here. And yes here in my home town they euthanize a large mojority of there cats each year just as it should be.=)
Wow! Are you really that stupid? I don't USE the spell check, it is automatically there. When you see the red squiggly line under a word while typing a reply, the Topix spell check thinks the word is spelled wrong. If you right-click on the word in question, suggested corrected spellings are presented. You then click on the one you intended to type. For example, your post to which I'm responding has 5 words flagged, and your post #35 has 15 words flagged. The feature is intended for typists to catch typographical errors. But, in your case, it serves as a spelling lesson that you never learn. You just keep misspelling the same words over and over. STINKCAT is right, you are as illiterate as they come.

BTW, I charge $90 per hour (one hour minimum) for computer-based instruction such as I have provided you above. Please post your address, as I need to send you an invoice.

When I notice a typo that I made, I correct it, even if it was something the spell check could not catch. If Topix had an after-the-fact edit feature, I would have corrected it within the original post. It's just common courtesy to the reader. Oh wait, I forgot to whom I was talking. You're a cat hater. You have no concept of courtesy.

If I'm not worth arguing (please note the CORRECT spelling) with, why do you keep replying? Moron.
FookCatHaters

Sparta, WI

#44 Sep 13, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! Are you really that stupid? I don't USE the spell check, it is automatically there. When you see the red squiggly line under a word while typing a reply, the Topix spell check thinks the word is spelled wrong. If you right-click on the word in question, suggested corrected spellings are presented. You then click on the one you intended to type. For example, your post to which I'm responding has 5 words flagged, and your post #35 has 15 words flagged. The feature is intended for typists to catch typographical errors. But, in your case, it serves as a spelling lesson that you never learn. You just keep misspelling the same words over and over. STINKCAT is right, you are as illiterate as they come.
BTW, I charge $90 per hour (one hour minimum) for computer-based instruction such as I have provided you above. Please post your address, as I need to send you an invoice.
When I notice a typo that I made, I correct it, even if it was something the spell check could not catch. If Topix had an after-the-fact edit feature, I would have corrected it within the original post. It's just common courtesy to the reader. Oh wait, I forgot to whom I was talking. You're a cat hater. You have no concept of courtesy.
If I'm not worth arguing (please note the CORRECT spelling) with, why do you keep replying? Moron.
Sorry for the double post.
Phil

Sarnia, Canada

#45 Sep 13, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry for the double post.
And your the smart one...
FookCatHaters

Sparta, WI

#46 Sep 14, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
And your the smart one...
FYI, the first one didn't show up for several minutes. Didn't think it processed, as Topix sometimes rejects posts due to words used. You'll notice that the second post had the word "damn" removed from the first line of text to remedy what appeared to be the problem. Both posts then appeared about 5 minutes later.

Yep, I'm the smart one. When I make a mistake, I make amends.

BTW, you can't even get a 5 word post right. It's "you're", not "your". Another English 101 failure for you, the cat-hating illiterate.

Again I ask, if my debate with you is not worth it, why are you STILL replying???
greywintersky

AOL

#47 Sep 14, 2012
Alert to all readers: The person posting as "Reality Czech", "CatLoversIQBelowCats ", "CatLovers R Stupid", "Forest Smith", "Nature Advocate", and dozens of other aliases (sock puppets), is none other than the cat killing advocate "Woodsman001". He has posted on hundreds of other cat, feral cat, and even hunting sites in the last few years encouraging others to poison, drown, shoot, and even blind cats. He must be caught and brought to justice. He spews his false facts about cats to scare others into being fearful of cats. If you happen to disagree with him or criticize him, he will start on his "cat lovers are all demented" rant. Google his "name", or some of his familiar statements, and you will see the vile messages that he has been spreading about cats. Most of the good folks on other sites have seen through this nasty monster...and have warned others about him too.
Cure4CatLoverPsy chotics

United States

#48 Sep 15, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet another ignorant, violent, sub-human thug.
Did you even read the article at the link you posted? It states that you have ONLY the right to trap a cat in Toronto, not kill it. It also states that one of the major dangers to cats is HUMAN CRUELTY. That's YOU, moron!
Shoot to maim is punishable under the laws that define animal-cruelty (these are the ONLY cases that cat-lovers cite to try to manipulate and scare everyone from shooting their only favorite animal). But shoot to kill is a perfectly legal way to humanely destroy an animal. The same laws and principles that apply to methods of humanely hunting animals also applies to cats. Unlike cat-lovers' psychotic beliefs, the reality is that a cat is just another animal. It's NOT their baby, their child, their offspring. Even if they do view their cats that way, letting them roam free is no less criminally irresponsible than them telling their child to go play in the freeway and then blaming the cars for their child's death. If they let their cat roam free, NO MATTER HOW IT DIES, that is THEIR fault and they can be charged with all laws that clearly define animal-neglect, animal-abandonment, and animal-endangerment. Not to mention being in direct violation of all international invasive species laws in existence.

In fact, here's a publication from a study done by the University of Nebraska on the best ways to HUMANELY deal with a feral-cat problem wherever you live. This documentation INCLUDES the best firearms, ammo, and air-rifles required to HUMANELY destroy cats. deenawinter.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/ec178...

Besides, what difference does it make if the cat gets shot or ran over by a car, attacked by another cat or animal, drowned, or poisoned by plants animals or chemicals (inexpensive 1-adult-strength generic acetaminophen pain-relievers gaining in popularity, for being so species specific). The result is the same. The cause is the same -- the fault of the criminally irresponsible pet-owner that let their invasive species pet roam free. They've already proved that their animal is 100% expendable. You can either destroy their cat for them humanely, or let their lack of care cause it to inevitably die inhumanely. They don't care one bit how their cat might cruelly suffer to death if they let it roam free. Humanely destroy their cat for them before that can happen. A well aimed bullet is the MOST humane death that ANY stray or feral cat can ever look forward to. Any other death that they WILL eventually face is all inhumanely downhill from there.
Cure4CatLoverPsy chotics

United States

#49 Sep 15, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you and your kind who are the most destructive, invasive species on the planet, not cats. The language of your post reveals just how violent, disrespectful, and hateful an individual you really are.
Here's my standard issue prepared reply for bible-home-schooled people like you:

Homo sapiens is NOT an invasive species ANYWHERE, you freakishly stupid moron. Since humans have the genetic code to give them the capability to travel/migrate to ANY part of the globe, this means they are native to any area they can travel to on their own. Just like birds that have this capability and can travel to different continents and islands. Those that have the flight-range required to do so are NATIVE to those areas that they are capable of traveling to ON THEIR OWN.

(And for the love of all that's good in the world, PLEASE don't display your further ignorance and stupidity by trying to claim that Europeans, Native Americans, and Asians are different "species". That's usually your next huge omelet-on-the-face move that you astoundingly ignorant fools make.)

Whereas, an animal genetically engineered through selective breeding, such as CATS, are NOT AN INDIGENOUS SPECIES ANYWHERE. They are no more natural to any native environment anywhere on earth than some genetically engineered insect that was invented in some lab, that once released out into nature will destroy all native wildlife, JUST AS CATS DO. Someone once kept a "pet" bee one time. He too selectively bred this pet. After he selectively bred it it was called an Africanized Bee. It accidentally escaped his supervised confinement, and look what happened. Luckily for us they're' not destroying the complete food-chain in every ecosystem where they are found today, are limited in their range, and they're not spreading many deadly diseases to all humans and wildlife -- you know, all those fun things that these domesticated-species cats do.

If you phenomenally stupid cretins are going to use ecology, biology, speciation, and genetics in your arguments, the very LEAST that you could do is have a base comprehension of what you are talking about. Don't you think?

No. And that's the problem with terminally ignorant morons like you, you CAN'T think.

If ONLY there was a legal cure for "stupid".
Cure4CatLoverPsy chotics

United States

#50 Sep 15, 2012
FookCatHaters wrote:
<quoted text>
NO-KILL shelters and sanctuaries (as stated in my previous post) mean just that. There 0% of cats that die (except for natural causes) in these facilities. The number of these facilities are growing across North America. They are committed to providing a comfortable life for unwanted and feral cats, and are the preferred alternative to most local city-run shelters which euthanize cats after a period of time.
This psychotic and delusional "No-Kill" religion (conceived of, based on, and fueled by their own relentless fear of death) is the very cause of the most heinous, widespread, and longest lasting animal abuse in the history of humanity.

http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/07/21/how...
Cure4CatLoverPsy chotics

United States

#51 Sep 15, 2012
greywintersky wrote:
Alert to all readers: The person posting as "Reality Czech", "CatLoversIQBelowCats ", "CatLovers R Stupid", "Forest Smith", "Nature Advocate", and dozens of other aliases (sock puppets), is none other than the cat killing advocate "Woodsman001". He has posted on hundreds of other cat, feral cat, and even hunting sites in the last few years encouraging others to poison, drown, shoot, and even blind cats. He must be caught and brought to justice. He spews his false facts about cats to scare others into being fearful of cats. If you happen to disagree with him or criticize him, he will start on his "cat lovers are all demented" rant. Google his "name", or some of his familiar statements, and you will see the vile messages that he has been spreading about cats. Most of the good folks on other sites have seen through this nasty monster...and have warned others about him too.
Looks like we can add another common trait to all psychopathic and sociopathic cat-lovers -- they have proved themselves to be psychotic and obsessed net-stalkers too. Is anyone surprised? LOL The funny part is, they don't realize that to a thinking person, none of what they have found disproves anything that has been posted. It's just more childish red-herring evasion so they don't have to face up to the responsibility and fault of themselves being the direct cause of all these cats having to be shot to death now. Make no mistake about that! If it weren't for this "graywinterfool" net-stalker and all these other criminally irresponsible cat-lovers that let cats roam free, NONE of these cats would have to be destroyed today.

THEIR FAULT AND THEIR FAULT ALONE.

No net-stalking required to prove that! LOL
STINKCAT

London, UK

#52 Sep 16, 2012
Cure4CatLoverPsychotics wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like we can add another common trait to all psychopathic and sociopathic cat-lovers -- they have proved themselves to be psychotic and obsessed net-stalkers too. Is anyone surprised? LOL The funny part is, they don't realize that to a thinking person, none of what they have found disproves anything that has been posted. It's just more childish red-herring evasion so they don't have to face up to the responsibility and fault of themselves being the direct cause of all these cats having to be shot to death now. Make no mistake about that! If it weren't for this "graywinterfool" net-stalker and all these other criminally irresponsible cat-lovers that let cats roam free, NONE of these cats would have to be destroyed today.
THEIR FAULT AND THEIR FAULT ALONE.
No net-stalking required to prove that! LOL
There is medication available for your obsessive compulsive disorder you know! however your stupidity probably runs in the family.
STINKCAT

London, UK

#53 Sep 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You people make me laugh so hard. Pathetic really. You keep telling me I cant write and your the one using spell check.
You keep telling yourself everyone is as stupid as you and you'll be OK LOL!
God

Schenectady, NY

#54 Sep 16, 2012
Reality Czech wrote:
<quoted text>
You are clearly ignorant of the well understood laws in the USA and elsewhere. Unfortunately, backwater countries like the UK don't care about their native-wildlife, they've already destroyed most of them to extinction already, so they don't take the same measures with their destructive invasive-species cats.
The law in the USA is that it is perfectly legal to destroy any animal, someone's pet or not, that is threatening the health, well-being, and safety of your own animals or family (also true even in most densely populated cities, firearms laws permitting, if not then 700-1200fps air-rifles are commonly used). The only animals exempt from you taking immediate action, legally, are those listed on endangered or threatened species lists, and any bird species under protection of MBTA (the Migratory Bird Treaty Act). Even then variances can be given should there be sufficient problem but this requires further study by authorities. Since cats are listed in the TOP 40 WORST invasive-species of the world in the "Global Invasive Species Database", this means they have no protection whatsoever from being shot on sight, they are not on any protected-species list anywhere in the world. And in fact, if your area enforces and obeys invasive-species laws -- as they should -- then it is against the law to NOT destroy any cat on sight, someone's pet or not. It is your civic and moral responsibility to destroy any invasive-species that is found away from supervised confinement and roaming freely in a non-native habitat.
I shot and buried HUNDREDS of these vermin cats over two years ago. Feral or not, stray or not, collared or not, they all got shot. Since stray cats are the very source of all feral cats they have to be destroyed just as rapidly too in order to get the feral cat problem under control. My land has been 100% cat-free ever since. Keep your cats under supervised confinement or you prove to me and the whole world that you really don't give one damn about your cat -- and neither do I!
You are a fucking liar. You need to show us where this so called law is that anyone can kill another persons pet for the reasons you so stated. First of all every states Dept of Agi and Markets dictates that states laws. No two are alike. And the rest of your post is bullshit too. Evil is the word that comes to mind when I read your post. Someone ought to get rid of you cause you are worse than any invasive species in this country. Scum!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cats Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Laser Declawing...Better? (Jan '07) May '16 E-Kar 599
Help- my cat is getting so skinny . HE IS ALL B... (Jul '07) May '16 Rose_NoHo 366
IBS or Irritable Bowel Syndrome in cats. Probio... May '16 Eagle 12 2
News Should cats be allowed oudoors? (Mar '09) Apr '16 CHENYAN 944
somebody help! cat pulling his hair out (Jun '07) Apr '16 Jennab23 40
My boyfriend have cat start not eating Jan '16 Josie 1
Need suggestions to fatten up my male cat (Jul '08) Jan '16 Alana 29
More from around the web