Health Law Birth Control Coverage Bef...

Health Law Birth Control Coverage Before Justices

There are 7 comments on the National Public Radio story from Mar 23, 2014, titled Health Law Birth Control Coverage Before Justices. In it, National Public Radio reports that:

The Obama administration and its opponents are renewing the Supreme Court battle over President Barack Obama's health care law in a case that pits the religious rights of employers against the rights of women to the birth control of their choice.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at National Public Radio.

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#1 Mar 23, 2014
Birth control should not only be available, it should be progressively mandatory.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#3 Mar 23, 2014
An employer has no right to force their religious beliefs on their workers.

If this company's 13,000 employees are of the same faith, the employer would not even have to consider it an issue, because they would all be of the same mindset.

You can not discriminate an employee based on race, creed, sex, or religious orientation / that is the law in all states!

An employees right to birth control is a personal choice / this bogus complaint won't stand in court.

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#4 Mar 24, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
An employer has no right to force their religious beliefs on their workers.
If this company's 13,000 employees are of the same faith, the employer would not even have to consider it an issue, because they would all be of the same mindset.
You can not discriminate an employee based on race, creed, sex, or religious orientation / that is the law in all states!
An employees right to birth control is a personal choice / this bogus complaint won't stand in court.
Damn straight. If the employee wants to buy birth control or have breast implants or a tummy tuck, they can do it. It's none of the company's business.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#5 Mar 24, 2014
RustyS wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn straight. If the employee wants to buy birth control or have breast implants or a tummy tuck, they can do it. It's none of the company's business.
You are right about this.
Just so, if a person wants a health insurance policy that does not cover these benefits, it's not the business of the Federal Government to insist they must buy one.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#6 Mar 25, 2014
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right about this.
Just so, if a person wants a health insurance policy that does not cover these benefits, it's not the business of the Federal Government to insist they must buy one.
There already exists a religious exemption for churches under the ACA.

This is a slippery slope as to which drugs a company may use under religious exemptions. Case in point, Hobby Lobby currently allows their male employees access to Viagra, and only specific birth control, but they are arguing for exemptions to IUD's and Morning After pills. Who's to say an employer may fight to exclude themselves from other medications as well should the SCOTUS decide in their favor?

A 1990 decision regarding an American Indian claiming religious exemption to use Peyote because of his beliefs were thrown out by Scalia, stating "when the law is shown to be applied evenly, religious freedom can not be taken into consideration" indicating a concern that the floodgates for litigation would inevitably be the outcome.
This company is using the Citizens United ruling, which states that corporations are in fact people, which we all know is not the case.

Your argument that the government should not make it ones business to buy certain coverage is not entirely valid. Over 50% of women use birth control pills for non reproductive purposes, and 98% of all Catholic women surveyed have also stated they have in fact used birth control at one point in their lives. Mandating an individual has basic choices is in fact government working FOR the people, not against them. To interpret this as government intrusion is a long shot, but we differ in our views.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#7 Mar 25, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
An employer has no right to force their religious beliefs on their workers.

If this company's 13,000 employees are of the same faith, the employer would not even have to consider it an issue, because they would all be of the same mindset.

You can not discriminate an employee based on race, creed, sex, or religious orientation / that is the law in all states!

An employees right to birth control is a personal choice / this bogus complaint won't stand in court.
There is no Right to birth control, abortion or to change the definition of marriage. It's a liberal mith they propagated to try and sway low information voters to like evil.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8 Mar 26, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no Right to birth control, abortion or to change the definition of marriage. It's a liberal mith they propagated to try and sway low information voters to like evil.
Marriage is not defined in the constitution as between one man and one woman, but you GOP morons had no issue passing DOMA, did you?

Abortion IS the right of any woman you low life imbecile. Roe v Wade concluded that you twit.

Seems you're the low info voter you love to refer to.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Social Security Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Shutdown divides services into essential and no... 36 min Retribution 2
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 17 hr spud 16,245
News Social Security is Going Bankrupt Jan 18 NOOPHRA 4
Over the $2000 limit Jan 15 Sophrosyne888 1
News Voter fraud and the right to cast honest ballots Jan 14 Death on 2 legs 1
News Social Security: Understanding the government p... Jan 8 king of kings 12
News How undocumented immigrants buy homes in the US Jan 7 king of kings 65
More from around the web