lol...you're quite funny, really. You stated I had a side in this. Thus you lied stated I had a side in this because I don't have a side in this.<quoted text>
You consistently argue against equality. One does not need to overtly state their position on an issue to imply their views.
It is not about happiness, it is about equal protection of the law. It is also specifically about gay marriage (read the thread title).
Equal protection can ABSOLUTELY be denied if doing so serves a compelling state interest. So your "whatever make you happy argument" is so much juvenile BS.
My 'overtly position' as you term it is real and factual. I don't give a rat's *ss about who marries whom or who marries what as long as they are of a legally defined age to understand what their getting into.
I have never argued against the equality issue liar. All you do is assume I think this and believe that and you as foolish *sses do assume you're correct in your bigoted prejudicial judgement of me and you're wrong.
You don't like the fact that I have stated I don't care about who marries whom or what.
You think everyone has to have a position.
You're wrong and you're in error.
I DON'T CARE. Can you get that? Can you possibly understand that? I respect marriage but I have not a care of who marries whom or what as long as their a defined adult to understand what their getting into.
Fricking quit stroking your over inflated ego dude, you're making a whole lotta wrong statements from doing it.