News Analysis: How Will the Supremes ...

News Analysis: How Will the Supremes Rule on Marriage Equality?

There are 22 comments on the EDGE story from Dec 11, 2012, titled News Analysis: How Will the Supremes Rule on Marriage Equality?. In it, EDGE reports that:

The world will not end on Dec. 21, 2012, but for gay families it might get considerably more complicated... or blessedly more equal, or perhaps even both at once... once the Supreme Court issues its rulings on two monumentally important cases, with rulings expected sometime in mid-2013. The two cases involve the constitutionality of the anti-gay ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#24 Dec 12, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"it places certain rights beyond the reach of the vagaries of any temporary majority."
That is true, but only to provide protection against the "vagaries". There still must exist in society, a baseline, a soul, or character of that society, and protections which guarantee it's continued existence.
For example, it is reasonable for society to enact laws which punish certain acts, set minimum drinking ages, age of consent, etc. in the establishment of that baseline. The nine members of SCOTUS, among others, help establish that baseline, and simply cannot ignore the needs of society in favor of the rights of the individual.
Allowing same-sex couples the ability to marry in no way harms society. It doesn't prevent heteros from continuing to marry & have kids & divorce & remarry & have more kids & divorce & abandon their families; just like they currently do.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#25 Dec 12, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"A soul? Really? A character of society must exist? "
Sure, did you think that a society is just a document?
"In order to deny citizens a fundamental right, government needs to have at least a legitimate governmental interest."
There IS a "legitimate government intest". It's called survival.
You refer to anti-gay- marriage sentiment as a "vagary", associated with extremists and fundies. You don't have to be an extremist nor a fundie to to recognize that homosexuality and gay marriage may present a legitimate danger to society.
Your support consists of only about half of the populuation. Can the other half all be extremists and fundies?
If homosexuality and gay marriage are are harmless as you imply, it would not have taken you 2000+ years to get to this point.
How does allowing same-sex couples to marry affect the survival of society or our govt or the country? Heteros aren't being banned from marrying or having kids. They will continue breeding as they always have.

Inter-racial marriage isn't harmful to society either, yet it took just about that long for it be accepted as well.

Women had no say in society for thousands of years either; do you claim they are harmful as well?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Social Security Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Undocumented Workers Contribute Billions to SSI... 1 hr shnuffmopopo 69
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) Nov 15 corky 16,115
News Trump Must Keep His Promise: Repeal DACA Nov 15 corky 296
Initial Claim Process Nov 14 Grams 60 1
News Social Security: Understanding the government p... Nov 12 James 2
News ASU senior and DACA recipient arrested in Washi... Nov 10 tomin cali 1
News The crooked Secret Service agent who stole Silk... Nov 9 THN mom 4
More from around the web