Social Security disability approvals decline

Dec 1, 2013 Full story: The Times-Tribune 84

The 39-year-old Wilkes-Barre man had Huntington's disease, a debilitating and often fatal disorder that caused tremors in his hands, left him off-balance and suffering from frequent bouts of confusion.

Full Story
First Prev
of 5
Next Last
lady

Columbia, PA

#1 Dec 1, 2013
People with a physical disability are denied before people with mental are. Perhaps he should have claimed he was bipolar and have some quack right it up.
Isn't it sick that someone who can't wipe there own ass or is missing a leg get's denied while a person with a hyper-active or depressed kid collects a disability check? One law states u must be unemployed 1 year before they can even be elligable. Lawyers should be slapped for taking money from the disabled. It's like taking the wheel off someone's wheel chair if the law says your entitled you certainly don't need some attorney holding your hand ensuring your rights the courts are supposed to do that right???
Anyway if your disabled (eligible) and only off work 6 months and you file you will automatically be denied based on the year rule because you were not off work one year. So lawyers no this what an easy case. They file an appeal knowing darn well your eligible wait the year and a half it takes to get through the appeal process that's if your lucky, and collect a portion of your check at some point while your going without in the process.
Lawyers and judges the courts in general are set up in such a way that it's all about money now no longer right and or wrong.
The judges that deny these poor unfortunate souls should be held accountable for ignoring the law when there is a "clear cut case".
Here's an example of how a york county judge ignored the law. Case of Trout v. Strube victim had Protection from abuse Order against Strube ( 4rth order in 10 years it should be 3 strikes and your out but that's a different topix) anyway the PFA act has a section that states the victim upon any violation of the order could request an extension of the term and judge Linebaugh in york county claimed that the word shall in the PFA act meant "at the Courts discretion" this dis-honorable judge ignored the law and robbed the victim of the justice the law says she is entitled to but what's it to him???
Judges suffer no consequence either way what motivation is it to rule rightly??? Imagine how much of a payoff they probably got from s.s. to make that decision initially.
Judges also recieve term salary too. They have no discipline and the very judicial center is also a RACIST SCAM please allow me to explain.
Judge Kelley of york county pa is white and had sex with a public defender while being a judge on the criminal bench, then she put a Protection from abuse against him so the presiding judge (Linebaugh) moved Kelley from the criminal bench to the civil to continue his unjust and inhumane screwing. So the judge who had a PFA against himself got to hear and rule on PFA cases unscathed.
Next we have the Honorable Judge Ballentine a black judge of Lancaster County Pa.
This poor judge was allegedly issued parking tickets way after the alleged violations (which is not legal, after 60 days they are no longer able to site you for a violation allegedly taking place more than 60 days prior) anyway, she was accused of dismissing parking tickets the news paper said nasty shit about her ect. she waS suspended 2 years. How fair is that???
Kelley pennitrated, and perverted justice plus couldn't keep his hands and pee pee to himself while on the bench and nothing done to him.
We need Judges to be held liable and responsible and have honest people of perhaps another kind of board than the current disciplinary one meauring out just punishment for such asshole judges.
They make money either way. Usually the one persuing justice vcan't afford to bribe the courts they are to busy litigating and paying other fees.


lady

Columbia, PA

#3 Dec 9, 2013
In the instant case look at how much money the court generated for itself and the attorney;s while initially screwing this guy out of his rights until later. Why couldn't they have just given it to him in the beginning. Because they don't have to and unless your willing to fight for it you probably won't get it.
I don't understand how children who never worked a day in there life can get a check when they have parent's who are legally responsible for them and this poor guy has a family and no other means of support and didn't get it until he went through hell.
What's worse is some of these kids there parents collect it too. But they deny people like him.
THE COURTS AND IT"S JUDGES ARE CORRUPT PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A JURY DECIDING THESE CASES NOT SOME BIAST AND PAID "ADMINISTRATIVE" JUDGE who can easily be bribed. It's a little harder to do that with "jurors" of your peers but I guess only Criminals truly get to excersise there rights to a FAIR HEARING
SSA bigots Klan

San Diego, CA

#5 Dec 11, 2013
lady wrote:
People with a physical disability are denied before people with mental are. Perhaps he should have claimed he was bipolar and have some quack right it up.
Isn't it sick that someone who can't wipe there own ass or is missing a leg get's denied while a person with a hyper-active or depressed kid collects a disability check? One law states u must be unemployed 1 year before they can even be elligable. Lawyers should be slapped for taking money from the disabled. It's like taking the wheel off someone's wheel chair if the law says your entitled you certainly don't need some attorney holding your hand ensuring your rights the courts are supposed to do that right???
Anyway if your disabled (eligible) and only off work 6 months and you file you will automatically be denied based on the year rule because you were not off work one year. So lawyers no this what an easy case. They file an appeal knowing darn well your eligible wait the year and a half it takes to get through the appeal process that's if your lucky, and collect a portion of your check at some point while your going without in the process.
Lawyers and judges the courts in general are set up in such a way that it's all about money now no longer right and or wrong.
The judges that deny these poor unfortunate souls should be held accountable for ignoring the law when there is a "clear cut case".
Here's an example of how a york county judge ignored the law. Case of Trout v. Strube victim had Protection from abuse Order against Strube ( 4rth order in 10 years it should be 3 strikes and your out but that's a different topix) anyway the PFA act has a section that states the victim upon any violation of the order could request an extension of the term and judge Linebaugh in york county claimed that the word shall in the PFA act meant "at the Courts discretion" this dis-honorable judge ignored the law and robbed the victim of the justice the law says she is entitled to but what's it to him???
Judges suffer no consequence either way what motivation is it to rule rightly??? Imagine how much of a payoff they probably got from s.s. to make that decision initially.
Judges also recieve term salary too. They have no discipline and the very judicial center is also a RACIST SCAM please allow me to explain.
Judge Kelley of york county pa is white and had sex with a public defender while being a judge on the criminal bench, then she put a Protection from abuse against him so the presiding judge (Linebaugh) moved Kelley from the criminal bench to the civil to continue his unjust and inhumane screwing. So the judge who had a PFA against himself got to hear and rule on PFA cases unscathed.
Next we have the Honorable Judge Ballentine a black judge of Lancaster County Pa.
This poor judge was allegedly issued parking tickets way after the alleged violations (which is not legal, after 60 days they are no longer able to site you for a violation allegedly taking place more than 60 days prior) anyway, she was accused of dismissing parking tickets the news paper said nasty shit about her ect. she waS suspended 2 years. How fair is that???
Kelley pennitrated, and perverted justice plus couldn't keep his hands and pee pee to himself while on the bench and nothing done to him.
We need Judges to be held liable and responsible and have honest people of perhaps another kind of board than the current disciplinary one meauring out just punishment for such asshole judges.
They make money either way. Usually the one persuing justice vcan't afford to bribe the courts they are to busy litigating and paying other fees.
Of course People with a physical disability are denied before people with mental are, it simply exposes various USA SSA admin sections as nothing but direct pathological liars, frauds, and direct high fed court back downs. It would be more easy for SSA to illegally fraud and bribe off the mentally then to bribe off SSA recipients with only a physical injury.
SSA bigots Klan

San Diego, CA

#6 Dec 11, 2013
lady wrote:
In the instant case look at how much money the court generated for itself and the attorney;s while initially screwing this guy out of his rights until later. Why couldn't they have just given it to him in the beginning. Because they don't have to and unless your willing to fight for it you probably won't get it.
I don't understand how children who never worked a day in there life can get a check when they have parent's who are legally responsible for them and this poor guy has a family and no other means of support and didn't get it until he went through hell.
What's worse is some of these kids there parents collect it too. But they deny people like him.
THE COURTS AND IT"S JUDGES ARE CORRUPT PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A JURY DECIDING THESE CASES NOT SOME BIAST AND PAID "ADMINISTRATIVE" JUDGE who can easily be bribed. It's a little harder to do that with "jurors" of your peers but I guess only Criminals truly get to excersise there rights to a FAIR HEARING
you see, that's right , they are indeed fully open corrupt, and don't forget it, but after all, SSA admin also tries to fraud off and defraud cancer patients, no surprise.
John

Charleston, WV

#9 Dec 11, 2013
How about you lazy azzes go get a job and quite bitchin. I have yet to meet a person on SS disability that is truly disabled. Its just a scam for lazy people to collect a check. If you can type on a forum complaining about SS your capable of getting a job and working for a living. You people make me sick. Glad you got denied.
WE Pork Hicks

Anonymous Proxy

#10 Dec 11, 2013
John wrote:
How about you lazy azzes go get a job and quite bitchin. I have yet to meet a person on SS disability that is truly disabled. Its just a scam for lazy people to collect a check. If you can type on a forum complaining about SS your capable of getting a job and working for a living. You people make me sick. Glad you got denied.
Trouble is . those with X-rays punk, saw Honkey dwarf bumpkins like you in the morgues, good to see more strong ARM retaliations on system of racist frauds !!! those dying with cancer, those who are retarded, etc, see the stupid illiterates all the time, it was fun to kick the ass of a skunk who slammed public doors on USA vets with no legs, f-u chickenHawk
lady

Columbia, PA

#11 Dec 12, 2013
John wrote:
How about you lazy azzes go get a job and quite bitchin. I have yet to meet a person on SS disability that is truly disabled. Its just a scam for lazy people to collect a check. If you can type on a forum complaining about SS your capable of getting a job and working for a living. You people make me sick. Glad you got denied.
This is not a complaint department and before you go making assumptions you should really study the truth and if you don['t like the facts or the fact that you obviously have to work take that up with the Federal Gevernment they say it's ok to pass out checks.
Don't discriminate everyone is entitled. I think people who can't get it are jelous because they have to work for a livin otherwise they woudn't be bitchn. People dont' say no to free things unless your stuck up and too prideful
stool

Brooklyn, NY

#12 Dec 12, 2013
lady wrote:
<quoted text>This is not a complaint department and before you go making assumptions you should really study the truth and if you don['t like the facts or the fact that you obviously have to work take that up with the Federal Gevernment they say it's ok to pass out checks.
Don't discriminate everyone is entitled. I think people who can't get it are jelous because they have to work for a livin otherwise they woudn't be bitchn. People dont' say no to free things unless your stuck up and too prideful
Through all your hyperbolic meanderings and baseless accusations, one thing is profoundly clear. Your only idea of "rights" is what you can bleed the government for. Contrary to what you say about judges and lawyers, they are there to protect the country from the permanent welfare class constantly browsing for full teats.
It's not about being "stuck up and too prideful", it's about learning to wipe your own ass.
nthetramp

Columbia, PA

#14 Dec 12, 2013
stool wrote:
<quoted text>
Through all your hyperbolic meanderings and baseless accusations, one thing is profoundly clear. Your only idea of "rights" is what you can bleed the government for. Contrary to what you say about judges and lawyers, they are there to protect the country from the permanent welfare class constantly browsing for full teats.
It's not about being "stuck up and too prideful", it's about learning to wipe your own ass.
Some people can't wipe there own ass and there is nothing wrong with them collecting a check if they need it to survive on.
It's just a shame someone with an alleged "head" problem collects before someone who is unable to physically support themselves.
The only people who have a problem with it are people who never been in that position.
If you became ill with cancer and couldn't work would you want some hypocrite like yourself bitching about your check??
Or have to watch a family member go through that.
Some people work hard all there life, put there kids through college, than unfortunately fall ill and become unable to provide for thereself and family as a result. There is no other option but S.S. for those people. Now people with alleged "head" problems they are capable of working physically but who would hire them??
There are some people who probably shouldn't be getting it and some who definatly should be but that is determined by S.S. and the administrative judges in this case the "higher courts".
I'm just saying it's wrong for mom and each kid to collect seperate checks for each member when this poor fellow couldn't get one to support his self and family.
The system needs reformed and courts held accountable for denying and perverting justice. Also the lawyers they all profit off someone else's misfortune all to get what the law says they shoulod have anyway. Like i said before it's like taking the wheel off someones' wheel chair and only a greedy stuck up corrupt person would see it otherwise.
The attorney and courts both profitted off this case by denying his rights initially. If he would have got it right away the court's wouldn't have gotten a chuck of HIS money.
stool

Brooklyn, NY

#16 Dec 12, 2013
I don't disagree. but this particular poster, in her incoherent diatribe is nothing more then a mouthpiece for reparations, hook, line and sinker.
Regarding lawyers who do SS disability. They get paid by the government if successful. They usually take a cursory look and say they won't charge unless successful before signing on. Let's face it, anybody fighting for SS is probably lacking even a pot to piss in, excuse my French.
No one is ever the victim 100% of the time. Caveat emptor bitch.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#17 Dec 12, 2013
stool wrote:
I don't disagree. but this particular poster, in her incoherent diatribe is nothing more then a mouthpiece for reparations, hook, line and sinker.
Regarding lawyers who do SS disability. They get paid by the government if successful. They usually take a cursory look and say they won't charge unless successful before signing on. Let's face it, anybody fighting for SS is probably lacking even a pot to piss in, excuse my French.
No one is ever the victim 100% of the time. Caveat emptor bitch.
Gonna save that one for you.
stool

United States

#18 Dec 12, 2013
hennypennyhag wrote:
<quoted text>Gonna save that one for you.
I know. Even the lack of the usual suspects and posts are deleted.
Did you see my doggie and urinal pictures from Hawley?
Lost my two rescued brother dogs over the last year and a half. That little dog reminded me of them.
Injured worker

Princeton, WV

#19 Dec 12, 2013
I think it's very bad when you work 20+ years and you get injured, then you are put through the wringers, hoops or whatever, when that's my money that they didn't have any problem taking out of my pay, then you have a family who is on ssi that have never worked a day in their life and their kids quit school and immediately are on a check because of the way they where raised and they have little skills to none, but they don't have to wait and go through the wringers? This country is not for the honest or the working people! My opinion it's more communism here than you think? Social security is not broke because of disabled people it's the government giving working peoples money to everyone and everything but disabled workers???
stool

United States

#20 Dec 12, 2013
Injured worker wrote:
I think it's very bad when you work 20+ years and you get injured, then you are put through the wringers, hoops or whatever, when that's my money that they didn't have any problem taking out of my pay, then you have a family who is on ssi that have never worked a day in their life and their kids quit school and immediately are on a check because of the way they where raised and they have little skills to none, but they don't have to wait and go through the wringers? This country is not for the honest or the working people! My opinion it's more communism here than you think? Social security is not broke because of disabled people it's the government giving working peoples money to everyone and everything but disabled workers???
Are you a child? Any time the government gets involved with taking/giving money there's bound to be injustice. I would say that's the crux of all arguments on this forum
A lot of people go directly from unemployment to Social Security disability. I have no idea what the answer is. For once.
Injured worker

Princeton, WV

#23 Dec 12, 2013
stool wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a child? Any time the government gets involved with taking/giving money there's bound to be injustice. I would say that's the crux of all arguments on this forum
A lot of people go directly from unemployment to Social Security disability. I have no idea what the answer is. For once.
no I'm not a child, and unemployed as in injured to where as one can no longer work is what I'm referring to, not just unemployed? And your name is Stool I think we all get what your putting out?
lady

Columbia, PA

#24 Dec 12, 2013
stool wrote:
I don't disagree. but this particular poster, in her incoherent diatribe is nothing more then a mouthpiece for reparations, hook, line and sinker.
Regarding lawyers who do SS disability. They get paid by the government if successful. They usually take a cursory look and say they won't charge unless successful before signing on. Let's face it, anybody fighting for SS is probably lacking even a pot to piss in, excuse my French.
No one is ever the victim 100% of the time. Caveat emptor bitch.
Lady and nthetramp are the same poster remember the comment "it's like taking the wheel off someone's wheel chair?"
So you agree with one but disagree with the other? I'd ask you to explain but I don't want to hear anymore of your whining
I vote yes stool you are a child or to illiterate to know the only difference is the name the posts and there points remain the same.
stool

Milford, PA

#25 Dec 13, 2013
lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Lady and nthetramp are the same poster remember the comment "it's like taking the wheel off someone's wheel chair?"
So you agree with one but disagree with the other? I'd ask you to explain but I don't want to hear anymore of your whining
I vote yes stool you are a child or to illiterate to know the only difference is the name the posts and there points remain the same.
Hold on thar. Does, "Don't discriminate everyone is entitled. I think people who can't get it are jelous because they have to work for a livin otherwise they woudn't be bitchn. People dont' say no to free things unless your stuck up and too prideful"

sound like,

"There are some people who probably shouldn't be getting it and some who definatly should be but that is determined by S.S. and the administrative judges in this case the "higher courts"." ???
I think not. In the latter you sound like a bitter but honest worker who probably pulled back a nub or two from a Tyson meat saw, no doubt exacerbated by a predilection for methamphetamines. In the former, a welfare mammie from years gone by. No doubt intended to get our attention.
Im hopng yins got a tramp stamp of the Delaware toll plaza above the whale tail.
lady

Columbia, PA

#27 Dec 13, 2013
Your a failure at guessing games too you should stop while your ahead.

I'm tired of people like you worrying about someone collecting a check.
Your no better of a person just because you may have to work for yours
That's what's wrong with this country too many prideful people that think they have the right to talk badly about those collecting.
Some deserve it some don't but the topix was about this poor guy getting wrongfully denied.
The rest is a matter of opinion too, to bad if you don't like.
Have fun working which you can't be doing to much of here.
stool

Milford, PA

#28 Dec 13, 2013
lady wrote:
Your a failure at guessing games too you should stop while your ahead.

I'm tired of people like you worrying about someone collecting a check.
Your no better of a person just because you may have to work for yours
That's what's wrong with this country too many prideful people that think they have the right to talk badly about those collecting.
Some deserve it some don't but the topix was about this poor guy getting wrongfully denied.
The rest is a matter of opinion too, to bad if you don't like.
Have fun working which you can't be doing to much of here.
If you had the ability to write a coherent response instead of going off tangentially then maybe you might garner some sympathy for this man. Judging by the length of your responses I'd say you have all time in the world. I recommend mastuerbation to fill your empty days.
SAnta Clause

Stroudsburg, PA

#29 Dec 13, 2013
stool wrote:
<quoted text>
If you had the ability to write a coherent response instead of going off tangentially then maybe you might garner some sympathy for this man. Judging by the length of your responses I'd say you have all time in the world. I recommend mastuerbation to fill your empty days.
Dont you ever get tired of talking to yourself fool?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Social Security Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Australian PM urged to go easy on refugees afte... 5 min Booga Extraction ... 12
Privy Council tried to slow social security hires Wed other lessons 1
Utica man admits getting $400,00 in fraudulent ... Dec 16 Stuttering Utican 2
Jeff Sessions: - We Are Going To Fight Harder T... Dec 15 spytheweb 5
Social Security continuing to pursue claims aga... Dec 15 Le Jimbo 7
Universal income is still just common sense Dec 15 pat 1
Immigrants flock to workshops after Obama reprieve Dec 13 Guess Who 7
More from around the web