In Fiscal Cliff Talks, Higher Taxes V...

In Fiscal Cliff Talks, Higher Taxes Vs. Closing Loopholes

There are 7 comments on the GPB.org story from Nov 19, 2012, titled In Fiscal Cliff Talks, Higher Taxes Vs. Closing Loopholes. In it, GPB.org reports that:

President Obama, accompanied by House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, speaks to reporters at the White House on Friday during a meeting to discuss the fiscal cliff.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at GPB.org.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1 Nov 19, 2012
Throw the bums out.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#2 Nov 19, 2012
The only one's paying higher taxes will be those of us who don't have "access" to the loopholes. We need tax reform. The liberal dems are so stupid, they have their dependency based riled up to scream for higher taxes on the top 1% of earners. Yet, they don't realize that without tax reform and loophole elimination, those increases won't mean a hill of beans. A 35% tax rate raised to 55% means nothing when they already pay NOTHING because of loopholes.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#3 Nov 19, 2012
CBOW wrote:
The only one's paying higher taxes will be those of us who don't have "access" to the loopholes. We need tax reform. The liberal dems are so stupid, they have their dependency based riled up to scream for higher taxes on the top 1% of earners. Yet, they don't realize that without tax reform and loophole elimination, those increases won't mean a hill of beans. A 35% tax rate raised to 55% means nothing when they already pay NOTHING because of loopholes.
The only chance we had of being the America we once were was voting against marxism. We didn't, so now the clue is to survive until sanity returns. If it ever does.
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#4 Nov 19, 2012
taking 100% of all 1%ers assets right now will pay for 6 weeks of obamas spending at current levels, then after taking these 1%ers ddown to poverty levels, who's obama going to go after next you think ? the trillions in 401k, other retirement accounts, annuities etc. wait for it. redistribution of all of it is his goal as long as the politburo elite skim off what they want.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#5 Nov 19, 2012
lolol wrote:
taking 100% of all 1%ers assets right now will pay for 6 weeks of obamas spending at current levels, then after taking these 1%ers ddown to poverty levels, who's obama going to go after next you think ? the trillions in 401k, other retirement accounts, annuities etc. wait for it. redistribution of all of it is his goal as long as the politburo elite skim off what they want.
Yes, Obama's goal is to definitely start taxing wealth, not just income. This will virtually kill the family farm and ranches. It will also attack manufacturing, which will move more jobs off shore, but that is what Obama wants. He wants poor and unarmed citizens, just like Cuba and North Korea. It is the only way for their power to continue.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#6 Dec 11, 2012
So, where are the spending cuts necessary to reign in the deficit? Why doesn't the liberal dem party address this, since IT WILL HAPPEN sooner or later? All the liberal media does is spout off about taxing the rich, meanwhile, Odumbo hasn't even offered to cut the spending.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#7 Dec 11, 2012
CBOW wrote:
So, where are the spending cuts necessary to reign in the deficit? Why doesn't the liberal dem party address this, since IT WILL HAPPEN sooner or later? All the liberal media does is spout off about taxing the rich, meanwhile, Odumbo hasn't even offered to cut the spending.
75 Percent of President's Proposed Tax Hikes to Go Toward New Spending...In other words, the extra taxes are just to buy votes.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday Democrats aren't going to make an offer on spending cuts for Republicans and that it will be hard to reach a "fiscal cliff" deal before Christmas. SAME PLOY THEY USED LAST YEAR, put nothing on the table themselves, but blames republicans for not dropping their pants. Only the children would fall for the Obama two step.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mortgage Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Kerry heads back to US with surgeon for broken ... 3 min Sterkfontein Swar... 11
News Arizona enacts nation's tightest welfare restri... May 29 American Citizen 1 1
News Wells Fargo starts foreclosure proceedings on s... (Jul '09) May 28 bill 27
News Q&A with John C. Williams, president and CEO of... (Oct '14) May 25 al3abbanat 4
News Quit protecting financial crooks (Oct '09) May 24 Swedenforever 12
News Paulson insists bailout restoring stability (Nov '08) May 23 swedenforever 14
News Significance of 'Victory Homes' not lost on Her... (Jun '09) May 20 no Jail 4 rate r... 2
More from around the web