County recorder defeats appointee in ...

County recorder defeats appointee in Franklin County Probate Court | The Columbus Dispatch

There are 4 comments on the Columbus Dispatch story from Nov 3, 2010, titled County recorder defeats appointee in Franklin County Probate Court | The Columbus Dispatch. In it, Columbus Dispatch reports that:

Franklin County Probate Court Judge Alan Acker, who has drawn controversy since he was appointed to the bench in June, lost to Republican Robert G. Montgomery yesterday, gaining about 41 percent of the vote, according to final, unofficial totals.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Columbus Dispatch.


Columbus, OH

#1 Nov 3, 2010
I don't feel sorry for that loser Acker. His statment of "feeling sorry for the people of the county" is a classless statement. Glad Mr. Acker lost.

Since: Dec 09


#2 Nov 3, 2010
Acker lost, now his sons will be out of work and how on Earth will minors get married without their parents permission?

Galion, OH

#3 Nov 4, 2010
These are ignorant comments. You may have never agreed with how this one sided paper portrayed Acker, but you don't realize that the people of franklin county just proved to both parties all you need is a name. screw qualifications. I don't think you understand that the people are going to have a hell of a time if they need the probate court for the next few years. You can't learn probate in a year.
Now no qualified lawyer is ever going to want to run for judge... that is pathetic. Maybe before you make comments you should research about both of their qualifications and what EVERY single lawyer has said about Judge Acker. They were all backers for judge Acker.

Since: Dec 09


#4 Nov 4, 2010
Jen - I did do my research on every candidate prior to voting, and not from only Dispatch reporting.

I voted against Acker because I didn't like his decisions in several cases, including the ones I listed above.

I did not find much on negative comments from lawyers, but that is not the deciding factor. If I was a probate lawyer, I wouldn't say anything negative about a judge that I may have to appear before either.

At the same time time I would not promote voting for him either because of having to appear before his replacement, judges are human and will let support influence their decisions.

Goodbye Mr. Acker

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Estate Planning Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Estate Planning Strategies You Should Know About Jul '17 Davidpmcdowell 1
News Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: Not a pity party Jun '17 Kathyloveswright11 1
Does anybody in your family have a rare coin co... Apr '17 findthemhere 1
Where is the Best Place to Store Your Will and ... (Feb '17) Feb '17 jata 1
News LegalShielda s Membership Grows to an All Time ... (Jan '17) Jan '17 rcarpenter7 2
divisional property (Nov '16) Nov '16 fri 1
Outsmart the IRS : Invest Offshore and Secure Y... (Sep '16) Sep '16 BushDidIT 1
More from around the web