Join the discussion below, or Read more at DispatchPolitics.
#65 Nov 21, 2010
We are a group of students from the University of Southern California's law school who are trying to evaluate the market feasibility of our idea that revolves around proper management of ones real estate assets.
It will be great if you all could help us in getting a fair idea about the needs of the market by filling out the following survey:
Please be rest assured that your responses won't be misused in any way. If you want to know more about our business idea, then please feel free to contact me at email@example.com
#66 Feb 13, 2011
> Legal Lady #26 Nov 3, 2010 Columbus, OH
The article was silent about then Judge Acker usurping the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court because the article's author was unaware of what was not known.
The mom was unhappy because the ex parte conduct of then Judge Acker was brazenly and inexcusably lacking in basic judicial and attorney ethics.
I respectfully submit that the only folks surprised that the mother was unhappy are those woefully ignorant of the proper procedure when parents do not consent to the marriage of their minor child.
The case was a slam dunk for any one who understands what the words "exclusive jurisdiction" mean.
Agree that "fair" is not the standard. The Rule of Law is the standard and then Judge Acker was clearly ultra vires when he usurped jurisdiction and "granted permission" in an ex parte "application" (as he called it).
I suggest and hope that now Judge Montgomery would send the children to a juvenile judge to obtain consent then return with the consent.
Several "hated" the decision made by a Muskingum County probate judge (with NO jurisdiction) after he ordered a female sterilized.
Not only was his decision "unfair" it was actionable and there was no way that he could claim judicial immunity when he was hammered in a civil action. The Federal court was clear on the issue.
#67 Dec 26, 2012
" and always thinks it is unfair. Fair isn't the standard. "
Opinions are made more valid when decisions stray from standards established by the law. Make no mistake, Acker is a pos.
#68 Dec 26, 2012
Sure do wish I could talk to you. While a matter hasn't been revealed, the effects of Acker's decisions still reverberate today.
Add your comments below
|POD Beneficiary vs 'Regular' Beneficiary||Dec '17||Confused Estate P...||1|
|Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: Not a pity party (Jun '17)||Dec '17||Neil||2|
|Briefs for veterans||Nov '17||Venator||1|
|Libbey Latin teacher donates to UM (Jan '13)||Nov '17||jestockman||2|
|Draft tax changes put families, partners of dec...||Sep '17||Mac||1|
|Estate Planning Strategies You Should Know About (Jul '17)||Jul '17||Davidpmcdowell||1|
|Does anybody in your family have a rare coin co... (Apr '17)||Apr '17||findthemhere||1|
Find what you want!
Search Estate Planning Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC