Anti-abortion march to draw thousands to Washington

Jan 24, 2013 Full story: USA Today 99

Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to fill the National Mall on Friday to protest the 40-year-old landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the first trimester.

Full Story
First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Ocean56

AOL

#83 Feb 7, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
Now Ocean, you must understand that his male god has a great deal of time on his hands and spends it filling women's uteruses and patrolling them. Some days he is in a foul mood and decides to boot the fetus out , or he causes fetal deformity and other health and life related risks. Bedroom patrol is his main job, this is why he does not have time to pay attention to wars, hunger and all the rest of the minor details. Women are his transportation toy and haven't a right to make decisions even if they are virgins he can still knockem up! He has focused on women's reproductive lives ever since that bitch Eve ate his apple.
I don't know why you are not accepting this, perfectly logical!
lol I know; silly me for not accepting this, right? I can almost feel sorry for this "God," he obviously has nothing better to do.:-)

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#84 Feb 7, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
lol I know; silly me for not accepting this, right? I can almost feel sorry for this "God," he obviously has nothing better to do.:-)
Yeah, this god of his is like a little boy who likes to pull the girls hair. A brat.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#85 Feb 7, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
You bet I put them in the same mold just as you put liberals. You think you have the right to judge but not be judged.
Christianity is a myth just as your buddies with islam. You are all nuts and control freaks.
Again: The Constitution Party huh? Christian Reconstructionists? Howard Phillips? Rousas John Rushdoony? The only thing that bothers you about the muslims is they govern by theocracy something you cannot and will not accomplish. You are a misogynistic phallic worshipping brainwashed misfit and I will remain intolerant of your type just as a black person would be intolerant of the KKK. Comprende?
Sorry but you can't put me in the same category as the klan. I comprehend that you are using a straw man argument! You are the one who is brainwashed. GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOUR BLASPHEMOUS SOUL! Repent!

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#86 Feb 7, 2013
kaylayossi wrote:
<quoted text>
Beautifully put by Mr. Paul. Thank you for posting this :)
Thanks Kaylayossi for your excellent comments! I praying for both Ms Ocean and Ms Morgana. God loves both of them inspite of their blasphemy and hateful rhetoric. God have mercy on their souls!

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#87 Feb 7, 2013
OneProphet wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry but you can't put me in the same category as the klan. I comprehend that you are using a straw man argument! You are the one who is brainwashed. GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOUR BLASPHEMOUS SOUL! Repent!
I DID, I CAN, and WILL continue to put you in the same category and there is nothing you can do about it! That should trigger your control issues. I am not the one professing devotion to a male god in a misogynistic bigoted book written by men. I am also not the one insisting others live by that mythological book and I am not the one who wishes to instill a theocracy on a free country. That would be brainwashed, that would be you.

Again: The Constitution Party huh? Christian Reconstructionists? Howard Phillips? Rousas John Rushdoony?

I know a little something about the above mentioned I have been watching these nuts for years;

""Generally, Reconstructionism seeks to replace democracy with a theocratic elite that would govern by imposing their interpretation of "Biblical Law." Reconstructionism would eliminate not only democracy but many of its manifestations, such as labor unions, civil rights laws, and public schools. Women would be generally relegated to hearth and home. Insufficiently Christian men would be denied citizenship, perhaps executed. So severe is this theocracy that it would extend capital punishment beyond such crimes as kidnapping, rape, and murder to include, among other things, blasphemy, heresy, adultery, and homosexuality.

Epitomizing the Reconstructionist idea of Biblical "warfare" is the centrality of capital punishment under Biblical Law. Doctrinal leaders (notably Rushdoony, North, and Bahnsen) call for the death penalty for a wide range of crimes in addition to such contemporary capital crimes as rape, kidnapping, and murder. Death is also the punishment for apostasy (abandonment of the faith), heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, incorrigible juvenile delinquency, and, in the case of women, "unchastity before marriage."
According to Gary North, women who have abortions should be publicly executed, "along with those who advised them to abort their children." Rushdoony concludes: "God's government prevails, and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them." Reconstructionists insist that "the death penalty is the maximum, not necessarily the mandatory penalty." However, such judgments may depend less on Biblical Principles than on which faction gains power in the theocratic republic. The potential for bloodthirsty episodes on the order of the Salem witchcraft trials or the Spanish Inquisition is inadvertently revealed by Reconstructionist theologian Rev. Ray Sutton, who claims that the Reconstructed Biblical theocracies would be "happy" places, to which people would flock because "capital punishment is one of the best evangelistic tools of a society."""

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chris...

http://www.conservapedia.com/Christian_Recons...

The lost argument of a religious nut case is the cry of BLASPHEMOUS!!
Rogue Pig

Ashburn, VA

#88 Feb 7, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, this god of his is like a little boy who likes to pull the girls hair. A brat.
Some girls like their hair pulled, just saying.

I know, I know, I'm a Pig.

Oink Oink
Ocean56

AOL

#89 Feb 8, 2013
OneProphet wrote:
Thanks Kaylayossi for your excellent comments! I praying for both Ms Ocean and Ms Morgana. God loves both of them inspite of their blasphemy and hateful rhetoric. God have mercy on their souls!
You can pray all you want, goofy, it isn't going to make any difference to me. It won't make me a convert to whatever misogynistic religion or church you belong to either.

EACH woman still has the right to decide for HERSELF whether or not to continue a pregnancy, which means YOU don't get to make that choice for her. If she wants to continue it, fine. If she DOESN'T want to continue it, also fine.

Motherhood is still OPTIONAL, not required. That means a woman can reject it if she doesn't want the hardships and responsibilities it involves. Whether YOU approve of her decision to reject it or not is irrelevant.
Ocean56

AOL

#90 Feb 8, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
I DID, I CAN, and WILL continue to put you in the same category and there is nothing you can do about it! That should trigger your control issues. I am not the one professing devotion to a male god in a misogynistic bigoted book written by men. I am also not the one insisting others live by that mythological book and I am not the one who wishes to instill a theocracy on a free country. That would be brainwashed, that would be you.

The lost argument of a religious nut case is the cry of BLASPHEMOUS!!
So very true, Morgana. You know the militant religionists here have lost the argument when they scream "BLASPHEMY" or something equally ridiculous.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#91 Feb 8, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
So very true, Morgana. You know the militant religionists here have lost the argument when they scream "BLASPHEMY" or something equally ridiculous.
This nuts blog proudly announces his membership in the Constitution Party which rightfully should be named the Biblically Fanatically Insane Party. The Christian Reconstructionists hide under such names in order to look patriotic when they are anything but. The other name they hide under is the Tea Party, again to look as though they are focused on taxes.

They are in our political system and they have an agenda, and when people wake up and have the information they will be tossed to the curb and crawl back under their rock. As an example Sen. Shadrack McGill (AL) is about as blatant as they get. People need to recognize these clowns and call them what they are "Christian Reconstructionists"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/shad...

You may be aware of these fanatics, if not check them out and spread the word!
Ocean56

AOL

#92 Feb 8, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
They are in our political system and they have an agenda, and when people wake up and have the information they will be tossed to the curb and crawl back under their rock. As an example Sen. Shadrack McGill (AL) is about as blatant as they get. People need to recognize these clowns and call them what they are "Christian Reconstructionists"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/shad...
You may be aware of these fanatics, if not check them out and spread the word!
Thanks, Morgana, I read the article. As far as I'M concerned, this guy McGill is another religious extremist who wants to use his office to impose his idiotic ideas on the people he serves.

Did you read the comments following the article? I love reading those, and I was happy to see that quite a few readlers SLAMMED this guy hard.:-)

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#93 Feb 9, 2013
I am not a member of the Constitution Party. I was a dues paying member of the Missouri Constitution Party for one year-2009. I have considered myself a Republican since I was a kid and have voted mostly Republican since 1976 when I turned 18. In 1989, I became a supporting member of the Prohibition Party. I am still considered as a member of the Prohibition National Committee.

Interestingly, the Women's Suffrage Movement was led by Prohibitionist Frances Willard, president of the Women's Christian Temperance Union.

Morgana I am not a racist and I DONOT want to control women! Ask my wife who controls the money in my household and does a fine job of it!

We are on our way to Monmouth Illinois for the funeral of my wife's sister which is tomorrow.

Morgana and Ocean56: You are worshippers of Ashtoreth and believe in sacrificing the unborn to your goddess, much like the Baal worshippers of the Canaanites. Except they sacrificed after birth babies.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#94 Feb 9, 2013
OneProphet wrote:
I am not a member of the Constitution Party. I was a dues paying member of the Missouri Constitution Party for one year-2009. I have considered myself a Republican since I was a kid and have voted mostly Republican since 1976 when I turned 18. In 1989, I became a supporting member of the Prohibition Party. I am still considered as a member of the Prohibition National Committee.
Interestingly, the Women's Suffrage Movement was led by Prohibitionist Frances Willard, president of the Women's Christian Temperance Union.
Morgana I am not a racist and I DONOT want to control women! Ask my wife who controls the money in my household and does a fine job of it!
We are on our way to Monmouth Illinois for the funeral of my wife's sister which is tomorrow.
Morgana and Ocean56: You are worshippers of Ashtoreth and believe in sacrificing the unborn to your goddess, much like the Baal worshippers of the Canaanites. Except they sacrificed after birth babies.
I am sorry about the death in your family.

Have a safe trip.

For the record I worship nothing but my freedom. It is you that expects the worship of something. You cannot seem to think beyond that. Again, brainwashing.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#95 Feb 11, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry about the death in your family.
Have a safe trip.
For the record I worship nothing but my freedom. It is you that expects the worship of something. You cannot seem to think beyond that. Again, brainwashing.
Thankyou Morgana! So far we have had a safe trip. Gotta be back to work Thursday. My good wife has to be back to work Wednesday. Back on the road tomorrow!

Regards,
Swift in Dexter Missouri
Ocean56

AOL

#96 Feb 12, 2013
OneProphet wrote:
Morgana and Ocean56: You are worshippers of Ashtoreth and believe in sacrificing the unborn to your goddess, much like the Baal worshippers of the Canaanites. Except they sacrificed after birth babies.
You can make whatever lame insults and false claims you want. It doesn't change the fact that EACH woman has the right to decide for HERSELF whether or not to continue a pregnancy. If it isn't YOUR pregnancy, it isn't your decision. It really IS that simple.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#97 Feb 15, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry about the death in your family.
Have a safe trip.
For the record I worship nothing but my freedom. It is you that expects the worship of something. You cannot seem to think beyond that. Again, brainwashing.
Thanks for setting the record straight on your worship. I stand corrected on that point and apologize.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#98 Feb 16, 2013
OneProphet wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for setting the record straight on your worship. I stand corrected on that point and apologize.
Not a problem!
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#99 Feb 18, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
I DID, I CAN, and WILL continue to put you in the same category and there is nothing you can do about it! That should trigger your control issues. I am not the one professing devotion to a male god in a misogynistic bigoted book written by men. I am also not the one insisting others live by that mythological book and I am not the one who wishes to instill a theocracy on a free country. That would be brainwashed, that would be you.
Again: The Constitution Party huh? Christian Reconstructionists? Howard Phillips? Rousas John Rushdoony?
I know a little something about the above mentioned I have been watching these nuts for years;
""Generally, Reconstructionism seeks to replace democracy with a theocratic elite that would govern by imposing their interpretation of "Biblical Law." Reconstructionism would eliminate not only democracy but many of its manifestations, such as labor unions, civil rights laws, and public schools. Women would be generally relegated to hearth and home. Insufficiently Christian men would be denied citizenship, perhaps executed. So severe is this theocracy that it would extend capital punishment beyond such crimes as kidnapping, rape, and murder to include, among other things, blasphemy, heresy, adultery, and homosexuality.
Epitomizing the Reconstructionist idea of Biblical "warfare" is the centrality of capital punishment under Biblical Law. Doctrinal leaders (notably Rushdoony, North, and Bahnsen) call for the death penalty for a wide range of crimes in addition to such contemporary capital crimes as rape, kidnapping, and murder. Death is also the punishment for apostasy (abandonment of the faith), heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, incorrigible juvenile delinquency, and, in the case of women, "unchastity before marriage."
According to Gary North, women who have abortions should be publicly executed, "along with those who advised them to abort their children." Rushdoony concludes: "God's government prevails, and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them." Reconstructionists insist that "the death penalty is the maximum, not necessarily the mandatory penalty." However, such judgments may depend less on Biblical Principles than on which faction gains power in the theocratic republic. The potential for bloodthirsty episodes on the order of the Salem witchcraft trials or the Spanish Inquisition is inadvertently revealed by Reconstructionist theologian Rev. Ray Sutton, who claims that the Reconstructed Biblical theocracies would be "happy" places, to which people would flock because "capital punishment is one of the best evangelistic tools of a society."""
http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chris...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Christian_Recons...
The lost argument of a religious nut case is the cry of BLASPHEMOUS!!
http://mediamatters.org/research/2011/02/18/w...

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#100 Feb 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
WOW!! Thanks Katie, the shit just keeps rolling doesn't it??
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#101 Feb 18, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW!! Thanks Katie, the shit just keeps rolling doesn't it??
It does and it is unnerving. So far I've little opportunity for the links to actually show up. Am so glad you saw it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US National Parks Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec 23 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Bono, Beyonce & The Boss headline Obama bash (Jan '09) Dec 17 juegoskizi 6
US stocks start lower Dec 16 Anthony V 104
National Park Service, In Court Filing, Claims ... Dec 14 Mel 1
Martin Litton, pioneering wildland guardian, dies Dec 4 Kid_Tomorrow 1
Harry Reid Internet Sales Tax Illustration by G... Dec 1 Cat74 1
Letter: Save the Trees Nov 26 Joe Krupinski 1
More from around the web